Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 101 to 125 of 1222 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Michelle Nebel

    I object to the Mallard Pass Project because it utilises good arable land, the disruption to traffic in the local area, the negative impact it will have on wildlife, the reduction in our rural scenery... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Miriam Spring Davies

    I wholeheartedly do not want this to go ahead, I think it’s a complete travesty, solar panels should be out on industrial roofs NOT on arable land. Where will it stop???

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Moira Moore

    I object to the size of the proposed solar farm; we will be giving up good quality arable land on which currently cereal crops are grown. Food security is also a huge issue at the moment ; the solar... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Monica Nobbs (Monica Nobbs) on behalf of Monica Nobbs (Monica Nobbs)

    I'm writing on behave of a family member She does not want the mallard pass passed as - no farmland for food -impact on wildlife - course light pollution -will look unsightly -ruin scenery

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • MPSP-GDPR002

    I have a horse in the local area and the bridle paths claim to be redirected however these seem to be as a footpath or I’m expected to ride next to the solar panels, which my horse will not be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Stephen Nicholas Cross on behalf of Mr & Mrs Cross (Mr & Mrs Cross)

    Obvious impact of infrastructure of this size and type fall into two main considerations: Construction Impact As we understand the assessment to date, the construction will be undertaken over a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Mr Stephen Leonard Dentith

    UK food security. Economic and moral cost. Varied output. Loss of amenity. Other ways of producing low carbon energy. Who profits.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Mrs A M Shaw

    I do not think the solar farms are as efficient as we are led to believe.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Mrs F Allett

    Solar panels can be put on property they do not need to use up valuable agricultural land. Once agricultural land has had its use changed it may be used for other projects like housing which there is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Mrs Jayne Gibson

    • Sheer size of the proposed development (over 2,000 acres) is out of proportion with the local environment and would change the essentially rural character of the area. • Potential damage to local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Mrs Natalie Kate Pretsell

    Whilst I am in favour of saucing different energy provision that is sustainable, I am against this being in our countryside so close to residence and having a destructive impact on our wildlife.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Mrs Phyllis Dentith

    Objections to Mallard Solar Farm This farmland should not be used for such purpose removing it from its present agricultual use for the following reasons: 1. Food security More than ever since the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Natalie Forkin

    I am resident close to the area of the proposed Mallard Pass. My main concern - and objection to the scheme - is the impact on farm land and the local environment. We are currently suffering from a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • National Highways (National Highways )

    National Highways has been appointed by the Secretary of State for Transport as a strategic highway company and is the highway authority, traffic authority and street authority for the Strategic Road... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    Below is a summary of our relevant representations. We have sent an email with our full representations to mallardpasssolar@planningsinpectorate.gov.uk. The areas of concern we consider require... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP (Addleshaw Goddard LLP) on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)

    APPLICATION BY MALLARD PASS SOLAR FARM LIMITED FOR AN ORDER GRANTING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT FOR THE MALLARD PASS SOLAR FARM Planning Inspectorate Reference Number: EN010127 Section 56 Planning Act 2008:... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Nichola Griffin

    I am very concerned about the increase in traffic during the building of the solar farm,this is already a busy road (school runs ,journeys to and from work) and there are frequent accidents and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Nicholas Grice

    As an ex domestic solar installer who is broadly supportive of renewables to reduce CO2 emissions and offset the UK’s baseload reliance on expensive gas - I strongly oppose the Mallard Pass proposal.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Nicholas Hugh Kimberley

    I am mainly against the use of good arable land for solar farms which could be producing UK food when there are more suitable alternatives such as former tips, contaminated land, poor agricultural... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Nicholas Paul fahidy

    I fully support this project and would like to see the NIMBYs who are opposing it have their electricity cut off and have generator treadmills installed in their homes so they can use their excess... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Nick Gilchrist

    I wish to see updated plans and whether agriculture of some sort can continue under the panels.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Nigel Trevarthen

    I believe this development will have a significant negative effect on the local environment and the visual amenity of the immediate area. The loss of agricultural land has an impact on the nation's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Norman Herbert

    I strongly believe that an infrastructure project of this magnitude is completely inappropriate for our small rural community, the impact on wild life, detriment to the quality of life for both... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Patricia A Mitchell

    Thursday, 2 March 2023 timed at 20.05 P A Mitchell I submit this as my formal representation to the Planning Inspectorate to become an interested party and my objections (and concerns) in respect of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Patricia Margaret Wilby

    The project is too large for our rural county and the disruption to local life will be too much

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023