Filter
A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 526 to 550 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Mr Derek Langley

    This scheme would cause huge damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. Less damaging options should have included in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mr G L Rogers

    I believe the site is unique and of huge historic importance. I think what's being planned is an act of vandalism and not something we can undo with the benefit of hindsight! I think that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mr Hugh L Williams

    my concerns over this project are principally on the length of the tunnel proposed and to the possible damage the proposed road will cause to the historic landscape that not only includes Stonehenge... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mr Phillip M Donegan

    I believe that the proposed road works will cause irreparable damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. It's unique setting will be ruined, and important archaeology will be lost forever. In... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mr Warwick Conway

    I am concerned that the proposed scheme will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and its environment. I also believe that insufficient consideration has been given to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mr. Arthur Phillipson

    I strongly OBJECT to this proposal for the following reasons: This would DESTROY a Blick Mead World Herritage Site BEYOND REPAIR! UNESCOs' International Advisers have made it clear that the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mrs Janet Collier

    Given the huge amount of disquiet and the world significance of this site and the pride and love felt for it: I urge you to reconsider the present proposals. Take a step back and ask for all to begin... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mrs Jenny Langley

    Described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’, this scheme would cause huge damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. Less damaging options should have included in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mrs Sara Bryant

    The proposal will not provide an effective answer to traffic problems. The proposal would destroy for ever significant sections of one of the largest and most important ancient sites in the world,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mrs Shirley Brailey

    I am sorry but I do not agree with the tunnel, we desperately need the road to be finished as soon as possible. The tunnel is too costly and will disturb too much of the ground. There is plenty of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Mrs. Jennifer Combe

    Why spend so much money digging tunnel when you could easily take the 303 further south and take in Salisbury as well. This is NOT a World Heritage site.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Ms Lawrence

    Dear Sir/ Madame, I am concerned that Stonehenge is going to be ruined and the quality of life around it, Ms Lawrence

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Ms Angie Rankin

    I oppose the scheme which I believe will damage the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and wildlife in the area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Ms Emma E Landers

    I object to the development on the grounds that it will cause Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ I'm also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Ms Hannah Sassoon

    Irreparable damage to Stonehenge & it's surrounding area, risking the unique archaeology treasures instead of preserving them for the generations to come UNESCO’s international advisers do not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Muriel Passmore

    I am responding to this because I am concerned about the damaged that will be done to the area, its archaeology and the surrounding land. UNESCO have described this site and a 'landscape without... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Neal Mason

    Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Neil Cosburn

    I strongly support the proposal, it will have a major impact on the villages surrounding Stonehenge such as Middle Woodford by reducing "rat-running" by drivers attempting to avoid the gridlock on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Neil Taylor

    I am concerned about distruption to the archaeology of a World Heritage site, and that the scientific advisers at Unesco state that the scheme should not go ahead in its current form. The neolithic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Nicholas C Lutwyche

    I am old enough to remember taking my young son to Stonehenge when access to the enormous stones was permitted. (I'm a British citizen and lived for many years in Central Dorset and South... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Nicola Gray

    I could argue and write an essay on these proposals. In its most simplistic form the key argument is plain. Once proposals are put in place this unique site its changed forever. We will never get it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Nicola Ogborn

    I Believe that the current plan to imporove the traffic congestion at Stonehenge has not been thouroughly thought through and has the potential to cause irreparable damage to wildlife and potentially... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Nigel Foster

    This is a World Heritage Site and must be protected

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Nigel Spring

    I am very concerned that the proposed scheme will threaten not just the World Heritage site but also much of the adjacent land which has extremely high biodiversity value.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018

  • Norman Burr

    I believe that the plans as they currently stand are not sufficiently ambitious, in that the tunnel is too short. This in turn will lead to approach roads etc being too close to the monument, thus... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 December 2018