Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I'm very concerned about the lack of public walking routes there will be once tunnel is dug. On the current plans it looks like I won't be able to walk,run from larkhill,or along kings barrows area....
Read more
-
The possibility that there might be any damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ is one of the most distructive plans to...
Read more
-
Butterfly Conservation wishes to be an Interested Party at the forthcoming examination for the following reasons:
1. We wish to ensure that effects on chalk grassland and hedgerow habitats that...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an iconic piece of British heritage. I am appalled at the negative effect the proposal will have on this ancient landscape and the lands surrounding it which are of massive and unique...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme risks irreversible damage to the wider ceremonial landscape in which the henge is set. Already damage has been done to Blick Mead, with Auroch traces being disturbed. The site is...
Read more
-
Very bad plan because damage to surroundings and wildlife plus too much traffic noises.
-
The Government proposes to widen the A303 trunk road to the south west. This road crosses the iconic Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS), which has been called “the most archaeologically significant...
Read more
-
The new proposed road across the River Till valley in Winterbourne Stoke is to high and will be extremely noisy for the village and will be environmentally damaging, on the previous plan that was...
Read more
-
I am a resident of Shrewton and a very keen horse rider and carriage driver and am therefore very interested in the impacts on the local rights of way. I hope that the project will improve the access...
Read more
-
I register my interest in the proposed tunnel at Stonehenge.
Damage has already been done to the World Heritage site at Blick Mead, it would be tragic and irresponsible to compound it with this...
Read more
-
It must be questioned whether this scheme represents a good use of Government money for transport, noting that the initial BCR (0.23 or 0.21 depending on funding options) would make the scheme...
Read more
-
As a World important site I feel that Stonehenge must be protected for future generations, and that we must show that we are serious about conservation, being an example to other countries.Thus the...
Read more
-
The route of the A303 passes through, and near, terrain containing priceless historical and prehistoric remains that will be irrevocably changed, or totally destroyed by the proposed work. Even if the...
Read more
-
I believe the majority of previous representations have been a combination of those against and "don't knows". The tunnel is clearly being railroaded through as part of the project in spite of this...
Read more
-
I do not agree with the tunnel ,as it destroying archaeological sites. If you don't want people slowing down to look at Stonehenge,plant some trees.. and out up signs for people to park on the byway...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme would cause significant and irreparable damage to an already threatened and compromised landscape and World Heritage monument and to the wildlife of the area
-
I feel the excavation will make irreparable damage to a site of national and international importance.
The area has not been fully explored and we have made new discoveries about the area in the last...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site landscape.
Emphasis on heritage, it is a sacred landscape.
-
In my view the proposed tunnel is too short and cuts into the World Heritage site, I agree with the concerns raised by UNESCO
-
I regard the proposal as destructive to the World Heritage Site. I object to the loss of the view of Stonehenge from the road. The ecolological damage is already clear and insupportable. The actions...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the plans to build a tunnel along the A303 to move the road from the environs of Stonehenge which would further damage this archealogically rich area.
I also feel that the...
Read more
-
My deep concerns about the application are as follows :
1. Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge, its archaeology and surroundings, eg Blick Mead Mesolithic site; it is...
Read more
-
I find it abhorrent that such a proposal is being muted.It flies in the face of all of our work to reduce carbon emissions by reducing vehicle use.This is a heritage site and is outstandingly...
Read more
-
I am convinced this is a serious threat to one of the most archaeologically important landscapes in the world.
I also think the loss of the view of Stonehenge from the existing road would reduce...
Read more
-
I think that this tunnel will seriously damage the sensitive and still undiscovered archaeology of the area. Interfere with the surrounding environment. All the groundwork & digging of a tunnel could...
Read more