Filter

A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1901 to 1925 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Thomas T. Gough

    Stonehenge and the surrounding area is probably the most important region of prehistoric monuments in the UK and perhaps in the world. It stands to reason that, in the region there remain, many as... Read more

  • Tim Mullett

    As an archaeology graduate, while I understand the desire and perhaps necessity to create an improved route for traffic on the A303 in the environs of Stonehenge, I am convinced that the current plans... Read more

  • Tina Johnston

    No to the road at Stonehenge world heritage site

  • Tom Owen

    The proposals do not adequately protect the landscape, the archeology, or the experience of a monument of national and global importance.

  • Tony Wingrove

    The destruction of neolithic sites. The destruction of ancient archilogical sites along the path of the proposed road. The closure of ancient rights of way.

  • Tracy Lee

    I am registering to become an Interested Party to take part in the Examination of the above application for development consent which has been submitted to the Planning Inspectorate. My reasons for... Read more

  • Trail Riders Fellowship (Trail Riders Fellowship)

    The Trail Riders Fellowship (“TRF”) responded to the consultation on 23 April 2018, and to the supplementary consultation on 13 August 2018. TRF objects to the application for the following... Read more

  • Trevad Griffin

    I firmly object to any major development around this important historical monument of world wide status and it would be a disaster to unearth land for roads any where near this site which has many... Read more

  • Trevor Grant

    As a regular user of this road, I am totally opposed to the tunnel. The cost would be an outrageous waste and could be much better spent on other needy projects in the area. The traffic chaos during... Read more

  • Valerie Wright

    I am very concerned about the proposed dual carriageway expressway past Stonehenge. This would potentially damage the World Heritage Site and the archaeological findings below Stone Henge. The... Read more

  • Vanessa Rigg

    I strongly OBJECT to this application. I agree with the Council for British Archaeology when they say : "... they will cause considerable damage to the surviving archaeological remains within the WHS... Read more

  • Vanita Eden

    I have always loved the Stonehenge site since my schooldays. It is at the core of my appreciation of heritage and that has value for me. I have visited a handful of times and been witness to the... Read more

  • Vicky Chapman

    I believe Stonehenge to be of significant international cultural, religious and spiritual value, not to mention its value to British history, which is unparalleled in the U.K. There is no other site... Read more

  • Vincent Haigh

    I wish to object to the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway in the strongest possible terms. UNESCO have described this World Heritage Site as a 'landscape without parallel' and its international... Read more

  • Wayne Hepworth

    I am against the project, and would make arguments against commencement on the following grounds: * Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. * UNESCO's advisers... Read more

  • Wendy Birse

    My concern is for the integrity and conservation of Stonehenge and the surrounding archaeological heritage. Irreversible damage will be done by the excavation and construction and incalculable future... Read more

  • Wendy Davis

    Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should NOT go ahead in... Read more

  • Wessex Regionalist - The Party for Wessex

    1. There are significant archaeological sites still being discovered including in the very areas HE intend to cut huge holes e.g. Blicks Mead, That this site has only recently been discovered clearly... Read more

  • Will Knocker

    UNESCO have objected to the new road, which will encroach upon a World Heritage Site. This is one of Britain's most iconic Historical Sites. Nature in all it's abundance on the site (thing... Read more

  • William Henry

    Please do not dig a tunnel underneath Stonehenge. Thank you.

  • Zoe Smith

    I would like to express my objection to the scheme as outlined below. I am concerned about damage to the World Heritage Site and Blick Mead Mesolithic site, their archaeology and setting. This... Read more

  • Zohreh Adle

    This work is not needed at all- we have enough mototlrways and the roads around Stonehenge are fine as is. I drive through frequently and never have any problems. Money wasted, and potentially an... Read more

  • A36/A350 Corridor Alliance (A36/A350 Corridor Alliance)

    Founded in 1993 the A36/A350 Corridor Alliance (ACA) is an umbrella group of organisations campaigning against damaging road schemes on a broad corridor of roughly NW alignment from the South Coast... Read more

  • Adam Scott

    I am not able to support the proposals as they will cause considerable damage to both the surviving archaeological remains within the WHS and the setting of key monuments within the landscape. This... Read more

  • Adam Spring

    The area around Stonehenge is a unique, irreplaceable landscape. Dramatic changes to this landscape could have a detrimental effect on the site's ecology, its archaeological value, its tranquillity... Read more