Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Dear Ms/Sir, I am writing to object to any extension of the A303 (or any other roads) around Stonehenge, as Stonehenge remains the most historic and well known of Britain s heritage sites....
Read more
-
The proposal by Highways England will involve irreparable damage to Britain's greatest historical landscape-including an interchange on the precise line of the midwinter solstice which we know now was...
Read more
-
The current plan does not adequately protect, and indeed will irreparably damage, this ancient landscape. There must be alternatives that will conserve it whilst improving transport links. However, it...
Read more
-
I strongly believe as I use this road to visit our buy to let properties we have in the West Country well overdue , and the right decision, both environmentally and asthethically
-
The traffic around Stonehenge is infamous, and I agree that some road building would be beneficial.
However, I am deeply concerned about the planned A303 expansion. I believe that the genuinely...
Read more
-
I believe that Stonehenge is incredibly important to understanding human English history, it has stood before modern roads existed and will stand for years after roads are discontinued. The land...
Read more
-
This plan risks serious damage to one of our most important heritage sites, and its surrounding fauna. Alternatives which would not damage the Henge have not been adequately explored and options...
Read more
-
I am responding on behalf of my constituents in South West England and many others who are deeply concerned about the A303 Stonehenge proposal and the Government’s general transport strategy which has...
Read more
-
I object to the construction and operation of this scheme and the resulting permanent detrimental effects on the World Heritage Site. The bypass should avoid the WHS completely if it is needed at all....
Read more
-
I think the Western Portal is too close to the Burial mounds and the Eastern Portal & too close to the Blickmead site and that there are problems with light pollution to the west and water tables to...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the permanent damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
-
This representation assumes that the Minutes of any meetings held with Highways England will be available to you specifically in relation to the difficulty the scheme as proposed presents in terms of...
Read more
-
I do not feel this underground tunnel is appropriate measure to deal with trafffic, in the area of international historic interest of Stonehenge.
-
• Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
• UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
• Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
I own plots 12-01, 12-03, 12-04, 03-03, 03-07, 03-08 and 03-10 and have an interest in plot 03-20. With the exception of plot 03-20 all of the other plots are scheduled for compulsory acquisition....
Read more
-
The plan would cause untold damage to this most important national monument and the surrounding area.
UNESCO are opposed to the proposal as it stands.
Blick Head could be irreparably damaged.
There...
Read more
-
I object to the new road-building project near the UNESCO World Heritage site of Stonehenge on the following grounds:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
...
Read more
-
The tunnel will be phenomenally expensive when all that is needed is a cutting The road would be removed from sight. The potential dangers of accidents within the tunnel with difficulties of access...
Read more
-
This project is so dangerous. It threatens so much that is and should be recognised as being important to England. Respect and conserve our history. Surely it is so irreplaceable which will be...
Read more
-
As a pagan and a practicing Priestess, I object strenuously to the proposed changes that would endanger this sacred site. I consider any such proposals to tunnel anywhere this site to be desecration...
Read more
-
This project is flawed and will have a devastating impact on a unique World Heritage Site. It must not go ahead.
[Redacted]
[redacted]
-
Dear Sir or Madame,
[Redacted]I absolutely object to this road scheme to drive the equivalent of a dual carriageway right underneath Stonehenge, a World Heritage Site, a designation which will be...
Read more
-
There is still so much for us to explore near Stonehenge, and a tunnel is wrong
-
I feel the Western Portal is too close to the Ancient burial Mounds and the Eastern too close to 'Blickmead' Archaeological site, and that there are issues with light pollution to the west and water...
Read more
-
Overwhelming concern re the following points:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more