Filter

A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1501 to 1525 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Phyllis Baker

    Firstly, any work near the site of Stonehenge would seriously interfere with the ambiance of this world heritage site that millions of people come from across the world to visit. Secondly work with... Read more

  • Project Allenby Connaught (Project Allenby Connaught)

    Project Allenby Connaught (PAC) is an MOD PFI with Aspire for the Garrisons on Salisbury Plain (Tidworth, Larkhill, Bulford). The Garrisons electricity supply is taken from the National Grid at... Read more

  • Rebecca Kersten

    Stonehenge is one of the wonders of the world and it is in our country. Do not spoil this amazing architectural wonder, leave it for furture generations to view and experience in all its glory.

  • Rescue, The British Archaeological Trust (Rescue, The British Archaeological Trust)

    Rescue is a non-political organisation dedicated to supporting archaeology. We receive no state support and are entirely dependent on the contributions of our members to support our work. We have been... Read more

  • Rhodri Evans

    Damage has already occurred to Blick Mead site during an exploratory examination. It's only likely that more damage will happen in furthering this tunneling. Surely a dual carriageway alongside the... Read more

  • Richard Hobbs

    Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’

  • Richard Mosley

    I am concerned that this site of national importance is being threatened

  • Richard Sebborn

    A massive flyover yards from my property will devalue it and my quality of life greatly. Also damage to Blick Mead is totally unacceptable.

  • Richard Stainer

    I am extremely concerned about the irreparable harm that will be caused to a unique site, recognised by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site. This site, which includes the whole of the surrounding area,... Read more

  • Robert Smith

    I believe the proposed development will irreversibly spoil the sacred nature of Stone Henge. I also believe the UK is at a population and infrastructure saturation point and our relatively small... Read more

  • Rosemary Norton

    The proposals will cause irremediable damage to the archaeological landscape of the Stonehenge WHS and its setting. This landscape has been described by UNESCO as a 'landscape without parallel'. ... Read more

  • Samantha Hamer

    This plan is vexatious as it damages part of a national heritage site and puts our sacred landscape at risk.

  • Sara Brough

    Stonehenge is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and should be protected from the dual carriageway that has been proposed to be built around it. HIGHWAYS ENGLAND SHOULD SCRAP THIS IDEA NOW AND RESPECT OUR... Read more

  • Saskia Kent

    I strongly object to the proposal for the tunnel. I believe it will cause irrepairable harm to this extremely important world heritage site, indeed it has already damaged important archeology with... Read more

  • Simon Appleyard

    Stonehenge is the whole area and it's landscape and environs. Wanton destruction of this should be a criminal act

  • Simon Brough

    Fao Highways England re project A303 STONEHENGE Cancel this scheme immediately and preserve a UNESCO World Heritage Site from traffic pollution and noise. OUR ANCIENT HERITAGE IS AT STAKE

  • Simon Middlecote

    Unacceptable intervention in a world heritage site at odds with advice given by UNESCO

  • Simon Pemberton

    2 public consultations have overwhelmingly rejected the plans for the Stone Henge Highway yet you are pushing it through. At best this is undemocratic with going into any environmental & historical... Read more

  • Steph Windsor

    Damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form and if it... Read more

  • Stephen Plant

    Not only is the site important for Britain, it is a UNESCO world heritage site and as such should remain as is, the setting is as important as the stones themselves. It is also an important site for... Read more

  • Steve Gore

    I object to the current plans for the tunnel by Stonehenge. There has been inadequate protection given for the site with major archeological loss with the proposal as it stands. Any tunnel must be of... Read more

  • Steve Howe

    As the proposal is so potentially damaging and that damage will be irreversible my main concern is that there is no alternative. Until there is an Alternative to consider which does not endanger rare... Read more

  • Stormie Mills

    I u derstand that this new proposed tunnel will mean that the stones cannot be seen from the road, that “Tunner’s View” sketch of them, part of the UK’s cultural history & mystery will be gone... Read more

  • Stuart Riches

    I've been to sunrise at the henge near summer solstice. It's in our bones. Please do not trash it.

  • Terry Jennings

    The cost is exhorbetent for the return at times of austerity we should not be financing cosmetic projects there will also be detrimental effects on the adjacent areas due to the digging etc and... Read more