Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The A303 Expressway is likely to do untold damage to ancient sites and artefacts that are believed to lie in abundance around the Stonehenge area. This is an unacceptable sacrifice of historic remains...
Read more
-
I object to the lack of true consultation regarding the broader landscape aesthetics of this WHO site. There is also a broader issue regarding the wider archaeology of this pre historically important...
Read more
-
I object to the express way as I believe it will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting. I'm also concerned about damage to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting...
Read more
-
I object vehemently to the proposal for the A303 at Stonehenge. It has already been stated that the works necessary for completion and the proposed traffic load will cause irreparable damage to this...
Read more
-
i feel this application risks irrepairable damage to Stonehenge and its environs. The surrounding area is vital in providing a context for understanding and appreciating the monument itself. That...
Read more
-
Simply to the the layman the whole stonehenge landscape we are proposing should now be classified as a national park for future generations to experience.
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage site,so it should be left alone,but the damage the road will cause to wildlife and air quality is important,as wildlife numbers are decreasing.
-
I feel that not only is this a complete and utter waste of money, but it will obstruct the view of Stonehenge from the road, which is such a shame as Stonehenge is a historic landmark that should be...
Read more
-
I object to the building of a tunnel near Stonehenge,because it is a timeless national and world heritage site which should not be subject to the whims of the present government policy. The proposal...
Read more
-
I am [redacted]. The current plans to closed all the byways and put in a tunnel will mean I can no longer access Stonehenge at all. I am unable to use the English heritage "accessible" buses, they are...
Read more
-
I wish to add my name to the representations regarding alterations to the area around Stonehenge. The stones are not the only historic artefacts at risk. The surrounding landscape still has much to...
Read more
-
This site was built by OUR ancestors and should be respected, once the road has been built there will be no turning back. Please reconsider and give this site the respect and tranquility away from...
Read more
-
I am a university professor (Exeter), a widely published author (including books on the English seasons and the history of the Union Jack), Hon. President of the Campaign for the Protection of Rural...
Read more
-
I'm frankly aghast that this proposal is even being considered. UNESCO has declared the area a "landscape without parallel". The proposed expressway endangers the habitat of rare species like the...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site. The proposed works will affect the energy of the land in a very negative way and any underground tunnelling or development should not be permitted.
-
My concerns include:
that the scheme has not taken into consideration other viable options
which would protect the rare bird species including the Stone Curlew.
Increased pollution from faster...
Read more
-
The grounds for my objection are simply that the whole of the Stonehenge environs and their milieu form an ancient 'funerary landscape' which is not limited merely to the Stones themselves but...
Read more
-
Stonehenge has stood for 12,500 years. The internal combustion engine, which is less than 150 years old, relies on fossil fuel which is finite and will probably be exhausted before the motor car...
Read more
-
The A303 Stonehenge project as proposed by Highways England will result in significant and irreversible damage to the Stonehenge cultural landscape including a vast portion of the UNESCO World...
Read more
-
The proposed development does not represent value for money for the public purse, the local topography could easily hide the road from Stonehenge without the need to tunnel and expend vast amounts of...
Read more
-
This is a world-renowned Heritage site which will likely suffer irrepairable damage by the development. This is also a concern of the UNESCO advisers.
It will also mean an increase in noise levels...
Read more
-
The proposed route of the A303 is too close to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and will cause irreparable damage to the site. UNESCO have advised that the A303 should not go ahead as currently...
Read more
-
I drive the A303 past Stonehenge every time I visit my parents, so I have a vested interest in improving the traffic.
However, I object to the scheme because:
1. I believe it will cause...
Read more
-
Anything threatening to obstruct, dwarf or polloute this WHR is wholly unacceptable. Alternatives must be considered - if not for the WHR then for the rare species like Great Bustard in the vacinity.
-
Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form and we all have serious concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more