Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
“Couldn't find the freeway, had to take a backstreet called the M5.”
US Tourist explaining why they had arrived late for dinner in the Waldorf Salad episode of the classic comedy series Fawlty...
Read more
-
A waste of money, siphoning off a national asset, denying a free view for the public
-
I wish to oppose the application on the following grounds:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its...
Read more
-
Brian Edwards, Visiting Research Fellow, The Regional History Centre, University of the West of England, Bristol.
Deputy representative of the Avebury and Stonehenge Archaeological and Historical...
Read more
-
• UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form and I would agree with them.
-
I am concerned that the excavations for this project will irretrievably damage this UNESCO world heritage site. There have already been reports that the initial groundwork has had an effect and I do...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
There are many reasons why the tunnel should not be allowed to proceed inc the following in no order of importance or priority
1 Current cost is bound to escalate which cannot be justified in present...
Read more
-
I am registering as an objector to the current proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge.
The NNNPS section 5.129 requires that decision makers take into account "the particular nature of the...
Read more
-
lack of respect and protection for a sacred landscape
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international...
Read more
-
The A303 at Stonehenge is promoted as being part of a programme of improvements to unlock benefits for the South West economy, local communities and the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS). However,...
Read more
-
As a British citizen following the ancient religious ways of my Ancestors. I frequently use the areas commonly known as Stonehenge and Avebury circle for my religeous ceremonies (it is a place where I...
Read more
-
Dear Sir or Madam, I have registered concerning Stonehenge Heritage Landscape. The reason why is simply because, I actually protest against the Architecture construction plan to go ahead. To be frank...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site. UNESCO's advisers have stated that the planned scheme should not go ahead, and no acceptable plans have been made. Blick Mead Mesolithic site would be damaged,...
Read more
-
I wish to object to this proposal in the strongest possible terms. The dual carriageway would do irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site which UNESCO describes as "without parallel" and its...
Read more
-
1) I object to this Proposal on the grounds of the inevitable major disturbance, probable irreversible damage & possible destruction to an ancient & irreplaceable monument that the proposal will...
Read more
-
Stone Henge is an extremely important national heritage site that should be preserved and not compromised in any way. It belongs to the people of Great Britain and the area should not be interfered...
Read more
-
I believe that this world heritage site would be ruined...that endangered species would be lost.There are alternatives that have not been heard.
-
The plan will damage archaeology, as yet undiscovered above and below ground.
It will reduce opportunities for viewing Stonehenge from a distance, such as that from the present A303.
It will entail...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that such major construction is proposed for this work heritage site. The economic case is flawed: the problem very likely overstated and the case put forward fails to allow for...
Read more
-
destruction to historic sites of national and international importance
more and faster traffic
knock on effects to lead to ever more wider and higher capacity roads on this route and feeder roads...
Read more
-
I and my family have visited Stonehenge many times since I was a boy living in Dorset some 60 years ago, so I have a personal interest in trying to improve the local area to achieve a better...
Read more
-
My representation will cover the following issues:
- Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
- UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
UNESCO does not approve of the current scheme, this alone should be a huge red flag against the scheme as it stands.
The site is unique and only if the archaeology is preserved can it be subject to...
Read more
-
I am very concerned at the risk of irreparable harm being done to a unique archaeological site.