Filter
A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1676 to 1700 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Claire Kime

    UNESCO object to this scheme and other options have not been adequately explored or represented.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Claire Mellish

    This is a World Heritage Site and it is also of great historical, cultural and emotional significance to all British citizens. Unfortunately this scheme is exclusive in nature, effectively putting... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Claire Nahmad

    Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. Concerns about damage to Blick Mead... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Colin Jones

    I am a concerned individual, and frequent user of the A303. I don't believe these works are justifiable to save a few minute's jorney time. I am concerned about permanent damage to the World Heritage... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Colleen I Spalding

    I do not think that Highways England should persist in its idea to put a large duel carriage way in place which will negatively impact on the UNESCO / Stonehenge World Heritage Site. I have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Council for British Archaeology (Council for British Archaeology)

    The Council for British Archaeology has long maintained an interest in the protection, conservation, management and public understanding of the Stonehenge & Avebury World Heritage Site (WHS). We... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Council of British Druid Orders (CoBDO) (Council of British Druid Orders (CoBDO))

    1 . Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a "landscape without parallel", particularly in regard to the western section between the cut and Longbarrow... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • CPRE South West (Campaign to Protect Rural England) (CPRE South West (Campaign to Protect Rural England))

    CPRE SW represents the seven county branches in the South West of England and thousands of individual CPRE members. These comments add to and reiterate the concerns/objections already stated in our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Dan Lawrence

    Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Daniel J Teague

    My reason for completing this form include: Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Daniel Miller

    1 - there is no clear evidence road congestion will be improved 2 - there is too much focus on 'bronze age henge' and not enough planning for mitigation of impacts on multiperiod landscape and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Darrielle Devese Jenkins

    No permanent plans to put through anything that could damage the site any further. It' had historic and ancient burial ground and should not be distributed in any way that could damage it and destroy... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Dave Wallace

    The WHS is of global significance and much of the surrounding land has lain undisturbed and without proper academic archaeological investigation. The merits of a poorly located road build out are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • David Atkin

    My main complaint is that this scheme in its current form irreparably damage the Stonehenge landscape for thousands of years to come and destroy fragile archaeology there needs to be preserved for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • David Barthram

    I am concerned that the plans for the A303 near Stonehenge will, if they are approved, cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting and concerned about damage to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • David Boston

    Driving a road through this area would lead to a loss of knowledge and area which would be a catostrophe.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • David Ford

    This is an OBJECTION to the scheme for a number of reasons but principally the irreparable damage this will cause to the archaeology and site setting including Blick Mead Mesolithic Site. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • David Holland Smith

    I am concerned if it is the case that the decision to proceed with this work is being taken without approval from UNESCO. Since one stated objective for the work is to restore the World Heritage Site... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • David Thalenberg

    Stonehenge is probably the most recognisable, iconic and well-regarded prehistoric site in the world. To construct a tunnel under it would both threaten o damage it, from the construction work itself,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Davinia Baldwin

    If the application for the dual carriage way is allowed to go ahead it will result in .Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, Stonehenge both in terms of its archaeology and setting. .... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Davy King

    I am seriously concerned about permanent damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. I am also worried about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting. UNESCO's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Debi Lysaght

    Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Debi Richens

    These are all of my concerns: Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. Concerns about... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Deborah Lee

    I am concerned about the impact that the proposed works will have on the environment in an area of outstanding natural beauty I believe that it is wrong to deprive people a free view of such an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019

  • Deborah Walsh

    This road would mean irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 January 2019