Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am interested on how on earth you can carry out a zero carbon construction of a major project of this size.
-
I believe that the new crossing is in the wrong place and will only lead to further congestion, pollution and accidents. Moreover, I am confident in saying that the location has been chosen to make...
Read more
-
1. Traffic pollution, noise and light pollution when complete. 2. The destruction of millions of cubic meters of land and with it, the environment it sustains. 3. The disruption to the people of...
Read more
-
I am very pleased that the Lower Thames Crossing has received Planning Permission. The recent increase in Traffic in the lanes of Kent makes it imperative that the Trunk roads are able to cope with...
Read more
-
The main points of my objection are: 1. The degradation of air quality, estimated 6.6million tonnes of carbon emissions 2. Biodiversity and woodland targets for the surrounding areas of East Tilbury...
Read more
-
As the Port Authority closest to the Southern side of the project, we are very keen to make sure the Port of Sheerness is represented to support all aspects of the Lower Thames Crossing and the local...
Read more
-
We support the Lower Thames Crossing project as a vital piece of infrastructure for road resilience and contingency planning when other routes are unable to be used. We believe it will have economical...
Read more
-
As a resident of Thurrock I object to this development on the grounds that it will lead to more traffic through my borough and thereby a degradation in air quality.
-
I think that option C would be a waste of money and would only elevate the traffic congestion at the Dartford crossing by 14% and that is because most of the traffic (86%)travels around London so I...
Read more
-
Please see attached.
-
We represent the residents of Upminster and Cranham. Our representation will highlight the potential downside effects for our residents of the new roads linking to the Lower Thames Crossing both in...
Read more
-
I am concerned that a massive infrastructure and tunneling project like this Lower Thames Crossing does not include a rail tunnel. Linking the rail networks of the east of England with the south east...
Read more
-
will be in relation to :- degree of potential disruption to existing road traffic movement in N Kent whether new roads & tunnels being planned are of sufficient capacity for future usage how long the...
Read more
-
In the first instance, I am in favour of the project for a lower Thames crossing point. My main objection and fear, is that the project will run over time and over budget. I sincerely trust that the...
Read more
-
I am an interested party because I live near the Dartford Tunnels and their various approach roads and am heartily fed up with the chaos caused to the surrounding area when there is a problem at the...
Read more
-
This project is essential for the future and I wish to participate in its development. I am an affected person and an interested party.
-
In my humble opinion I think that the proposed project is to close to the QE2 bridge and will create more problems than it will solve
-
It is accepted that Annex B of document 4.1 (Statement of Reasons) includes Cranham Golf Course Ltd (No 210) and Cranham Solar Ltd (No 211) and that the document schedules negotiations that have taken...
Read more
-
The LTC is not fit for purpose. The pollution in this area is way too high. The junction where the LTC joins the M25 is to close to the junction of the A127 also very close to junction of the A12...
Read more
-
This is a vital development which will obviously have upsides and downsides. It seems that environmental issues are being taken into account but there will of course, be some things that upset people....
Read more
-
Melburg have various land holdings within the area and are interested to see how these may be impacted by the ongoing proposals
-
Insufficient attention has been made to the environmental issues concerning this development
-
My client is principally concerned about the impact on their residential amenity of noise emanating from the development and the impact that the development will have on the value of their property.
-
My principal objections to this project are the 1. the impact on the local community and the environment 2. the amount of greenbelt being taken 3. the Tilbury Viaduct section which has not been shown...
Read more
-
I am concerned that there is no provision to link the crossing to the M20. I have said this in previous submissions. Only providing more crossing capacity is not enough if the traffic then pours onto...
Read more
-
My concerns are that: . The road will destroy a lot of natural habitat . This area was abused in the past by industry but over the last 50 years has been rehabilitated and I fear the new road will...
Read more
-
As a regular user of the current Thames crossing at Dartford I am interested in how the LTC can be of benefit to me. I am also interested in improved flow of Heavy Goods vehicles across the river.
-
The Dartford crosssing will still remain over capacity.The Lower Thames crossing will cause pollution have huge impacts on the environment thousands of acres ancient woodland, green belt and prime...
Read more
-
The crossing is absolutely essential to relieve QE bridge and Blackwall tunnel to ease Kent being a giant car park that spoils an otherwise beautiful county.
-
I did not buy near a main road due to health issues. You now plan to put 8lanes of traffic right outside my home. Health will now suffer. Would not solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford...
Read more
-
Wish to be kept informed on the traffic impact on the roads I use on a daily basis. A13, A127
-
The crossing benefits the residents of Kent The surrounding infrastructure is considered within project and potential upgrades are reviewed in light of increased or different traffic flow.
-
My area of concern is the impact the proposed crossing will have on the increase in volume of traffic that we will experience in the Swale area, IE north & south of the M2 / A249 junction. Traffic...
Read more
-
My concern is the loss of green land being replaced with concrete. Too much emphasis on roads at a time when we are trying to discourage the use of vehicles.
-
The Lower Thames Crossing will not solve the problems at the Dartford Crossing. The Dartford Crossing will still be over capacity. The Lower Thames Crossing will have a devastating affect on the...
Read more
-
The Lower Thames Crossing should not be built It is too expensive will create too much CO2 increase pollution in an area that is already over the limit will disrupt the whole area will cause traffic...
Read more
-
We object to the project on the grounds that it will cause an increase in motor traffic and pollution both generally and on local roads feeding the new crossing and make it more difficult for the UK...
Read more
-
Possible extra high traffic volumes in my area causing more congestion
-
My interest is an an occasional traveller using the Dartford Crossing and wish to continue a close interest in developments, and have the opportunity to contribute as appropriate.
-
500 words is woefully insufficient to cover in any detail my submissions opposing this project. However, I will be submitting detailed objections covering the Ecological, Environmental, Economic and...
Read more
-
I will be opposing this proposed roadbuilding project on Ecological, Environmental, Economic and Financial grounds. I will also be challenging the actual Cost and associated lack of Project Viability...
Read more
-
I am currently the borough ward councillor for Cobham and Luddesdown and helped to represent my community during the lengthy LTC consultation process. However I am also a resident of Cobham on the...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about Climate Change and the amount of Carbon this infrastructure scheme will generate during construction and ongoing. I am also very concerned about the cost of the scheme and...
Read more
-
Badgers live in close knit communities, often referred to as "clans", with each clan having it's own territory and setts which are often defended against incursions by members of others clans. In our...
Read more
-
I wish as an individual resident of Dartford show my whole hearted support for this scheme, an opinion I think is little or never voiced. It's a vital piece of infrastructure for the region and needs...
Read more
-
As a local resident, I have views on the planned development, process and benefits proposed from this solution. It is clear that the costs of the project has increased significantly and that the...
Read more
-
Thurrock Power Limited (“TPL”) has the benefit of a development consent order for a flexible generation plant, granted in February 2022 (“TPL DCO”). The TPL DCO consents a combination of reciprocating...
Read more
-
As I live local I would like this project to go ahead as I know it would relieve heavy traffic on to and off the A2, M2, Dartford Crossing and surrounding roads through Gravesend.
-
This scheme will not solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing. Scheme does not take into account other possible developments in the local area, ie theme park proposal on the Northfleet...
Read more
-
I object to this proposed development on the basis that it will cause irretrievable and lasting environmental damage in an age where there is more and more awareness of the lasting effects that...
Read more