Filter
M3 Junction 9 Improvement

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 75 of 106 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Hampshire County Council (Hampshire County Council)

    Hampshire County Council (The Council) is a host authority for this application, with specific interests relating to local highway impact, Lead Local Flood Authority and Countryside Access (Public... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 9 March 2023

  • Daniel Lee

    We have a climate and biodiversity crisis inc. consequences of the aforementioned on our health and well-being plus wider nature. These crises require a comprehensive comparative analysis of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 March 2023

  • Hampshire Chamber of Commerce (Hampshire Chamber of Commerce)

    M3 Junction 9 Improvement - very important and vital for the area.

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 March 2023

  • Historic England (Historic England)

    Historic England (retaining the formal title of the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England) is the government service championing England’s heritage and giving expert, constructive... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 10 March 2023

  • Jonathan William Muir

    I am the owner of a property which is at [] and includes approximately one mile of the River Itchen and is an SSSI. The property is accessed via the A33 and will be impacted by the proposed project.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 March 2023

  • BNP Paribas Real Estate (BNP Paribas Real Estate) on behalf of Royal Mail

    Royal Mail (RM) does not have an in principle objection to this proposed road scheme but is seeking to secure mitigations to protect its operations during the construction phase. Under section 35 of... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 March 2023

  • South Downs National Park Authority (South Downs National Park Authority)

    Approximately 62% of the proposed Scheme area falls within the South Downs National Park and the majority of the remaining Scheme area is within the setting of the National Park. In summary, the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 March 2023

  • UK Health Security Agency (UK Health Security Agency)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 10 March 2023

  • Alison Moore

    We live close to this junction and my concern is the increase in noise, traffic polution plus increase in traffic that may divert through our area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Brian Walter Langer

    1 I'm a regular user of this A33/A34/M3 junction. 2 I am especially interested in plans to free flow from A33/A34 to M3 southbound and northbound. 3 I am eager to see the final plans for separating... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Clare Reynolds

    This is unethical. The carbon footprint of this project is very high. We don't need a bigger motorway we need investment in our local roads which are blighted by potholes and we need better bus... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Deirdre Hartz

    Huge environmental impact.Spend on more pressing projects.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Elizabeth Braakenburg Dyce

    Do not see that the need for this scheme has been established

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Helen Feeney

    In the midst of a climate and biodiversity emergency, this road building project does not make sense. The investment would be better spent on public transport or cycling infrastructure.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Jacqueline Porter

    As the County Councillor the the Itchen Valley Division, the impact of the M3 junction 9 proposals both during construction, and in operation will have a huge effect on residents in my division. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Judith Lowndes

    Many of the roads in my vicinity are in a very poor condition with potholes, cracks and deep drops at the sides which have caused damage to my and my family's cars and could potentially cause injury.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Linda Diane Groves

    I believe this junction construction to be a waste of money saving little time for commuters such as myself, and causing more chaos on the M27 following years of upheaval as the smart motorway was... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Michael Hart

    This project is environmentally hostile to wildlife and plant life, and will during its construction cause much carbon dioxide to be emitted. And the extra cars using it will too Spend the money on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Michael Nell

    This scheme encourages road traffic and will release massive volumes of carbon dioxide with the extensive use of concrete. Both of these are incompatible with reaching net zero by 2030

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Naomi Bryer

    Money could be better spent on up keep in roads and the local area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Sarah Gooding

    This project is not compatible with the UK commitment to net zero. The CCCC has said we must stop road infrastructure building in order to reduce emissions. It will make little difference to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Simon Burgess

    This is a waste of money which should be better spent on public transport. The idea is outmoded and old fashioned. You are polishing a turd. The transport policy is broken if you have to resort to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 March 2023

  • Amy Battersby Harford

    The amount of money necessary to make this change is not worth the outcome. It would be much more useful if it went into something more people could appreciate, such as a relief scheme for people... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 March 2023

  • Catherine Goldring

    I am a landowner whose property lies alongside the A34. My land includes a SSSI - it adjoins Winnall Moor. I am concerned to know the precise details of the plans to protect & not jeopardise this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 March 2023

  • Catherine Tuffrey

    I am very concerned about the use of a huge amount to tax payers' money, better spent on reducing car travel, not increasing it. This is bad for the planet as well as the local air quality in our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 March 2023