Filter
M3 Junction 9 Improvement

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 76 to 100 of 106 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Itchen Valley Parish Council (Itchen Valley Parish Council)

    General Interest This project will be taking place in part within The Civil Parish of the Itchen Valley. Itchen Valley Parish Council is one of the largest Parish Councils in the Winchester District.... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 12 March 2023

  • Michael Robinson

    I am a local resident that lives next to the motorway. I have concerns about how the change to four lanes will impact on noise and pollution for me and my fellow residents. I am interested to explore... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 March 2023

  • RJM Land Investments Ltd (RJM Land Investments Ltd)

    RJM is landowner of farmland/water meadows alongside the A34. The land includes part of the Barton Carrier river & is a SSSI - it adjoins Winnall Moor. I am concerned to know the precise details of... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 12 March 2023

  • Rupert Cyril Pitt

    It is contrary to the local council (Winchester City Council and Hampshire County Council) Declarations of Climate Emergency and their action plans It will not solve any congestion problem The road... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 March 2023

  • Winchester Green Party (Winchester Green Party)

    We object this project because: - it will lead to increased carbon dioxide emissions and air pollution by increasing car traffic accross the region - it will increase noise pollution - it will... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 12 March 2023

  • 20s plenty for Hampshire (20s plenty for Hampshire)

    I would like to support the position held by WinACC. This scheme is only likely to create induced demand, increase pollution and take much needed funding away from active travel. I am unconvinced that... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Anne Robinson

    I object to this scheme as it will lead to an increase in traffic and carbon emissions. In the Environmental Statement National Highways say the scheme would cause an extra 37,070 tonnes of carbon... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Chris Todd

    I strongly object to this development and the impact it will have on the South Downs National Park and local communities through air and noise pollution, visual impact and climate change. At a time... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Climate Emergency Planning and Policy (Climate Emergency Planning and Policy )

    Dr Andrew Boswell, Climate Emergency Planning and Policy I am an independent environmental consultant. I object to the M3 Junction 9: (1) The most important question is “to what extent does the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Cllr Paula Ferguson

    I would like to raise concerns about noise, disruption and deterioration in air quality for local residents living vary close to the junction and in the surrounding roads.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Eastleigh Borough Council (Eastleigh Borough Council)

    As a neighbouring Local Authority we would like to register as an interested party in order to keep track of the application and assess any impacts on local residents and the local environment. These... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Environment Agency (Environment Agency)

    Our ref: HA/2023/124853/02 Your ref: TR010055 Date: 13 March 2023 Dear Sir or Madam, Application by National Highways Company Limited for an Order Granting Development Consent for the M3 Junction 9... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Hampshire Countryside Access Forum (Hampshire Countryside Access Forum)

    Hampshire Countryside Access Forum (HCAF) is an independent statutory body with members who represent the views of recreational users, land managers and others with an interest in countryside access.... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Headbourne Worthy Parish Council (Headbourne Worthy Parish Council )

    I’m concerned that active travel has not been prioritised appropriately.

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • James Batho

    A city councillor in a ward affected by the M3 J9 project.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Jane Rutter

    As a local City and Parish Councillor I am keen to ensure that the impacts of noise, disruption of local traffic and air quality are properly assessed and mitigated.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • New Forest District Council (New Forest District Council)

    New Forest District Council recognises that there are unlikely to be any direct impacts on its communities. Nevertheless, the wider implications of the project on the strategic highway network... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Richard Cannon

    To ensure the project is really worth it and if it goes ahead will it be another HS2 and stop halfway leaving a mess for whatever time it takes to get the money to carry on. Also similar to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Richard Dilwyn Hawker

    This is a massive increase in width of the motorway, effectively doubling in size. Although the plan is to create 'species-rich' grassland, etc, the fact is that land is being taken to build this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Richard Needham

    £200 million could be better spent on things with a positive impact rather than the negative impact this scheme will produce. We need to have fewer cars on the roads, not make space for more. I am... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Southampton City Council (Southampton City Council)

    The A34/M3 Junction 9 scheme will provide strategic access to the Port of Southampton on the important Midlands-Solent corridor for freight. Reliability and congestion at this junction has been... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Southern Water (Southern Water)

    This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of Southern Water Services Limited (“SWS”). SWS is the appointed water undertaker under the Water Industry Act 1991 for certain areas in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Suzanne White

    As a local resident and motorist, I do not see a need for this development. I use this junction regularly and the improvements it will make to the journey are minimal in the light of the huge cost of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Thomas Rogers

    These are my remaining comments from the 2021 consultation that I would like to enter into the Examination: 1/ Why has the existing R&W materials compound site situated right next to Junction 9... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023

  • Transport Action Network (Transport Action Network )

    Transport Action Network objects to the DCO application as the Applicant acknowledges the scheme would lead to increases in traffic and carbon emissions. This will make it more difficult fir tge UK to... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 13 March 2023