Filter
A66 Northern Trans-Pennine Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 26 to 50 of 231 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Crackenthorpe Parish Meeting (Crackenthorpe Parish Meeting)

    The Parish meeting is strongly opposed to changes made in February 2022, without consultation in Appleby, removing the westbound A66 access road from the largest settlement in the Eden Valley, Appleby... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 16 August 2022

  • Cumbria and Lakes Joint Local Access Forum (Cumbria and Lakes Joint Local Access Forum)

    The representation I will make on behalf of the Cumbria & Lakes Joint Local Access Forum will address matters relating to the alternative provisions to be made for pedestrians, horse riders and pedal... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 16 August 2022

  • Lesley Kelly

    The change of plan in February 2022 was inadequately consulted on or advertised locally. Is not in keeping with National Highways purpose regarding safety of local and transient road users. Disregards... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 August 2022

  • Howard Charlesworth

    I am concerned about the Rokeby Junction on the upgrading of the A66. No one I know agrees with the Highways England option of the "Black" route which moves the junction well to the West of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 August 2022

  • Celia Chapple

    The plan to route traffic through The Sills into Barnard Castle (from A66) is not the best route of the routes on offer. It is a road used by pedestrians as part of the town landscape and has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 August 2022

  • Daniel Thwaites PLC (Daniel Thwaites PLC)

    This representation should be read in conduction with the feedback already submitted to Highways England on 4th November 2021 as part of the initial consolation. Whilst we recognise the benefits the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 August 2022

  • Iain Waite

    The proposed route of the new dual carriageway will pass about 300 metres from our cottage. There will be parts in cut and parts on embankment in our vicinity so we are concerned about the impact of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 August 2022

  • Walton Goodland Ltd (Walton Goodland Ltd) on behalf of Dr. Antony Richard Leeming (Dr. Antony Richard Leeming )

    IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS A66 NORTHERN TRANS-PENNINE PROJECT DEVEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER APPLICATION AND IN THE MATTER OF LAND TO BE ACQUIRED PERMANENTLY AT [Redacted]... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2022

  • John Robinson

    We live on the route chosen by Highways England for access to Barnard Castle from a new junction on the A66. This route involves traffic travelling through Startforth on a very narrow road with only... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2022

  • Alex Jakob-Whitworth

    I live locally and use the surrounding area between Penrith and Kirkby Stephen as part of my work. There will be a serious impact to our pace of life, to wildlife and habitats. There are issues with... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 August 2022

  • Jennifer White

    I believe that Highways England's decision to follow the Black route is significantly flawed and will cause substantial harm to the local area and community greatly outweighing harm that would be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 August 2022

  • Paula Carlington

    We live on the route chosen by Highways England for access to Barnard Castle from a new junction on the A66. This route involves traffic travelling through Startforth on a very narrow road with only... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 August 2022

  • Transport Action Network (Transport Action Network)

    Transport Action Network would like to register as an Interested Party for the A66 Examination. The proposed scheme would 1) increase traffic growth and carbon emissions by 2,190,452 tonnes over its... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 20 August 2022

  • Anthony Metcalfe

    At the initial stage 3 schemes were considered A66 A66 + A685 A69 The A685 (including Kirkby Stephen bypass option) was discarded on the basis of incorrect information 1) The scheme was priced at 88... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 August 2022

  • Barrie Cheetham

    I object to increasing traffic flow south of Penrith between Kemplay Roundabout on the A6 and junction M40 on the M6. An alternative route must be found for north to south and south to north traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 August 2022

  • Constance Blackett-Ord

    I would like to register as an interested party, as a local resident and outline my objections to the proposed A66 scheme. 1. Environmental- It has been calculated that the proposed scheme would... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 August 2022

  • Emma Tristram

    I object to this scheme because it would increase traffic growth and carbon emissions, when we need to achieve 68% reductions in UK carbon emissions by 2030 under our legally binding commitments under... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 August 2022

  • Robin Russell

    I have been representing West Layton residents in the Community Liaison Group meetings convened by the Highways Project Team. The consultation inputs from various residents in the village have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 August 2022

  • Barningham Parish Meeting (Barningham Parish Meeting)

    As the village of Barningham does not have a Parish Council the Parish Meeting is the represntative body for its residents. On 4 November 2021 I submitted an objection to National Highways on behalf... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Campaign for National Parks (Campaign for National Parks)

    We object to TRO10062 for the following reasons: The proposal fails to take account of the additional protections that apply in National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Center Parcs (Center Parcs)

    As an organisation Center Parcs fully support this project as it will benefit our staff of 1450 from a travel perspective, our guests of approximately 10,000 per week and it will most definitely save... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Cross Lanes to Rokeby Community Liaison Group (Cross Lanes to Rokeby Community Liaison Group)

    That the proposed junction and route at the East end of the Cross Lanes to Rokeby section of the upgrade, the 'Black Route' does not recognise the harms it will impose on Startforth and the lower... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Phillip Gate on behalf of East Layton Parish

    The majority of residents of East Layton do not want a junction on Moor Lane in the new A66 projewct. Moor Lane will attract an increased daily flow of vehicles which will all come through the village... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Bill Lloyd on behalf of Mr Billy Welch

    The proposed route of the development passes through the site of Brough Hill Fair. In 1330 the town of Brough was granted a charter for, inter alia, an annual four day fair which remains as Brough... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Transport for the North (Transport for the North)

    Transport for the North (TfN) is a Sub-national Transport Body (STB) with a statutory power to advise UK Government on the transport priorities for the North of England. Our advice reflects the views... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022