Filter
A66 Northern Trans-Pennine Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 50 of 231 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Louise Taylor-Kenyon

    There are differences between the final consultation documents given in March 2022 and shown on the A66 Northern Trans Pennine route website in the Map Book, and the plans sent to the Planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2022

  • Mrs Elaine Waddington

    Our home is adjacent to the A66 and will be affected by the proposed road improvement both during the carrying out of the work and also afterwards. I an worried that some of the land being used for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2022

  • Raymond Waddington

    I am concerned about the construction work to upgrade Kemplay roundabout and underpass and how it may affect us in the construction. I am led to believe that the construction period is 4 years and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 August 2022

  • Jill Collins

    I am concerned that route chosen at Rokeby will lead to increased traffic on the Sills, due to a 1.5 mile detour for Westbound traffic to Barnard Castle. This road is narrow and winding, with narrow... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 August 2022

  • The British Horse Society (The British Horse Society)

    The BHS would currently object to the DCO application submitted by National Highways on the grounds that equestrians are being marginalised in the scheme with walkers and cyclists being favoured.... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 3 August 2022

  • Stephen Hammersley

    I am involved as a volunteer and funder of the community farm being established at Dyke Nook near Sandford. The plans as I understand them have not taken into account the views of local people that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 August 2022

  • Alexandra Thomson

    I wish to object to the current plans to dual a section of the A66 between Rokeby and Cross Lanes and in the way it will send more traffic along the Sills into Barnard Castle. As a resident of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 August 2022

  • Dr C Midcalf

    I strongly object to your current proposals. I am still in favor of your original Blue route option.Your current proposal will not keep the current balance of traffic into Barnard Castle. Your... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 August 2022

  • Stephen D. Roberts

    I have two matters to raise as follows. The plan received from you via post, shows three boxes. In the box 01 the red line surrounds a field running south and reaching down to the River Greta. May I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 August 2022

  • British Horse Society North Yorkshire (British Horse Society North Yorkshire)

    Comments Relate to Scheme 09 Stephen Bank to Carkin Moor TR010062 Rights of Way and Access Plans - the comments are on behalf of the British Horse Society. The provision at Carkin Moor Farm as shown... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 August 2022

  • Patricia Rogers

    I am concerned about land being taken from my property for farm access with the new revised plan. This was not on the previous plan! Also what screening and noise prevention measures will be put in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 August 2022

  • Paul Taylor

    Concerns over layout of junction for Flitholme and Langrigg on initial draft.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 August 2022

  • Warcop Parish Council (Warcop Parish Council)

    I represent the Warcop Parish Council, which includes Warcop, Sandford, Bleatarn and part of Coupland Beck. We broadly welcome the plans to dual all remaining single carriageway sections of the A66,... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 8 August 2022

  • Anne Robinson

    I object to this scheme TR010062 on the following grounds: • Greatly increased carbon emissions at a time when they should be radically reduced. No evidence is provided that the scheme is compatible... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 August 2022

  • Eddie Peat

    This concerns the Cross Lanes to Rokeby section. The scheme should extend eastwards to include the Wycliffe junction at Thorpe Grange Farm. This is a junction off the existing dual carriageway which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 August 2022

  • Romaldkirk Parish Council (Romaldkirk Parish Council)

    Romaldkirk Parish Council objects to the proposals for the Rokeby junction of the A66 dualling project. Having been advised of the forecasted increase in traffic travelling to/from Barnard Castle via... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 9 August 2022

  • Russ Thomas

    (i) That all cycleways/footpath are joined together for continuity of journey.(ie Penrith to Brough) and access along length not on/off back lanes etc as this area is very unsafe in back roads due to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 August 2022

  • Startforth Parish Council (Startforth Parish Council)

    Startforth Parish Council objects to the proposals laid out for the Rokeby junction of the A66 dualling project. The reasons for the Parish Council's objections are as follows: 1. The proposed route... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 9 August 2022

  • Eden District Council (Eden District Council)

    Application by National Highways for an Order Granting Development Consent for the A66 Northern Trans-Pennine Project (“the Project”) (also referred to as the A66 Trans-Pennine Dualling Project)... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 10 August 2022

  • Hope and Scargill Parish Meeting (Hope and Scargill Parish Meeting)

    The proposed positioning of the Greta Bridge junction is too near to the Cross Lanes junction which will result in increased traffic for the Cross Lanes junction and a consequent increase of traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 11 August 2022

  • The Ramblers, Penrith Group (The Ramblers, Penrith Group)

    This representation is made on behalf of The Ramblers for the Cumbrian section of the scheme. We have no comments on the principle of the scheme, or on the route selected, but have looked at all the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • Musgrave Parish Council (Musgrave Parish Council)

    SERIOUS CONCERNS OF THE A66 ROUTE NEAR LANGRIGG, IT HAS CHANGED AGAIN SINCE WE TOLD WHAT THE ROUTE WOULD BE, IT HAS NOT BEEN A CONSULTATION, HIGHWAYS ENGLAND SEEM TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT AND TAKE NO... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 13 August 2022

  • Laura Blake

    The A66 Trans-Pennine project would increase carbon emissions by up to 4.4 million tonnes which is completely unacceptable, and not at all compliant with our country's legal commitment to Carbon Net... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2022

  • Anne Blake

    Cross Lanes to Rokeby I have concerns about the proposed 'black' route that is being put forward on the grounds of safety to the public. As a local resident I often walk along the Sills in Startforth... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 August 2022

  • Bryan Hall

    The continued use of the old A66 through Crackenthorpe to access the new junction is detrimental to the safety of all residents in the parish.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 August 2022

  • Crackenthorpe Parish Meeting (Crackenthorpe Parish Meeting)

    The Parish meeting is strongly opposed to changes made in February 2022, without consultation in Appleby, removing the westbound A66 access road from the largest settlement in the Eden Valley, Appleby... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 16 August 2022

  • Cumbria and Lakes Joint Local Access Forum (Cumbria and Lakes Joint Local Access Forum)

    The representation I will make on behalf of the Cumbria & Lakes Joint Local Access Forum will address matters relating to the alternative provisions to be made for pedestrians, horse riders and pedal... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 16 August 2022

  • Lesley Kelly

    The change of plan in February 2022 was inadequately consulted on or advertised locally. Is not in keeping with National Highways purpose regarding safety of local and transient road users. Disregards... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 August 2022

  • Howard Charlesworth

    I am concerned about the Rokeby Junction on the upgrading of the A66. No one I know agrees with the Highways England option of the "Black" route which moves the junction well to the West of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 August 2022

  • Celia Chapple

    The plan to route traffic through The Sills into Barnard Castle (from A66) is not the best route of the routes on offer. It is a road used by pedestrians as part of the town landscape and has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 August 2022

  • Daniel Thwaites PLC (Daniel Thwaites PLC)

    This representation should be read in conduction with the feedback already submitted to Highways England on 4th November 2021 as part of the initial consolation. Whilst we recognise the benefits the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 August 2022

  • Iain Waite

    The proposed route of the new dual carriageway will pass about 300 metres from our cottage. There will be parts in cut and parts on embankment in our vicinity so we are concerned about the impact of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 August 2022

  • Walton Goodland Ltd (Walton Goodland Ltd) on behalf of Dr. Antony Richard Leeming (Dr. Antony Richard Leeming )

    IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS A66 NORTHERN TRANS-PENNINE PROJECT DEVEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER APPLICATION AND IN THE MATTER OF LAND TO BE ACQUIRED PERMANENTLY AT [Redacted]... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2022

  • John Robinson

    We live on the route chosen by Highways England for access to Barnard Castle from a new junction on the A66. This route involves traffic travelling through Startforth on a very narrow road with only... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 August 2022

  • Alex Jakob-Whitworth

    I live locally and use the surrounding area between Penrith and Kirkby Stephen as part of my work. There will be a serious impact to our pace of life, to wildlife and habitats. There are issues with... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 August 2022

  • Jennifer White

    I believe that Highways England's decision to follow the Black route is significantly flawed and will cause substantial harm to the local area and community greatly outweighing harm that would be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 August 2022

  • Paula Carlington

    We live on the route chosen by Highways England for access to Barnard Castle from a new junction on the A66. This route involves traffic travelling through Startforth on a very narrow road with only... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 August 2022

  • Transport Action Network (Transport Action Network)

    Transport Action Network would like to register as an Interested Party for the A66 Examination. The proposed scheme would 1) increase traffic growth and carbon emissions by 2,190,452 tonnes over its... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 20 August 2022

  • Anthony Metcalfe

    At the initial stage 3 schemes were considered A66 A66 + A685 A69 The A685 (including Kirkby Stephen bypass option) was discarded on the basis of incorrect information 1) The scheme was priced at 88... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 August 2022

  • Barrie Cheetham

    I object to increasing traffic flow south of Penrith between Kemplay Roundabout on the A6 and junction M40 on the M6. An alternative route must be found for north to south and south to north traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 August 2022

  • Constance Blackett-Ord

    I would like to register as an interested party, as a local resident and outline my objections to the proposed A66 scheme. 1. Environmental- It has been calculated that the proposed scheme would... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 August 2022

  • Emma Tristram

    I object to this scheme because it would increase traffic growth and carbon emissions, when we need to achieve 68% reductions in UK carbon emissions by 2030 under our legally binding commitments under... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 August 2022

  • Robin Russell

    I have been representing West Layton residents in the Community Liaison Group meetings convened by the Highways Project Team. The consultation inputs from various residents in the village have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 August 2022

  • Barningham Parish Meeting (Barningham Parish Meeting)

    As the village of Barningham does not have a Parish Council the Parish Meeting is the represntative body for its residents. On 4 November 2021 I submitted an objection to National Highways on behalf... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Campaign for National Parks (Campaign for National Parks)

    We object to TRO10062 for the following reasons: The proposal fails to take account of the additional protections that apply in National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Center Parcs (Center Parcs)

    As an organisation Center Parcs fully support this project as it will benefit our staff of 1450 from a travel perspective, our guests of approximately 10,000 per week and it will most definitely save... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Cross Lanes to Rokeby Community Liaison Group (Cross Lanes to Rokeby Community Liaison Group)

    That the proposed junction and route at the East end of the Cross Lanes to Rokeby section of the upgrade, the 'Black Route' does not recognise the harms it will impose on Startforth and the lower... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Phillip Gate on behalf of East Layton Parish

    The majority of residents of East Layton do not want a junction on Moor Lane in the new A66 projewct. Moor Lane will attract an increased daily flow of vehicles which will all come through the village... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022

  • Bill Lloyd on behalf of Mr Billy Welch

    The proposed route of the development passes through the site of Brough Hill Fair. In 1330 the town of Brough was granted a charter for, inter alia, an annual four day fair which remains as Brough... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Transport for the North (Transport for the North)

    Transport for the North (TfN) is a Sub-national Transport Body (STB) with a statutory power to advise UK Government on the transport priorities for the North of England. Our advice reflects the views... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 23 August 2022