M60/M62/M66 Simister Island

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 58 of 58 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Anthony John Gildea

    I believe the scheme is to improve the flow of traffic through or on the M60 and M62. The bottleneck primarily is the stretch of Motorway between J18 and J12 westbound through what is known locally as... Read more

  • Frank John Taylor

    It's a disgrace to the environment

  • Jayne Lizbeth Harrison

    Catastrophic environmental impact on a small village od 300 homes

  • lee Richards

    Biodiversity impact....environmental impact (Noise and pollution)

  • Louise Holland

    I am no longer sure it is required due to the fact that monitoring has shown a dramatic change to simister island since 2016, as per a recent FOI I received. If there is no longer a traffic congestion... Read more

  • Darren Trousdale

    I live directly off Simister island so the disruption/building works will affect my families well being.

  • Margaret Stewardson

    One of the main impacts which will affect my day to day life is the use of Simister Lane and particularly Eygpt Lane to make an access point from the M66 to enable works for the loop. I & my young... Read more

  • Tracey Martin

    The environmental impact to the proposed M60 /66 motorway will be nothing short of disastrous. Has there been an impact report carried out on the area? Has there been any monitoring of pollutants? The... Read more

  • Emma Tristram

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. Rather than increasing capacity, National Highways should be seeking to reduce demand. The scheme will increase carbon emissions. The... Read more

  • John Goacher

    The scheme has changed to include the widening through whitefield. I am concerned about the increase in noise due to the scheme and looking for the scheme to include mitigation inc. sound dampening... Read more

  • Anna Patterson

    The main issues are the disturbance to everyday life. We live directly next to the motorway & general works already disturb us & our neighbours. So I can't imagine what it will be like once the works... Read more

  • Diane Maguire

    I agree with making the hard shoulder between junction 17 and 18 in a permanent lane but I feel as you’ve removed all the surrounding trees the noise level has increased and junction 17 now floods... Read more

  • Jonathan bethel

    The main issues I can see are the added noise and air pollution the drop in house prices to house owners like us that will take a hit and also with the ponds who is responsible for the management of... Read more

  • Leane Donoghue-Horrocks

    concerned about how close this will be to the houses at the bottom of parrenthorn

  • David Pedersen

    Instead of expanding the M60 Simister Island scheme, I would prefer if the British government invested in alternatives to road transportation instead, especially electric rail (for both passengers and... Read more

  • Jennifer Joyce Onslow on behalf of Residents of No. [REDACTED] (Residents of No. [REDACTED])

    During Construction and also once the work is complete Noise: - It will affect our sleep, the noise, lights and thudding noises are bad enough already when they're repairing the motorway. Once... Read more

  • Paul Bancroft

    I live quite close to the m60 motorway and have young children like most of the residents near me and are worried about the pollution and noise increase,the pollution is bad enough from all the... Read more

  • Lesley Philippa Bridgwater

    My stables are on the land adjacent to the proposed loop, the access to the site would severely hamper my ability to look after my horses and allow me 24 hour access to them due to the amount of... Read more

  • Lesley Philippa Bridgwater on behalf of Karen Vera Bridgwater

    I have my horses in the stables opposite the proposed loop and their welfare and overall health will be severely impacted by the work proposed and the length of time it will take to complete the work,... Read more

  • Bridget Holland

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. The scheme does not take into account in its modelling the fact that some 500Metres away from this site planning inspectors on Places... Read more

  • Friends of Carrington Moss (Friends of Carrington Moss)

    We object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. The Government/National Highways should be seeking alternative, more sustainable solutions to reduce demand (ie rail and water-based... Read more

  • Jane Wagner

    This is going to cause too much disruption to local people for far too long . The area is suffering from poor air quality and the government should be looking to improve this which will not happen if... Read more

  • john whitehead

    Unnecessary and would take green belt land

  • SALE CIVIC SOCIETY (SALE CIVIC SOCIETY)

    Sale Civic Society objection: We object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. The Government/National Highways should be seeking alternative, more sustainable solutions to reduce... Read more

  • Steady State Manchester (Steady State Manchester)

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. The scheme concerns one of the busiest motorway junctions in the north-west, and is already within Noise Important Areas (NIA) and Air... Read more

  • Mrs Judith Sheppard

    I strongly object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. It is one of the busiest motorway junctions in the north-west, and is already within Noise Important Areas (NIA) and Air... Read more

  • Susan Sollazzi

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. It is an unsustainable solution to traffic congestion. National Highways should be seeking solutions to alleviate the problems currently... Read more

  • Mair Bain

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. Rather than increasing capacity, National Highways should be seeking to reduce demand. Instead of dealing with the severe air and noise... Read more

  • Historic England (Historic England)

    Historic England (formally “The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England”) is the Government’s adviser on all aspects of the historic environment in England - including historic... Read more

  • WBW Surveyors Ltd (WBW Surveyors Ltd) on behalf of The Massey Family (The Massey Family)

    The scheme proposals involve purchasing some of our land for an attenuation pond. The land in question has been allocated for residential development within the approved Places for Everyone... Read more

  • Pamela Thomas

    I would like to see what screening will be provided to reduce both visual and noise impact of loop being created at Simister Island. I use these MWays on a daily basis and fail to understand how this... Read more

  • Mark Thomas

    I have received all the paperwork regarding this particular project as I have registered an interest because the project affects my local area and home. I’m finding it difficult to understand how/why... Read more

  • Martyn John WEST

    I have made submissions to the HA project manager for provision of lighting in the Hawswater underpass and provided information regarding usage of the underpass as it needs significant work to make it... Read more

  • Climate Emergency Planning and Policy (Climate Emergency Planning and Policy)

    Dr Andrew Boswell, Climate Emergency Planning and Policy Independent environmental consultant specialising in climate science, policy, and law. The environmental statement for the scheme, including... Read more

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    Please see attached letter.

  • Cadent Gas (Cadent Gas)

    Representation by Cadent Gas Limited (Cadent) to the M60/M62/M66 Simister Island Development Consent Orders (DCO) Cadent is a licensed gas transporter under the Gas Act 1986, with a statutory... Read more

  • Lorraine Eagling

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. It is one of the busiest motorway junctions in the north-west, and is already within Noise Important Areas (NIA) and Air Quality... Read more

  • Robert Palgrave

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. Carbon emissions would be increased by 62,013 tonnes during construction, and 151,090 tonnes over 60 years due to the increased traffic.... Read more

  • Lisa Ridley

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. It is one of the busiest motorway junctions in the north-west, and is already within Noise Important Areas (NIA) and Air Quality... Read more

  • Renate Aspden

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. It is one of the busiest motorway junctions in the north-west, and is already within Noise Important Areas (NIA) and Air Quality... Read more

  • Diane Plunkett

    This development will have huge negatives impact on the area, affecting flora and fauna which is already compromised. If the proposed development takes place, the effect will be permanent and will... Read more

  • Julie Hay

    I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. Given Greater Manchester's adopted spatial plan will release more than 2,400 hectares of Green Belt for development any additional loss... Read more

  • Paula Jane Hickey

    Poor air quality and local respiratory disease rates Loss of biodiversity and habitats Increased noise level Increased level of Particulates contributing to local ill health

  • Save Greater Manchester's Green Belt (Save Greater Manchester's Green Belt)

    We object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. Both St Margaret's C of E Primary School ( 200m from the M62) and Parrenthorn High School (300m away from M62 & M60) are too close and... Read more

  • Anne Robinson

    When I put in my response it destroyed the format of two tables making them difficult to read. I have therefore sent my registration comments via email to PINS.

  • David Frankal

    I am writing as an individual (long-time and soon returning resident of Greater Manchester). I oppose this project as I believe it is fundamentally irresponsible to plough such sums of money into yet... Read more

  • Ian Hillary

    The use of land in the proposal is not space efficient and will increase the cost of the scheme, not representing the best value for public money. Attenuation Pond 1 could be located closer to the... Read more

  • Peter Thompson

    1. I object to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. 2. National Highways have only ever proposed or examined variations of a roadbuilding scheme, NEVER any non-road building... Read more

  • Bury Council (Bury Council)

    This communication is in response to the invitation to ‘Register to have your say about a national infrastructure project’. Bury Council as the host authority to the project has been involved in the... Read more

  • Roger Hannah Limited (Roger Hannah Limited) on behalf of Joseph Holt Limited (Joseph Holt Limited)

    M60/M62/M66 Simister Island Interchange, Development Consent Order, 2024. Owner: Joseph Holt Ltd Property: Frigate Public House, Thatch Leach Lane, Manchester M45 6FW Plot Numbers: 1/33a & 1/33b We... Read more

  • Squire Patton Boggs UK LLP (Squire Patton Boggs UK LLP) on behalf of The Trustees of Pike Fold Golf Club (The Trustees of Pike Fold Golf Club)

    1.We act for the Trustees of Pike Fold Golf Club (“PFGC”) and have been instructed to submit relevant representations on their behalf. The Trustees of PFGC are the freehold owners and operators of... Read more

  • United Utilities Water Limited (United Utilities Water Limited)

    United Utilities Water Limited (United Utilities) wishes to register as an interested party in the application for a Development Consent Order for the M60/M62/M66 Simister Island Interchange... Read more

  • CHELSEA BUTTERWORTH JOYCE

    Main Issues & Impacts I have had difficulty getting in touch - tried to call the number stated on the letter to discuss, however the person I spoke to had no knowledge on the scheme and couldn’t help... Read more

  • Christopher Gillham

    The necessary transport decarbonisation trajectory cannot be achieved without significant traffic reduction. This scheme increases capacity and leads to induced traffic. The recent High Court judgment... Read more

  • Environment Agency (Environment Agency)

    The Planning Inspectorate Our Ref: SO/2023/123759/04 Your Ref: TR010064 Date 5 July 2024 Dear Sir/Madam APPLICATION FOR PRE-EXAMINATION - M60/M62/M66 SIMISTER ISLAND RELEVANT REPRESENTATION –... Read more

  • National Grid Electricity Transmission plc (National Grid Electricity Transmission plc)

    Relevant Representation of NGET (National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc) in respect of the M60/M62/M66 Simister Island DCO (the “Project”) This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of... Read more

  • Transport Action Network (Transport Action Network)

    Transport Action Network (TAN) objects to the proposed scheme at Simister Island Interchange. It is one of the busiest motorway junctions in the north-west, and is already within Noise Important Areas... Read more

  • Ward Hadaway LLP (Ward Hadaway LLP) on behalf of Ward Hadaway LLP on behalf of the Hillary Family

    Application by National Highways Limited for the M60/M62/M66 Simister Island Interchange Development Consent Order 202[ ]. Section 56 of the Planning Act 2008: Relevant Representation of John Hillary... Read more