Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I do not want a second runway at Gatwick. We have enough housing, roads and employment. We have no space for new housing unless we start eating up into the green belt and that should be safe guarded...
Read more
-
As an employer at Gatwick albeit a small business we are not for this project. The chaos this would cause would impact on the already creaking operation. Businesses can not as it is recruit and retain...
Read more
-
I’m against the proposed development: Negative impact of noise of new runway and increased noise pollution from additional flights Increase in greenhouse gases from additional flights Negative impact-...
Read more
-
The dynamics of the UK economy keeps changing and every now and again the infrastructure need to be changed accordingly.The UK is a major player in regional and international economy, so if the...
Read more
-
This massive airport expansion will come at a huge carbon cost, from its construction, from the increase in flights and from increased travel to access the airport. Currently there are no low carbon...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed expansion of Gatwick airport will have an unfair detrimental impact of residents in Kent and East Sussex from increased, and more intense aircraft noise.
-
It allows improvements to our airfield, terminal facilities and access arrangements into the airport.
-
Extra noise, pollution, traffic, road congestion, demand for housing for airport workers of all grades will occur. How will the local infrastructure cope, and who will pay the extra costs? Some...
Read more
-
No airport should be expanded whilst aircraft are reliant on fossil fuels - the climate emergency demands this. An expansion of Gatwick will increase noise pollution over East Grinstead and exacerbate...
Read more
-
I support the use of the runway in line with existing restrictions that apply to the main runway.
-
Will bring more jobs to crawley
-
I don’t think increasing pollution is the right way to deal with the climate emergency. This is absolutely not where our priorities should be.
-
Additional airport capacity would be incompatible with net zero targets and would help increase carbon dioxide emissions.
-
If the airport is to grow. It needs to start using this existing second runway at the very least on a temporary basis to check out any safety implications.
-
This is a brilliant idea to convert the northern runway, Gatwick Airport is the main say for a lot of the local residents and having this application submitted and approved will only help with more...
Read more
-
I travel frequently and live in the area more routes and job security for the local community is essential
-
I would like to support the construction of a second runway at Gatwick Airport. I believe it is extremely important that the airtraffic is eased up by increasing the landing and takeoff capacity of...
Read more
-
Pollution, Noise, Greenhouse Gases, Infrastructure Demand, Traffic Congestion, Plastics. No thanks.
-
Don't believe this is a good option, it'll increase the number of flights, which in turn will increase pressure on local infrastructure and have a detrimental affect on wildlife. It'll also have a...
Read more
-
I can not put it better than the paragraphs I have copied and pasted below regarding my objections to Gatwick Airport runway plans. It’s the same ‘profit at all costs’ approach this country suffers...
Read more
-
The benefits of allowing London Gatwick Airport to expand using their existing infrastructure options are as follows: 1. Access to the airport is excellent via train, road and bus. No upgrades are...
Read more
-
I approve. Increasing Gatwick is essential.
-
Brillant
-
I live in this area and love this area. I feel that anymore air and noise pollution which will be caused by the use of this runway could lead to a drastic decrease in my lifestyle and could...
Read more
-
Gatwick needs more capacity to reduce aircraft holding to reduce carbon