Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 451 to 475 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Simon Elkins Green

    The area needs to keep developing and growing , we have all been hit massively with Covid the down turn in growth and financial status , it’s the time old quote IF WE STAND STILL WE GO BACKWARDS Let’s... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Simon Markfort

    I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Simon Marshall

    An extra runway will bring more business and job to the area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Simon Monhemius

    I would like to strongly object to planned expansion of Gatwick airport. We are already plagued by noise, that will only increase. We should not be expanding airports and certainly not in unsuitable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Simon Robert Mills

    I don’t think the runway should be use there is enough noise pollution already this would just increase it .this also would add traffic to the area more Taxie’s who park on yellow lines in povey... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Somaditya Bandyopadhyay

    I believe growth of Gatwick Airport is in the best interest of the local economy.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Sophie Gordon

    I am commenting as an individual, as a resident of Surrey. I fully support and endorse the comments made by Surrey Climate Commission and Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign (GACC), as outlined below.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Spencer Christian

    CO2 emissions need to be cut immediately. Expansion is counter to all scientific advice on reaching net zero. Millions are already suffering the devastating effects of climate change. Their lives are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Ste Reece

    I support this application. I lived in Crawley since 1956 to 1999. The Airport is a very important part of Crawley, and surrounding area, for it's economy, infrastructure, and the people of the area... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stefan Tamba

    I am a taxi driver and this project will bring more work for this industry and will be beneficial for me and my family

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stefania Garau

    I support this as Crawley needs significant investment

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stephanie Cracknell

    The main issue is pollution and climate change caused by air traffic

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stephen Bellamy

    I object to the project on the following grounds because I believe it to be a new runway: 1. I am greatly concerned that the increased level of air traffic will have a detrimental impact on the level... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stephen Cowles

    While we face a climate emergency, any expansion in air travel cannot be considered necessary.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stephen Hugh McKenna

    This submission has been prepared based in part on the response of others including Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign (GACC) and New Economics Foundation and in part on my own professional expertise... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stephen James White

    The proposed project will create additional aircraft noise in the surrounding area. Expansion of the airport will also put pressure on transport facilities in the area. It will also have an adverse... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stephen King

    Nothing has changed since Gatwick was turned down in favour of Heathrow expansion by the Airport Commission in 2015. Gatwick sits on a single arterial road (M23) and a single railway line that can’t... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stephen Thompson

    I object most strenuously against the expansion of Gatwick, including the construction of a second runway. The most significant issues are the increasing local and global pollution, especially... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stephen Woodcock

    My principal objection is on the grounds of carbon emissions. I do not believe the economic argument is well-supported for expansion, but I also think the economic aspects are marginal relative to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Steve Miles

    Living below the flight path means that the noise intrusion will increase above what I would consider to be already high levels - but surely cutting down on the fossil fuel usage alone should push the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Steve Mitchell

    Gatwick Airport needs to expand. The lack of infrastructure invested in airports since the war is a disgrace

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Steven James

    I am opposed to the second runway at Gatwick due to the increased noise pollution and other major environmental factors.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Steven Manser

    The approval of this plan is a no-brainier - if we want our country to be competitive we need to have good links with the rest of the world - expansion of Gatwick’s capacity is essential to ensure... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Steven Powney

    Decline the expansion request - it is not warranted and the current flight activity is already a nuisance

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023

  • Stuart Bailey

    The main issues are increased noise and environmental damage to local residents. A lack of demand in shoulder periods of the day means Gatwick is not full, they only want to be able to sell expensive... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 November 2023