Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 226 to 250 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • John Andrew McMunn

    The relocation of Anglian Water's sewage works to Honey Hill would be a travesty. It would be a major building project on green belt land in contradiction of national and local planning policy. It... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • John Rymell

    I am opposed to moving the sewage treatment works to a new site at Honey Hill. This will mean building on the Green belt, which is contrary to national and local planning policy. Since its creation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Jonathan Ben Quash

    This proposal does not meet the essential criterion of being *necessary*. The existing sewage works are fit for purpose and could be operative for several decades to come. This plan proposes to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Jonathan Buchanan

    1 – traffic: the number of HGVs especially and construction traffic between Horningsea and Fen Ditton and the A14 road bridge. Mr Buchanan is reliant on a bicycle for transport and feels it will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Julian Wolstan Francis (Julian Wolstan Francis) on behalf of Julian Wolstan Francis (Julian Wolstan Francis)

    Carter Jonas on behalf of the principal landowner of the site continue to be in negotiations with Anglian Water. These representations are submitted on behalf of Mr Julian Francis and are in addition... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Katherine Restif

    As a resident of Horningsea, I object to Anglian Water’s DCO application to relocate the sewage works to Honey Hill on the following grounds: • Substantial investment has already been made to upgrade... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Laura Mary Taylor

    There is no need to move the current water treatment plant. It will be a costly exercise for little to no gain. I will be personally hugely inconvenienced by the increase in traffic to Horningsea Road... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Madelaine Clark

    Anglia Water have no clear need to move or upgrade the sewage works. This is a project purely driven by a desire to develop and profit from the land it currently sits on. Building on green belt land... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Major Thomas Michael Daniel

    I wish to protest very strongly against the proposed removal of the sewage works from its present site to Honey Hill, Fen Ditton. As a Fellow of the Chartered Institute in Environmental Health I have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Marc Ridyard

    I object to the Anglian Water (AW) application for a Development Consent Order to relocate the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to the area between Horningsea, Fen Ditton and Stow Cum Quy, known... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Marie Saumarez

    Loss of agricultural land Impact of increased traffic Water table and aquifers

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Matthew Alan Stancombe

    I am extremely concerned about a possible threat to a Principle Chalk Aquifer which according to DEFRA is at high risk of groundwater contamination. Honey Hill should have been discounted as an option... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Meyland Family (Meyland Family) on behalf of Meyland Family (Meyland Family)

    We live in Fen Ditton which will be directly affected by the Sewage Project. This is on green belt, some of which is used for arable farming and some privately owned meadows which have been cultivated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP (Addleshaw Goddard LLP) on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)

    APPLICATION BY ANGLIAN WATER SERVICES LIMITED FOR THE CAMBRIDGE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT RELOCATION PROJECT ORDER 202[X] PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE: WW010003 SECTION 56 PLANNING ACT 2008:... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Nick Moir

    I write as the incumbent (rector/vicar) of Fen Ditton, Horningsea and Teversham, as a resident of the new Marleigh development, a parish councillor in Fen Ditton, and as a long-time resident in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • P. X. Farms Ltd (P. X. Farms Ltd)

    P.X.Farms objects to the proposed location of the new waste water treatment plant. The works associated with the construction and ongoing operation of the site will impact PXF’s farming activity which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Philip John Goodwin

    Dear Planning Inspectorate, Project: Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Applicant: Anglian Water Services Limited Relevant Representation of Ms Elizabeth Cotton [Redacted] [Redacted]. The Property... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Richard Consoli

    Impact on the Conservation areas of Fen Ditton and Horningsea. Building on Green Belt is contrary to national and local planning policy. It is there to protect the setting of our historic city and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Rowena Small

    The water treatment works were up-graded and 'future-proofed' relatively recently, so there is no pressing need to move them. This scheme is a waste of public money and will severely damage the green... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Sarah Ann Smart

    Objection to use of green belt

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Sharon Byrne

    I strongly objec to this proposal for a number of important reasons. It is proposed to build on green belt and this is contrary to both national and loca planning policy. There is also a high risk of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Stow-cum-Quy Parish Council (Stow-cum-Quy Parish Council)

    I am providing comments on behalf of the Parish Council of Stow-cum Quy. First and foremost, we do not believe the current planning application sufficiently justifies relocating the water treatment... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Suffolk County Council (Suffolk County Council)

    Thank you for notifying Suffolk County Council that the above application has been accepted by the Planning Inspectorate for examination. I am responding on behalf of Suffolk County Council to your... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • The Woodland Trust (The Woodland Trust)

    Thank you for the opportunity to register as an interested party on the following project. We hold concerns regarding two veteran trees which are likely to be affected by the proposed Waterbeach... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Thomas Ward

    I used to live in fenditton and I work in the area. It is a beautiful wild area and the loss of biodiversity and wildlife would be a very sad and long lasting disaster for the local area. The building... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023