Navitus Bay Wind Park

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 26 to 50 of 187 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to W D Frewing

    How can I make a personal submission to the Navitus Bay enquiry?

  • View advice to John Searle

    Query regarding how and when to submit a document into the examination that is not intended to be a new representation, but is additional information to assist the ExA.

  • View advice to Graeme Crouch

    I would like to ask a few questions about the Navitus Bay Examination. 1) When making submissions for the 5th November deadline is it acceptable to mix the category of submission within one document... Read more

  • View advice to Challenge Navitus

    There has been an exceptional response to Deadline II, not least from the applicant, including new information that we would have expected to have been available pre-application when there was more... Read more

  • View advice to PCBA

    On behalf of PCBA I am writing to note the substantial volume of material that you have received by way of Written Reps. Our early review suggests this is an unprecedented volume with substantial... Read more

  • View advice to Gerald Austin

    When the Jurassic Coast was given World Heritage status, by UNESCO the UK govt was charged with ensuring its status in perpetuity against massive industrial development. The proposed Wind Farm in... Read more

  • View advice to John Searle

    Could you clarify 3 points for me: a) I am already registered as an Interested Party. Does this allow me to attend the hearing scheduled for 22 January 2015 on Compulsory Acquisition ? b) ... Read more

  • View advice to Bournemouth Borough Council

    Query regarding the Issue Specific Hearings and how people can request to attend or speak. Ms Corrie also queried how people would know that they needed to submit a Written Representation or make a... Read more

  • View advice to P Dewhurst

    Query relating to a newspaper article.

  • View advice to Clarissa Kindred

    Query regarding how to become an Interested Party.

  • View advice to Bill Hoodless

    We have received from the Applicant a draft SOCG that is under consideration. Since there is the question of compulsory powers to consider, am I right in thinking this would be a suitable matter to... Read more

  • View advice to Alan Rayner

    Query relating to the use of Section 106 Agreements.

  • View advice to Peter Fenning

    I have noted in your letter of 31st July that the Panel has decided to accept the submission of the technical annexes and has set a deadline of 6th October Would you please advise if within these... Read more

  • View advice to Roy Pointer

    PCBA has reviewed its approach to the Examination in light of your procedure letter dated 31 July. In that letter you request submissions before 1 September and I am sending you this note to cover... Read more

  • View advice to Challenge Navitus

    As we mentioned at our previous meeting, we will have video evidence to submit to the ExA during the Navitus Bay examination. This will require some fairly standard hardware, but it must be "High... Read more

  • View advice to Donia Gray

    Has information about this project been put on Face Book which would inform young 18 to 30 year old adults

  • View advice to New Forest District council

    In accordance with the requirements of the relevant legislation NFDC have worked hard with NBDL and others, notably the other landside LPA?s, to maximise common ground and deliver a mechanism that... Read more

  • View advice to New Forest District Council

    Request for submission of the LIR on 10 October rather than the deadline of 6 October as stated in the Rule 6 letter, this is due to timings around committee meetings and availability of key members.

  • View advice to Richard Malton

    Please see attached TO correspondence

  • View advice to PCBA

    I am now writing as arranged with some queries and requests in order that we can contribute to smooth running of the Examination ? 1. One of the headings in Annex H of the Rule 6 letter for SOCG... Read more

  • View advice to David Law

    Query enquiring when further comments will be requested to be submitted

  • View advice to Challenge Navitus

    In preparation for written representations on the Navitus Bay wind farm, please would you tell me on what media you will accept large data files. It is impractical to email large files, so we may... Read more

  • View advice to Poole & Christchurch Bay Assoc

    Query relating to the submission of Written Representations, and to how they will know what sort of information to bring to any hearings.

  • View advice to Bournemouth Airport

    If the CAA are a statutory consultee does ODPM 01/2003 not apply which would result in Bournemouth Airport being a statutory consultee as that circular took the responsibility for safeguarding from... Read more

  • View advice to Alan Gray

    Query relating to whether The Planning Inspectorate can legally request that a Local Authority gets involved in the examination.