Filter
East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 501 to 525 of 878 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Rachel Minto

    I have major concern with windfarm project EA1N. My concerns are: 1. The damage which will be caused to Thorpeness cliffs which are fragile and unsuitable for landing cables 2. The threat to wildlife... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Richard Hunter

    I support the representation being made by SASES and the Friston parish council. We are subject to flooding in Low Rd already before the Sub stations are built. Loss of landscape & foot paths. Loss of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • S Sherwell

    It is not acceptable to desecrate large areas of rural Suffolk in this way. There are better places to do the onshore construction that will have less impact on our beautiful countryside.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Sally Sibley

    I wish the following points to be considered by any planning body in respect of EA1N proposals: -marine damage and economic impact on fishermen. - damage to water courses for endangered wildlife and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Sara Keene

    While I support offshore wind energy, I cannot support these plans for the onshore constructions that will destroy one of the most beautiful parts of our coastline and with it, for sure, a large part... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • SASES Substation Action Save East Suffolk (SASES Substation Action Save East Suffolk)

    These are the relevant representations of SASES (sases.org.uk) and Friston Parish Council. 1. INTRODUCTION The proposed developments (EA1N and EA2) will have a significant adverse impact on Friston... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Scott Munt

    - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects - Unsuitability of Thorpeness Cliffs as site for landing cables - Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for substation complexes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Scott Tindle

    I am writing to you with regards Scottish Power Renewables (SPR) planning application EA1N- PINS DCO application with regards the Friston Substation and register as an interested party. I wish to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Sizewell Residents’ Association (Sizewell Residents’ Association)

    Sizewell residents are gravely concerned about these plans because 1). They involve drilling on an already fragile and eroding coastline. The corraline crag has been shown to be a hugely stabilising... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Suffolk Local Access Forum (Suffolk Local Access Forum)

    The Suffolk Local Access Forum is a statutory body set up under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 to advise the County Council and other bodies with regard to public access to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Susan Seabrook

    1) [Redacted] was purchased by myself in October 2017. At that time there was no planning application by Scottish Power Renewables that could be discovered in the Searches relevant to my new property.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Teresa Newton Newton

    I do feel that if this construction has to go ahead in Suffolk that it would be lost at Sizewell and not so noticeable as it would be at Friston where it will stick out like a sore thumb on virgin... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • The Woodland Trust (The Woodland Trust)

    The Woodland Trust welcomes the opportunity to register a representation to the following project. For the purposes of clarity, our concerns described below are with respect to both applications (East... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Thelma Cramb

    I have been a regular visitor to Friston for over 20 years spending long holidays with my daughter and son in law and their family in their home in the countryside outside the village. I do not object... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Tim Rowan-Robinson

    RE: EAST ANGLIA ONE NORTH Whilst being supportive on the development of offshore wind farms, I strongly object to this application from Scottish Power Renewables for the following reasons: 1. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Valerie Simper

    The beautiful East Coast so important to the tourist industry and the many jobs that it provides could be seriously challenged by hotchpotch planning for cheaper green energy. A considered 10/20 year... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Victor Smart

    This project is ill advised and will blight local communities. High House Farm, a listed building, will be especially harmed. So will the wildlife. The site itself is unnecessary as a ring main could... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Victoria Bennett-Hall

    I wish to object to the ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: Impact on tourism Impact on local economy, loss of trade leading to social and economic decline Threat... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • William Rickett, C.B.

    I wish to object to those parts of the application that relate to onshore infrastructure. This infrastructure will have a serious impact on the economy and environment of the area, by damaging... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 January 2020

  • Alexander Green

    We do not object to offshore wind farms. We object to the onshoring of such capacity which causes despoliation to the countryside. SPR will construct one of the largest substations in Europe in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Annabel Gault

    Dear Sir/Madam, Scottish Power's planned substation at Friston is an act of vandalism on our precious countryside. It will destroy the lives of most people living in this area particularily the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Antonia Curtis

    I am a regular visitor to the Suffolk Heritage coast staying with friends who live near Friston. I do not object to offshore wind farms what I object to is the onshore installations which will cause... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Barbara Jeffries

    I fear that if this is allowed to go ahead there will be an onslaught of at least six more substations and interconnectors following on in quick succession. There will be cumulative impact on local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Carol Bizzell

    I support the representations being made by SASES and Friston Parish Council opposing the siting of the substations at Friston and set out below my comments: • The village has a history of flooding... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Catherine Judith Pinnekamp

    CUMULATIVE IMPACT • Sizewell C - DCO Application 2020? • National Grid Ventures Interconnectors • Nautilus - Public Consultations in 2020 • Eurolink - Plans to follow • Expansion of offshore windfarms... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020