Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Renewable energy is the future, we cannot continue to rely on fossil fuels
-
I have major concerns about the stability of the caravan standing due to major earth works; pollution from dust, noise and traffic as well as a detrimental effect on natural habitats which have been...
Read more
-
There was a failure to consult correctly. There are significant environmental issues if this goes ahead in the planned area. Substation at Wineham Lane would be a more suitable site. A272 access would...
Read more
-
I fully support the expansion of the wind farm. The UK needs more green energy.
-
I oppose the Rampion 2 project for the following reasons:- 1. It will have an adverse effect on our local environment because the turbines would 2.5 times the height of Rampion 1 and very visible from...
Read more
-
31 October 2023 Our Ref: DNB785/HC The Planning Inspectorate National Infrastructure Directorate Temple Quay House Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6PN Dear Sirs, [REDACTED] Rampion 2 response to section 56...
Read more
-
1. We act for Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) and have been instructed to submit relevant representations on its behalf. As a statutory undertaker affected by the proposed DCO we...
Read more
-
The short term and long term effects to local marine life will never fully recover from the installation. The equipment, such as the blades are not recyclable, so the benefits re energy production do...
Read more
-
More detail required exactly where the proposed cabling will come ashore. Elmer and Climping are both missing from the map. The noise from piling will be intolerable for Elmer residents. Sea bed...
Read more
-
Dear Sir / Madam, As long-term residents, we are writing to express our extreme concern and absolute opposition to the use of Dragons Lane for this project. The lane is simply not suitable for heavy...
Read more
-
Potential impact on constituents.
-
I object to the increased height of the new turbines, and the fact that it will fence in the south coast causing a barrier to the migratory routes of our at risk bird population not to mention the...
Read more
-
We are very concerned about the impact the Rampion 2 proposal will have on the area around where we live. Aside from Rampion 2 being very much an Onshore development (despite being touted as an...
Read more
-
I approve of green energy initiatives. Although the sea bed will be damaged by building the turbines, once they are built the sea bed should be left alone to colonise with sea grasses and weeds. I...
Read more
-
TC Rampion OFTO Limited owns and operates the offshore transmission system associated with the Rampion offshore windfarm. This includes the offshore substation, on and offshore cables, the Twineham...
Read more
-
This response represents the views of members of Worthing BSAC dive club #1323, also members of Guildford BSAC who regularly dive this area. This is our contribution of feedback to the proposals...
Read more
-
I approve
-
This dreadful proposal is characterised by having minimum benefits and maximum drawbacks despite huge costs:- -We are being asked to accept what is being described as only an ”extension” to the...
Read more
-
the timescale and potential noise, dust and unknown people
-
Tourism is absolutely vital to the West Sussex coastal community and hence to the wellbeing of all residents. Given the catastrophic scale of fires which broke out in Southern Europe and elsewhere...
Read more
-
I live very close to the sea here, in Littlehampton. I try and swim in the sea daily unless the tides are too choppy and always avoid looking east, where Rampion 1 scars the skyline. The very idea of...
Read more
-
I object to the proposals for Rampion II. I believe Oakendene was chosen as during the initial stages there were very few objections from the Cowfold area as local people were unaware of the size and...
Read more
-
The planet is dying, and if we don’t do this as part of the bigger picture of using green energy so will we. Even if you do not agree with climate change isn’t it better to have it than not. I see the...
Read more
-
The money involved should be used for research into using LESS electricity, and nobody knows what the impact on the local environment will be, whether on land or in the sea.
-
Don’t do it. More wind and less disruptions to the seaside towns between the IOW and Selsey