Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Bramford to Twinstead

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 75 of 138 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Michael Donald Evans

    I strongly object that the Development Consent Order if agreed to can authorise compulsory acquisition of my home and land. I strongly object to the removal of my independent thoughts of controlling... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • William Alexander Bryce

    There has been no suitable consultation of this project. The landowners affected have not been engaged with directly to any proper degree. Undergrounding has not been considered enough where there is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023

  • Ann Roberts

    I fully support all the comments made by the group Stour Valley Underground. My main concerns are that there has not been proper consideration to the option to take power lines round the coast. This... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2023

  • Frank Thorogood

    • Lack of suitable consultation since the revival of the project. • Lack of proper engagement with the landowners • No proper consideration of undergrounding in areas where there will be a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2023

  • Malcolm Frost

    Regarding plan ID: NG-BTNO-OPT-69-PLAN-1 You have highlighted an area on my property and submitted a lease offer. I refuse this offer on the following grounds. This area is my only access point to my... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2023

  • Mead Farms (Mead Farms)

    You have highlighted a section of road/ margin next to my land (Plan 9525). This strip contains a hedge bordering my land which i maintain. I do not give my consent for you to carry out any works on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2023

  • Patricia Prosser

    We oppose more pylons through the Suffolk countryside. In particular, a new longer pylon route is planned north of Ramsey Wood in Hintlesham, thereby encompassing the woods on three sides. This route... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 July 2023

  • James Harris

    There has been a lack of consultation since the revival of this project, and a lack of proper engagement with landowners, of which I am one. The proposed line is going to emerge from the ground in one... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 July 2023

  • Joanne Lesley Elliott

    This project is close to where I live in an area I drive through regularly. I am concerned about the long term impact of multiple infrastructure projects on our countryside and our ability to go about... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 July 2023

  • John Duncan Irvine Bennett

    The consultation has been fundamentally flawed. The engagement with landowners has been piecemeal. NG took advantage of Covid, using it as an excuse. Questions on Teams Calls were not read out and NG... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 July 2023

  • Little Maplestead Parish Council (Little Maplestead Parish Council)

    To: The National Grid By email: contact@bramford-twinstead.nationalgrid.com RE: BRAMFORD TO TWINSTEAD REINFORCEMENT Dear Sir, I would like to introduce myself: I am the Chairman of the Little... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 14 July 2023

  • Stour Valley Underground (Stour Valley Underground)

    Stour Valley Underground (SVU) is a local community group established on the Essex side of the Stour Valley in 2009 focussing on protecting and enhancing the rural landscape from industrialisation.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 July 2023

  • Daws Hall Trust (Daws Hall Trust)

    Daws Hall Trust (DHT) is a registered charity with a 25 acre nature reserve adjacent to Henny Road, Lamarsh CO8 5EX, next to the proposed undergrounding in the Stour Valley Section G. DHT supports the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 July 2023

  • Fiske Farms and Fiske Lands Trust (Fiske Farms and Fiske Lands Trust)

    1.Lack of suitable consultation since the revival of the project particularly the provision of inadequate maps 2.Lack of proper engagement with landowners and lack of recognition of their detailed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 July 2023

  • Edward Roy Richardson

    Concern about lack of proper consultation with members of public Lack of proper consultation with landowners

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 July 2023

  • Essex Police (Essex Police)

    The representations of Essex Police seek to secure appropriate mitigation and management measures, either via requirements of the DCO or Statement of Common Ground, to address the likely impacts... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Jonathan Prosser

    There has been no proper consideration of undergrounding through Hintlesham and diverts large distances around the fields surrounding Ramsy Wood. The wood itself has already been cut in half by an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 July 2023

  • Vicki Georgina Longdon

    The noise, dust, additional traffic and general disruption to the beautiful countryside and wildlife next to the property I own and for such a long unnecessary duration.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 July 2023

  • Assington Parish Council (Assington Parish Council)

    We believe that the proposed scheme could and should do more to mitigate its impact on local communities, the environment, and tourism in the area. As a group representing local residents, we are also... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 11 July 2023

  • Braintree District Council (Braintree District Council)

    Essex County Council (ECC) and Braintree District Council (BDC) have been engaged alongside the adjoining Authorities who share the route of this development proposal, hence are automatically... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 11 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Mr Nicholas Reid

    Whilst there has been consultation, it hasn't led to any material mitigation of the impact of the project. Engagement with the landowners has been sporadic and disjointed; changes of staff/contact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 July 2023

  • Mrs Nicola Tindall

    To ask whether the proposed access route immediately opposite my home, for service vehicles, for the compound sealant unit, can be moved 50 meters to the right (looking across the road from my home).... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 July 2023

  • Veronica Ann Overall

    1. There appears to be a lack of suitable consultation since the revival of the project. 2. There seems to be a lack of proper engagement with the landowners. 3. Where is the proper consideration of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 July 2023

  • WILLIAM BRIAN SIDNEY BRYCE

    Sent many suggestions and reasons why I am not happy to N GRID but to this day never received a single reply or visit about my worries. I am well aware that your company knew where the new line was... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 July 2023

  • James Ian Thomas Bryce

    As a land owner that is effected by the pylon line I feel individual consultation has been very poor

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023