Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Bramford to Twinstead

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 50 of 138 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • *WITHDRAWN* CARE Suffolk CIC (*WITHDRAWN* CARE Suffolk CIC)

    Dear Sir/ Madam, Ref: Bramford to Twinstead – Registration Submission for CARE Suffolk CIC I am writing to you on behalf of CARE Suffolk CIC. We are a community group of residents in parishes around... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Alan Hall

    As an affected landowner, I object to the proposed design of a new bellmouth entrance for the existing farm track adjacent to my property at Rose Cottage, Burstall, IP8 3DX. My grounds for objection... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Andrew Bryce

    Lack of suitable consultation since the revival of the project. Lack of proper engagement with the landowners No proper consideration of undergrounding in areas where there will be a concentration of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Anglian Water Services Ltd (Anglian Water Services Ltd)

    Anglian Water is the statutory water and sewerage undertaker within the project's order limits. Anglian Water has engaged with National Grid (the Applicant) to discuss the interfaces between the... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils (Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils)

    Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils are host authorities and relevant planning authorities for this project. The Councils will set out our comments on the main issues and impact in relevant... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Belinda Nott

    Representation in respect of the Bramford to Twinstead Reinforcement Project Submitted by Belinda Nott Dear Inspector, I am the daughter of Mr. G V S Nott whose farm National Grid (NG) are proposing a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Bramford Parish Council (Bramford Parish Council)

    Bramford Parish Council have concerns regarding cumulative impact of his expansion, accompanied with other projects in the area. The impact on wildlife and the rural landscape will be significant.... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Bruce Hill

    I wish to comment on the haul road approximately from Catley Cross to Pebmarsh and the unsustainability of the route.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Bures Hamlet Parish Council (Bures Hamlet Parish Council)

    As a crossborder village Bures is represented by two parish councils Bures Hamlet and Bures St Mary. Bures Hamlet Parish Council has agreed to support the comments of Bures St Mary Parish Council... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • C E Gardiner and Sons (C E Gardiner and Sons)

    As a contractor of land we expect fair compensation will be paid as a result of this scheme but, from a practical point of view, we ask the Inspector to look at the other options National Grid have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Cadent Gas Limited (Cadent Gas Limited)

    Representation by Cadent Gas Limited (Cadent) to the Bramford to Twinstead Development Consent Order (DCO) Cadent is a licensed gas transporter under the Gas Act 1986, with a statutory responsibility... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Caroline wolton

    I have concerns regarding cumulative impact of his expansion, accompanied with other projects in the area. The impact on wildlife and the rural landscape will be significant. Residents with properties... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Environment Agency (Environment Agency)

    Please find enclosed our relevant representation for the Bramford to Twinstead NSIP. The Role of the Environment Agency The Environment Agency is a statutory consultee on all applications for... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Essex County Council (Essex County Council)

    Please see comments attached

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Gestingthorpe Parish Council (Gestingthorpe Parish Council)

    Whilst the Parish Council fully support the need to facilitate the transmission of green energy within East Anglia we do have concerns regarding the impact that the proposed methods will have upon the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Historic England (Historic England)

    Historic England The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (HBMCE) is better known as Historic England, and we are the Government’s adviser on all aspects of the historic environment... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • James Bostock

    Lack of suitable consultation Lack of engagement with land owners Consider undergrounding

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Kim Anderson

    There is no need for this destructive project. We want an integrated offshore grid in the North Sea as it has been shown by National Grid ESO to save £2bn and to reduce overall infrastructure by 50%.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • michael sharp

    I live right next to where the haul road will pass. I am concerned how it will affect me. The main issue will be dust caused by the haul road. My property will only be 25meters from the haul road.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Mr R S Donaldson

    The lack of consultation from National Grid, and the inexplicable choice of haul road routes through our village.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Mrs Janet Bond

    My concerns with this project focus on the proposed haul road from A131 towards Twinstead & why such an extensive road is required: > Existing roads cover much of the route. Why is greater use of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    Natural England has submitted it's full Relevant Representations letter by email [see attached]. The following is a summary of Natural England’s Advice: Internationally designated sites • We advise... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP (Addleshaw Goddard LLP) on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)

    APPLICATION BY NATIONAL GRID ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION PLC’S FOR THE NATIONAL GRID (BRAMFORD TO TWINSTEAD REINFORCEMENT) ORDER 202[X] PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE: EN020002 SECTION 56 PLANNING ACT... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Pebmarsh Parish Council (Pebmarsh Parish Council)

    Dear Inspector, National Grid are proposing to acquire a permanent right of access across two farms in our village. Pebmarsh Parish Council did not receive sufficient detail and information prior to... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Land Partners LLP (Land Partners LLP) on behalf of Peter Nott (Peter Nott)

    REPRESENTATION IN RESPECT OF THE BRAMFORD TO TWINSTEAD PROJECT SUBMITTED BY LAND PARTNERS LLP AS AGENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MR P J NOTT OF COLLINS FARM, PEBMARSH, HALSTEAD, ESSEX, CO9 2SQ... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Philippa Harding

    There is no need for this destructive project. We want an integrated offshore grid in the North Sea as it has been shown by National Grid ESO to save £2bn and to reduce overall infrastructure by 50%.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Richard Stephen Best

    My main concern is that damage to the countryside will be made good and that replaced trees/vegetation etc. will be maintained until mature enough to be left alone. I wish to note a minor amendment to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Land Partners LLP (Land Partners LLP) on behalf of Robert Shelley (Robert Shelley)

    REPRESENTATION IN RESPECT OF THE BRAMFORD TO TWINSTEAD PROJECT SUBMITTED BY LAND PARTNERS LLP AS AGENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MR ROBERT SHELLEY OF WOOD FARM, GIPPING, STOWMARKET, SUFFOLK, IP14 4RN Mr... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB))

    The Bramford to Twinstead Development Consent Order Application Planning Inspectorate Reference: EN20002 Relevant Representation from the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds 18 July 2023 1.... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Sarah Burgess

    The consultation process has been sent out via post and social media, there has been no public discussion from national grid with the villages to discuss this haul road. The time scale seems initially... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Stoke by Nayland Parish Council (Stoke by Nayland Parish Council)

    Whilst we welcome some of the changes that have been advanced by the promoter since the scheme was first proposed, we believe that the scheme currently before you could and should do more to mitigate... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Suffolk County Council (Suffolk County Council)

    (See attached)

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Suffolk Preservation Society (Suffolk Preservation Society)

    The Suffolk Preservation Society (the SPS) is a non-political, independent, self-funding charity that was established in 1929. Its charitable objects are to “promote the conservation, protection and... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • The Residents of Woodview Barn (The Residents of Woodview Barn) on behalf of The Residents of Woodview Barn (The Residents of Woodview Barn)

    We would like to be kept upto date with progress of the project as there is a proposed temporary road being laid in our neighbouring property which will potentially impact on the access to our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • The Woodland Trust (The Woodland Trust)

    The Woodland Trust welcomes the opportunity to register a representation to the following project. We object to the proposed scheme due to the loss of T378, an oak tree recognised as veteran within... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Alphamstone & Lamarsh Parish Council (Alphamstone & Lamarsh Parish Council)

    1. Alphamstone & Lamarsh Parish Council proposes measures to mitigate further the disruption to habitats and dwellings, particularly Hill Farm House at the northern end of Moat Lane. Alphamstone &... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Burstall Parish Council (Burstall Parish Council)

    The Bramford substation, its connected infrastructure and other related developments are within the Bramford and Burstall parish boundaries. This infrastructure complex is also visible from parts of... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Brown & Co (Brown & Co) on behalf of D P Nott & Sons (D P Nott & Sons)

    REPRESENTATION IN RESPECT OF THE BRAMFORD TO TWINSTEAD PROJECT SUBMITTED BY BROWN & CO PROPERTY CONSULTANTS AS AGENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MR G V S NOTT OF MAGNOLIA HOUSE, PEBMARSH, HALSTEAD, ESSEX,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Stour Valley Partnership (Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Stour Valley Partnership)

    These Relevant Representations are made on behalf of the Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Stour Valley Partnership. This un-constituted Partnership is made up of around 20... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Francis Prosser

    Summary of key points • Inadequate consultation process. • Flawed environmental and ecological arguments. • Discounting of a preferred better and cheaper route option which resulted from consultation.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Hadleigh Town Council (Hadleigh Town Council)

    Hadleigh Town Council's Planning Committee are concerned about these proposals due to the damage to the environment that this will cause. Although we appreciate the work is required the work should be... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Judith Ewing

    All lines should go under the sea.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Mrs Helen Neal

    Previously we were advised that all site traffic would be using the temporary haul road and that Henny Road would not be used for site access. However my concerns now are the potential use of Henny... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Nick Miller

    ALPHAMSTONE Submission to Inspectors July 2023 - Nick Miller BA (Biology), volunteer conservation advisor REQUEST FOR NATIONAL GRID’S APPLICATION TO BE REFUSED LWS = Local Wildlife Site, NG = National... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Oliver Gwinnell

    These works will impact my residential property, I would like to be kept informed

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Pami Nixon

    The project comes very close to Henny Farm and I have concerns about the impact it may have. Would it be possible for someone to come to the house and explain it?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Foot Anstey LLP (Foot Anstey LLP) on behalf of Pivoted Power LLP (Pivoted Power LLP)

    1. Pivoted Power LLP (“Pivoted Power”) has an interest in part of the Order Land by way of a Lease dated 16 June 2023. It is also a statutory undertaker as it has an electricity generation licence. 2.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Strutt and Parker (Strutt and Parker)

    I am writing on behalf the Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance who own land across the county and have been affected to date by surveys taken in regards to this project.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • William Longdon

    The noise of the construction and the duration will be highly distributive to our living. We have livestock and equines on our property which will be negatively affected. We have attended village... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Joyce Georgina Evans

    Re: Lack of consultation since revival of project and National Grids Provision for Associated Developments etc. As follows: .No time scale clarified regarding removal of 132Kv pylon from my land and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023