Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Bramford to Twinstead

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 26 to 50 of 138 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Philippa Harding

    There is no need for this destructive project. We want an integrated offshore grid in the North Sea as it has been shown by National Grid ESO to save £2bn and to reduce overall infrastructure by 50%.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Richard Stephen Best

    My main concern is that damage to the countryside will be made good and that replaced trees/vegetation etc. will be maintained until mature enough to be left alone. I wish to note a minor amendment to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Land Partners LLP (Land Partners LLP) on behalf of Robert Shelley (Robert Shelley)

    REPRESENTATION IN RESPECT OF THE BRAMFORD TO TWINSTEAD PROJECT SUBMITTED BY LAND PARTNERS LLP AS AGENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MR ROBERT SHELLEY OF WOOD FARM, GIPPING, STOWMARKET, SUFFOLK, IP14 4RN Mr... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB))

    The Bramford to Twinstead Development Consent Order Application Planning Inspectorate Reference: EN20002 Relevant Representation from the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds 18 July 2023 1.... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Sarah Burgess

    The consultation process has been sent out via post and social media, there has been no public discussion from national grid with the villages to discuss this haul road. The time scale seems initially... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Stoke by Nayland Parish Council (Stoke by Nayland Parish Council)

    Whilst we welcome some of the changes that have been advanced by the promoter since the scheme was first proposed, we believe that the scheme currently before you could and should do more to mitigate... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Suffolk County Council (Suffolk County Council)

    (See attached)

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Suffolk Preservation Society (Suffolk Preservation Society)

    The Suffolk Preservation Society (the SPS) is a non-political, independent, self-funding charity that was established in 1929. Its charitable objects are to “promote the conservation, protection and... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • The Residents of Woodview Barn (The Residents of Woodview Barn) on behalf of The Residents of Woodview Barn (The Residents of Woodview Barn)

    We would like to be kept upto date with progress of the project as there is a proposed temporary road being laid in our neighbouring property which will potentially impact on the access to our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • The Woodland Trust (The Woodland Trust)

    The Woodland Trust welcomes the opportunity to register a representation to the following project. We object to the proposed scheme due to the loss of T378, an oak tree recognised as veteran within... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Alphamstone & Lamarsh Parish Council (Alphamstone & Lamarsh Parish Council)

    1. Alphamstone & Lamarsh Parish Council proposes measures to mitigate further the disruption to habitats and dwellings, particularly Hill Farm House at the northern end of Moat Lane. Alphamstone &... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Burstall Parish Council (Burstall Parish Council)

    The Bramford substation, its connected infrastructure and other related developments are within the Bramford and Burstall parish boundaries. This infrastructure complex is also visible from parts of... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Brown & Co (Brown & Co) on behalf of D P Nott & Sons (D P Nott & Sons)

    REPRESENTATION IN RESPECT OF THE BRAMFORD TO TWINSTEAD PROJECT SUBMITTED BY BROWN & CO PROPERTY CONSULTANTS AS AGENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MR G V S NOTT OF MAGNOLIA HOUSE, PEBMARSH, HALSTEAD, ESSEX,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Stour Valley Partnership (Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Stour Valley Partnership)

    These Relevant Representations are made on behalf of the Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Stour Valley Partnership. This un-constituted Partnership is made up of around 20... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Francis Prosser

    Summary of key points • Inadequate consultation process. • Flawed environmental and ecological arguments. • Discounting of a preferred better and cheaper route option which resulted from consultation.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Hadleigh Town Council (Hadleigh Town Council)

    Hadleigh Town Council's Planning Committee are concerned about these proposals due to the damage to the environment that this will cause. Although we appreciate the work is required the work should be... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Judith Ewing

    All lines should go under the sea.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Mrs Helen Neal

    Previously we were advised that all site traffic would be using the temporary haul road and that Henny Road would not be used for site access. However my concerns now are the potential use of Henny... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Nick Miller

    ALPHAMSTONE Submission to Inspectors July 2023 - Nick Miller BA (Biology), volunteer conservation advisor REQUEST FOR NATIONAL GRID’S APPLICATION TO BE REFUSED LWS = Local Wildlife Site, NG = National... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Oliver Gwinnell

    These works will impact my residential property, I would like to be kept informed

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Pami Nixon

    The project comes very close to Henny Farm and I have concerns about the impact it may have. Would it be possible for someone to come to the house and explain it?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Foot Anstey LLP (Foot Anstey LLP) on behalf of Pivoted Power LLP (Pivoted Power LLP)

    1. Pivoted Power LLP (“Pivoted Power”) has an interest in part of the Order Land by way of a Lease dated 16 June 2023. It is also a statutory undertaker as it has an electricity generation licence. 2.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Strutt and Parker (Strutt and Parker)

    I am writing on behalf the Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance who own land across the county and have been affected to date by surveys taken in regards to this project.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • William Longdon

    The noise of the construction and the duration will be highly distributive to our living. We have livestock and equines on our property which will be negatively affected. We have attended village... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 July 2023

  • Joyce Georgina Evans

    Re: Lack of consultation since revival of project and National Grids Provision for Associated Developments etc. As follows: .No time scale clarified regarding removal of 132Kv pylon from my land and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 16 July 2023