Filter

A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 676 to 700 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Linda Francavilla

    I feel that there would be irreparable damage to this unique Heritage site that has visitors from all over the world. Advisers from UNESCO say this scheme shouldn't go ahead as planned. Also I... Read more

  • Linda Rudolph

    Any alteration of the road system in the area of Stonehenge would in my opinion alter the sanctity of the landscape. Probably in your opinion not a very valid, however not everything has to be... Read more

  • Lisa l Frampton

    It is about the lives of the creatures who live in the area and they will lose their habitats.

  • Lucia Birch

    Very Simply I regard Stonehenge as a sacred site for all humanity. The proposed changes to the road system are not only destructive to the land but also to the essence of this site on every... Read more

  • Lucy Phillips

    Damage to heritage site. Impact on wildlife. Noise from roads. Encourage more traffic and car use.

  • Lucy Wildblood

    I will be opposing the current plans for the A303 express way.

  • Maddy Tanner

    I am concerned about the damage to this unique site that has already been done - Blick Mead, and will be done further under this scheme. This is priceless history that will be lost forever. Build a... Read more

  • Margaret Muirhead

    I do not fully understand all your proposals but as a Pagan who cares about the land, I know this will destroy the ley line energies associated with Stonehenge and the other monuments. It will spoil... Read more

  • Mark Linfield

    This scheme will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Ste, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel.

  • Michael Amos

    The proposed underpass development is not comprehensive enough to protect the area surrounding Stonehenge which is also of major archaeological significance.

  • Miss J Turner

    I am concerned about the potentially detrimental impact of the proposals for road changes around the Stonehenge site and immediate vicinity with particular relevance to; 1. archaeological impact -... Read more

  • Mr Bruce Coleman

    I object to the proposal on the following grounds: 1. That there is significant risk of damage to an area of enormous international archeological significance. 2. That I believe that it a waste... Read more

  • Mr Don Donovan

    I am against any development that threatens Stonehenge.

  • Mrs R Perrow

    As a frequent traveller on this route, I am aware of the traffic and scenic issues involved. However, this World Heritage Site, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’, must take... Read more

  • Ms Christine M Wheatley

    I am objecting to this scheme as it will cause irreparable damage to one of the greatest archaeological sites sites in the world, which has yet to be fully excavated. It will also separate the... Read more

  • Ms D Richens

    There are countless quantities of 'unknown archeology' around the site of Stonehenge and the surrounding countryside. The damage you will do to this site is irreparable not only to the geological... Read more

  • Ms Jeanne Spinks

    I am very concerned that this construction will cause damage which can never be undone to the archaeology of what is a WORLD a heritage site. This is not a site which the UK alone should be allowed... Read more

  • Neil Sutherland

    The Stonehenge site and surrounding area is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. This is a unique site which we hold in trust for future generations. The current proposals for the... Read more

  • Nic Lee

    Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present... Read more

  • Nigel Gilderson

    The world heritage site should be respected as an archaeological and educational resource that remains intact for generations to come.

  • Nigel Gill

    The proposal will cause damage to the unique environment surrounding Stonehenge. The entire area is as important as the stones themselves. If not, we could move the stones elsewhere. So we have to... Read more

  • Nile Nugnez

    These are my reasons to object: - Irreparable damage to this WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’; - UNESCO’s international advisers say the... Read more

  • Patricia Shaw

    The importance of this site - not only in the UK, but within the global setting of it, - has not yet even been partially understood! Especially in terms of its links to other cultures of similar eras,... Read more

  • Penelope Andrews

    Damage and desecration to not only a world heritage site but a sacred site to many Britons including myself, the landscape is rare and must not be damaged further.

  • Penny Gaines

    I am really concerned about the effects of tunneling in the area around Stonehenge on the potential archeology of the area. While the actual tunnel itself is problematic, there is also risk to... Read more