Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Much more research must be carried out before this site should even be thought about for this sort of developement we still know nothing of what it was used for and why. The developement will destroy...
Read more
-
The open space surrounding Stonehenge is part of the whole site - to damage it would be to damage Stonehenge.
Secondly, Stonehenge has great dignity, which can only be appreciated in peace and...
Read more
-
The area is part of a World Heritage Site. Signifcant headway has been made in recent years in terms of archaeological investigation and we are finally beginning to grasp a greater understanding of...
Read more
-
I believe that the proposal is unethical and morally wrong in that stonehenge was gifted to all the people for their pleasure an apriciation not for the few to view at and exorbitant cost.
-
I have great interest in conserving the beauty of our British heritage, and my opinion is that the A303 dual carriageway and tunnel scheme would irreparably, and negatively change the archeology of...
Read more
-
1) Irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage site. UNESCO opposes the current proposal.
2) Severe damage to the habitat of rare bird species.
3) Increased traffic - both volume and speed, both...
Read more
-
I am in fundamental disagreement with this unaffordable road enlargement scheme. Better alternatives have apparently not been properly investigated and evaluated.
-
I am writing to object that this proposed fails to meet it objective in reducing congestion on the A303, it will simply transfer the congestion creating new bottle necks at the roundabout that feed...
Read more
-
I have the strongest objection to the plans because they will damage a World Heritage site and displace (or worse) rare and valuable wildlife species.
-
The disturbance to the archaeology landscape will be irreversible. As a retired Military Archaeologists I realise that even the surface may have hidden archaeology such as tenuous remains of the WW1...
Read more
-
I regularly visit Stonehenge and travel in the surrounding areas. A diversion of the A303 either by tunnel or overland in the immediate vicinity of Stonehenge would
1. Potentially damage with...
Read more
-
- Where are alternative options in consultation that aren't damaging to a Unesco World Heritage Site
- What about certain damage to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site?
- WHS will be damaged, this is a...
Read more
-
I object to this road scheme because the whole of the area surrounding Stonehenge is of historic importance and the scheme as planned would destroy much which can never be replaced.
-
Stonehenge is a valuable part of our heritage and should be protected.
The proposed road is in an inappropriate location far too close to Stonehenge.
I object to this planning proposal.
-
Dear Sirs,
I am most perturbed by your intentions to build a highway so close to Stonehenge. This is an ancient site that is tremendously meaningful to many, many people. To say nothing of the...
Read more
-
I understand from various experts that this development will cause irreversible damage to prehistoric sites of national and international importance. I feel particularly concerned about this as a...
Read more
-
My concerns regarding the proposed changes to the A303 route in the Stonehenge area are many. As a World Heritage Site and a place of supreme importance to so many people from numerous nations beside...
Read more
-
Don't destroy this sacred site. Once it is gone it is gone forever. Digging under it will csuse immeasurable harm to artifacts buried by time.
-
Why not just make it a dual carriageway. With a tunnel, no-one will be able to see the stones unless they pay to go in. This is a PUBLIC amenity not a fund raiser for the NT/EH.
This is a major...
Read more
-
These are my reasons for objecting to this abhorant suggestion:
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
I represent myself as a concerned human being with an interest in preserving sites of enormous culture value to future generations.
-
I believe that the proposal will cause irreparable damage to this unparalleled site which will be unable to be undone. International advisors from UNESCO say the plan shouldn't go ahead and there are...
Read more
-
My interest is in preserving this internationally important site and all historic artifacts on it as a historic resource of the highest importance. Any activity that threatens to disrupt the important...
Read more
-
It is an outrage that any governing authority believes it appropriate to disregard our heritage! You have no right what so ever! You believe you can do what you want to the people and the land, well...
Read more
-
Please reject the proposals. They will have a very damaging effect on this unique monument.