Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I object to a World Heritage Site of this size & importance having a an obtrusive tunnel built within its boundaries.
There is still insufficient knowledge of the full extent of the complexity of the...
Read more
-
I know this landscape well and think there are many new discoveries still to be made, which will be jeopardised if this scheme is allowed to go ahead in its current form. Its not just about...
Read more
-
I was raised on a farm in the southern part of the World Heritage Site and now work for the family business. I feel very privileged to have grown up in such a unique landscape and I never cease to be...
Read more
-
From what I understand the building of the tunnel would permanently damage an ancient site. Given that this work would be irreversible I'd strongly support delaying - in 10 years the need to reduce...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the damage to the archaeology in particular at the entrance to the tunnels. The tunnels are too short and start in the midst of phenomenal archaeology. The current plan will...
Read more
-
Ruth Manvell – Winterbourne Stoke resident
As a Winterbourne Stoke resident, I recognise the traffic problem in the area. However, I strongly feel that the proposed route is the wrong decision. The...
Read more
-
It's deplorable! The necessity of speed in the 21st century is impacting on the environment with devastating and catastrophic consequences! It must be stopped. There is absolutely no need for it at...
Read more
-
Salmon & Trout Conservation UK (S&TC UK) was established in 1903 as the Salmon & Trout Association. Having gained charitable status in 2008, we are now the only UK fisheries charity that openly...
Read more
-
The potential desecration of the Blick Mead mesolithic site is unconscionable, and is my reason for objecting to the proposals.
-
Although I do not live locally to Stonehenge or Salisbury, I travel extensively in the region and am therefore familiar with the area under discussion. I have many concerns about the proposed tunnel,...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a Unesco site of apparent beauty (a landscape without parallel) the proposed theme will undoubtably cause irreparable damage to Stonehenge, its archaeology and setting.UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
I am concerned that it will irreparably damage a World Heritage Site.
-
I believe that there should not be any new building or tunnelling close to Stone Henge - it is too valuable a heritage site. Such work is too risky. There maybe other buried historical sites that...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is part of our history and heritage and should be preserved at all costs. A tunnel or bypass will.not reduce the traffic problems on the A303 but shift them elsewhere on the road . Thers is...
Read more
-
To dig a tunnel under such an important ancient monument is simply not acceptable. As a practicing english pagan I am shocked and upset that Stonehenge could be so tampered with. surely another...
Read more
-
I do not agree this work should take place it will ruin the natural wildlife and disturb remains that are sacred. if this work goes ahead it will be very bad indeed for all those who are involved.
-
It will disastrous all around for this sacred site to be made into a fast track for the gullible and disresptful profiteers and tourists alike. Can you ever imagine this happening beneath the Giza...
Read more
-
There must be an alternative.sutely even the potential damage to this amazing monolithic site is not worth the risk, without taking into consideration the preservation of our wildlife
-
Dear Sir/Madam
I am disappointed that such a destructive scheme concerning the A303 at Stonehenge as has been presented by Highways England has proceeded this far. Therefore I take this opportunity...
Read more
-
Stonehenge and its surroundings are a unique site of human heritage and should NOT be despoiled by a road cutting through the nearby environment for the sake of short-term transport convenience.
-
My objection is two fold.
I believe the site will be damaged by the construction of this tunnel. Either accidentally or in the interests of completing the construction on schedule.
I also believe...
Read more
-
I object to these plans on the basis that the works that will be carried out may disturb or cause significant damage to a world renowned historical site, not to mention a holy site. As has been the...
Read more
-
Hello,
This is a symbol of the UK and the ancient world. There are billions of roads and highways but there in the world only 1 Stonehenge.
Please don't allow desecration of this special and...
Read more
-
This proposals, if approved, would harm considerably a heritage site of international importance. It is therefore contrary to Section 16 of the NPPF (Conserving and enhancing the historic...
Read more
-
Unnecessary harm to a WORLD heritage site