Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 801 to 850 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Andrew Moore

    I am opposed to the Ltc because I do not believe that it will not achieve the objectives of lowering the traffic numbers at the Dartford crossing. In turn lower emissions, noise, and traffic at the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Anna Bryant

    The stated aim of the project is to reduce congestion at the Dartford Crossing. However the proposal for the LTC does not achieve this aim, as it does not alleviate the problems at Dartford in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Brian Maurice Murphy

    Additional pollution arising in an already heavily polluted area is unacceptable. The congestion on local roads in particular the A13 and A 128 , acting as feeder roads for the new A13 junction.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • C.Dawson

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Camille Simonet

    In the context of climate breakdown, the LTC road project is not fit for purpose. By providing more road capacity, it will inevitably increase traffic. This compromises our ability to meet Net Zero... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Charles Perceval

    The Lower Thames Crossing scheme as proposed by National Highways is excessively detrimental to the environment damaging to to the local area and the local people and enormously expensive. It goes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Charlotte Lyons

    This absolutely cannot go ahead. The damage to the local environment, animals and eco system would be catastrophic and enough damage is already being caused in other areas of the country.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Strutt & Parker (Strutt & Parker) on behalf of Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance (CDBF) (Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance (CDBF))

    This summary sets out the key concerns of the Chelmsford Diocesan Board of Finance (CDBF). The CDBF’s concerns are set out in full in a letter dated 21st February 2023 to Sarah Collins, Head of Land,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Christine Bell

    I am against the lower Thames crossing because of the impact on wildlife. This includes the biodiversity loss such as water voles, reptiles and all insects. There will also be damage and irretrievable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Cobham Parish Council (Cobham Parish Council)

    I am the Vice chair of Cobham Parish Council, and this represents the opinions and concerns of my fellow parish councillors and I. During the consultation period we have been working with the LTC... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • BTF Partnership (BTF Partnership) on behalf of Cole Family (Cole Family)

    Representations on behalf of Alex Nyman Alison Jean Bush Amanda Mary Harborne Ann Louise Cole Chloe Evans C.H. Cole & Sons (Mill House) C.H. Cole & Sons (Heath Place) C.H. Cole & Sons (Cherry Orchard)... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Colin Kidner

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Cycle Advocacy Network (Cycle Advocacy Network)

    Cycling UK’s Cycle Advocacy Network (CAN) brings together people with a shared interest in creating the conditions that enable more people to cycle, including better infrastructure for cycling and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • David Cowlbeck

    I wish to make representation with respect to the following areas of concern: - Wildlife - the LTC development would have severe harmful implications to wildlife and habitats, from Biodiversity loss... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Debra Malyon

    Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats, including ancient woodland and local wildlife sites. Increased noise and lighting disturb... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Derek West

    I object to the proposed lower Thames Crossing on the grounds of the environmental impact and it is not compatible with with the Government's policy on greenhouse gas reductions.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Braeside Developments Ltd (Braeside Developments Ltd) on behalf of DHL Supply Chain Ltd (DHL Supply Chain Ltd)

    1. DHL supports the Project in general as a major infrastructure improvement and potential economic driver. 2. DHL objects to the lack of connectivity to the Thurrock Urban Fringe where various growth... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Dr David Macpherson

    I strongly object to the Lower Thames Crossing presently under consideration. These enormously expensive - did I read possibly £5 billion ? - and highly destructive infrastructure projects must be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Elizabeth Mary Murphy

    Additional pollution in our area and loss of productive farmland.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Frances Sladden

    I have lived in Thurrock all my life and the roads around us now , due to the M25 and Dartford crossing have polluted and destroyed so much and trapped us residents at times when the bridge is shut.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Staff member of Gareth Johnson MP (Staff member of Gareth Johnson MP ) on behalf of Gareth Johnson MP (Gareth Johnson MP )

    I am fully supportive of the Lower Thames Crossing. As the MP for Dartford, the single biggest issue in the town is the problematic traffic caused by the Dartford Crossing. Every time there is a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Gary Davidoff

    Being a member of the public that will be living in a rural area of south Ockendon I’m worried about this impact of the new road firstly the disruption in building this new road the noise & the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Geoffrey Martin Gibbs

    There are higher priorities for addressing trunk road issues such as the A27 at Worthing.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Gillian Jones

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: •Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. •Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Graham Parker

    The proposed crossing will considerably increase the pollution in Thurrock which already has a Thames crossing. The route will ruin the countryside disturbing many species of wildlife and vegetation.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Gravesham Rights of Way Committee (Gravesham Rights of Way Committee)

    Our members are concerned with the impact the crossing, both during construction and in operation, will have on the rural areas and villages where they live and the countryside access enjoyed by all... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • James Adams

    I am wholly in support of Essex Wildlife Trust's fundamentally opposition to the plans for a Lower Thames Crossing As they have stated there are serious concerns about the impact of these proposals on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Jane Smith

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Jean Rogers

    This crossing wouldn’t solve the problems suffered in Thurrock, which gets gridlocked when there are accidents or breakdowns. There are a lack of connections and local traffic is unable to move due to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • John Blake

    I am strongly against the Lower Thames Crossing for the following reasons and more. It's not going to do the job it's supposed to do. It's in the wrong position, and should have had more consultation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • John Short

    I would like to discuss issues of the Environmental Impact that LTC will bring to the areas where it is proposed to pass through. Issues such as Pollution - Heavy Construction, Construction Machinery,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Josephine Delaney

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Julia Colley

    I am strongly opposed to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing. It is clear from looking at capacity figures that it would not solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing. Furthermore there... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Julie Chaney

    As a resident of Essex and witness to what appears to be a huge amount of unbridled development (buildings and infrastructure) on open spaces right across our county, the Lower Thames Crossing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Karine Suhrbier

    The proposed LTC would be hugely destructive and harmful, it would destroy and impact homes, lives, health and wellbeing, greenbelt, woodland (inc ancient woodland), agricultural land (inc grade 1... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Katy Jarrett

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Whirledge and Nott (Whirledge and Nott) on behalf of M Osborne (M Osborne)

    Mark Osborne as freehold owner has instructed me to submit the following objection to the Lower Thames Crossing (“LTC”) application as his land is included in this. Engagement from National Highways... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • M Salter

    In order to protect our climate from further devastation, and meet our Net Zero goals, it is vital that we cut greenhouse emissions. The government’s Transport & Environment Statistics 2022 state that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Maud Waret

    In order to protect our climate from further devastation, and meet our Net Zero goals, it is vital that we cut greenhouse emissions. The government’s Transport & Environment Statistics 2022 state that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Medebridge Solar Limited (Medebridge Solar Limited)

    Dear Examining Authority, I am writing for and on behalf of Medebridge Solar Limited (MSL), which a ground-mounted solar PV project at land off Fen Lane and Medebridge Road, South Ockendon, Essex (the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Mel Perry

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Michael Ashby

    The 'Lower Thames Crossing' proposal supports reducing congestion at the Dartford crossing and providing more connectivity between Kent and Essex. The proposal also suggests reducing pollution in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Michael Brooks

    The proposed LTC would be hugely destructive and harmful and impact agricultural land woodland, wildlife and habitats.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Mr Michael Enifer

    The LTC in their notice for CPO has provided a plan of 1:100,000 therefore no person can see which land is affected . At the very least a plan of 1:1250 or 1:2500 should be given to those affected.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Muriel Blake

    I wholeheartedly object to the Lower Thames Crossing. It will definitely not solve the congestion and pollution at the Dartford Crossing and will cause even more problems on the local road network... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Natasha Clark

    I have huge concerns that this costly plan will have a negative impact on the environment. It will destroy acres of natural habitat; including ancient woodland, established hedgerows and greenbelt... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Ockendon Solar Limited (Ockendon Solar Limited)

    Dear Examining Authority, I am writing for and on behalf of Ockendon Solar Limited (OSL), which a ground-mounted solar PV project at land off Fen Lane and Medebridge Road, South Ockendon, Essex (the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Pamela Bunton

    I strongly objection to the proposals for the LTC in our area for the following reasons: * It fails on the WHO standard for PM 2.5 which is unacceptable * The carbon emissions would be over 5 million... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Persimmon Homes Essex (Persimmon Homes Essex)

    Persimmon Homes Essex Land Interest: Land at Grey Goose Farm, North-east Greys, Orsett Title Number: EX584003 Status: Inside order limits Persimmon Homes Essex (PHE) supports the Lower Thames Crossing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Peter Rowe

    I wish to register my opposition to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing and agree with the points raised by the Essex Wildlife Trust. these are as follows :- Biodiversity loss, such as water voles,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023