Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 901 to 925 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Dr Tim Stout

    Key Objections 1. Potential breach of government’s legal obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008 c.27 and the Environment Act 2021 c.30, especially in relation to biodiversity and air pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elizabeth Bruce

    I wish to object to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing as it will not solve the traffic problems at Dartford. Most of the traffic comes from the West and won't travel past Dartford to get across the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elke Browning

    I am against the building if the LTC. Carving up huge swathes of green belt so more and more vehicles can travel around London causing massive pollution not needed. The only problem at the existing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Elwyn Lloyd Jones

    We have not seen the route and whether it will impede Thames Shipping. If this is a road link. New ICE cars will end in 2030. I don't believe EVs will replace them. So you'll have NO traffic. Also,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Erik Paul ter Brake

    I believe the new tunnel will induce demand for vehicle traffic in the area. As such the impact on the local residents, on congestion and on air quality are all detrimental.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Essex County Council (Essex County Council)

    Essex County Council’s Relevant Representation The Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) scheme as proposed represent a huge step change for how vehicles can cross the Thames, giving an alternative to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Glenn Daniels

    Objection to Location Objection to Noise Pollution Objection to Air Pollution Objection to Loss of Green Belt Objection to poor maps of the proposed plans that exclude majority of the housing in South... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Greater North Kent (Greater North Kent)

    Greater North Kent (GNK) is an alliance of, and collective voice for, the North Kent districts of Dartford, Gravesham, Maidstone and Swale together with Medway Unitary Authority and Kent County... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Greener Camping Club of GB (Greener Camping Club of GB)

    We intend to submit evidence that a piece of land being considered for compulsory purchase for the purpose of "off setting" part of this project cannot be considered or pursued as it is already been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Henrietta Bewley

    The planning inspectorate should consider the impact of: 1. Rising sea levels due to climate change. Sea levels are predicted to rise between 40m and 70m, depending on the world temperature rise. It... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Henry Binns

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • DLA Piper UK LLP (DLA Piper UK LLP) on behalf of HS1 Limited (HS1 Limited)

    We have submitted a full document via email setting out HS1 Limited's relevant representation in respect of the Development Consent Order (“DCO”) application for the proposed A122 Lower Thames... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Jacqui Bedding

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jacqui Mann

    As a local resident I am concerned about the infrastructure of this proposed development including increase in traffic, poor air quality, impact on local roads & destruction of green spaces. I am also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • James Booth

    The LTC will increase traffic on the A227 cutting through to and from the M20 and M26, in particular goods vehicles. NO BUDGET HAS BEEN SET ASIDE TO MITIGATE THIS. NO ACTIONS TO RESTRICT HGV USE OF... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jan Green

    Opposition to the LTC.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jeff Stafford

    Key Objections 1. Potential breach of government’s legal obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008 c.27 and the Environment Act 2021 c.30, especially in relation to biodiversity and air pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Jimmy Allan

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Joanne Taylor

    The project has a heavy effect on my home and surroundings. I therefore wish to be kept informed/updated and provide my input as I have done from the very beginning when this was started. Thank you.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • John Corbett

    The whole project will not achieve the stated aim of significantly reducing traffic at the Dartford Crossing. It still pollute and decimate a semi-rural area and is an expensive ill-conceived white... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • John Dighton

    I object to the LTC because of, 1 Damage to the environment 2 Damage an upheaval to Thurrock and Kent’s people lives and homes. Health with the increase traffic in the area. 3 The cost. We all realise... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Joyce Bell

    I am opposed to the scheme because It will not solve the problems at the Dartford Crossing It will lead to gridlock across North Kent if people try to get from the M25 to the LTC when there are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Julia Lopez MP

    While not an exhaustive list, the main points that I wish to develop in my further detailed representation during the formal examination are: • That I am broadly supportive of the project, recognising... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Birketts LLP (Birketts LLP) on behalf of Kathryn Homes Limited (Kathryn Homes Limited)

    OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Kent Wildlife Trust (Kent Wildlife Trust)

    Kent Wildlife Trust (KWT) engaged with Highways England (“the Applicant”) prior to DCO submission, with a focus on reducing the impacts upon the internationally important habitats of the North Kent... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023