Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 951 to 975 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Philip Leonard Edgar

    No sea wall to prevent flooding where proposed route is going

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Winckworth Sherwood LLP (Winckworth Sherwood LLP) on behalf of Port of London Authority (Port of London Authority)

    1. The Port of London Authority (“PLA”) is the statutory harbour authority for the tidal Thames (the “River”). Its statutory functions include responsibility for conservancy, including dredging and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Punam Chada

    1. Why is the proposal going ahead if it is not going to reduce the required level of traffic away from the Dartford crossing. You have quoted only 4% when much more is needed. 2. You are proposing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Richard Worn

    I have serious concerns about the impact of the Lower Thames Crossing on wildlife and habitats in Essex , including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Birketts LLP (Birketts LLP) on behalf of Runwood Homes Limited (Runwood Homes Limited)

    OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Birketts LLP (Birketts LLP) on behalf of Runwood Properties Limited (Runwood Properties Limited)

    OUTLINE OF MAIN POINTS OF OBJECTION TO LOWER THAMES CROSSING 1. Unacceptable impacts on Whitecroft Care Home, Stanford Road, Orsett, Thurrock, and its residents and employees, due to the magnitude of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sam Wollen

    We do not want the new road to come near Brandon groves for health and environmental reasons to the people that live on the estate as all wildlife around

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sarah Daniels

    Objection to Location Objection to Noise Pollution Objection to Air Pollution Objection to Loss of Green Belt Objection to poor maps of the proposed plans that exclude majority of the housing in South... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sarah Jane Scrace

    The environmental impact on the area will far outweigh any benefits. The years it will take to build causing chaos will double the environmental impact in the area and then it will bring more polygon... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sarah Lovell

    Main points I intend to raise in relation to the application are: Would not solve the problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing and be over capacity before it’s finished. Lack of adequate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Sevenoaks District Council (Sevenoaks District Council)

    Lower Thames Crossing Pre Examination Representation Thank you for notifying Sevenoaks District Council on the formal notification of acceptance for the Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) Development Consent... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Shorne Parish Council (Shorne Parish Council)

    Shorne Parish is located east of Gravesend, a “reverse-L” shape extending from the middle of the A2 in the south to the middle of the Thames in the north. It includes several areas of ancient... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Steve Hackett

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Suami Rocha

    In a climate emergency, there’s no justification for going ahead with this project. The data on this is clear, our planet can’t cope with this and it’s going to increase our dependence on fossil fuels... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Susan Binns

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Susan Fitzjohn

    I am concerned about the impact on traffic on the M2/A2 between M25 interchange at Dartford and going down to the Bluebell Hill interchange, and beyond. The proposed tunnel will increase the amount of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Susan Hammock

    I last submitted consultation comments in September 2021 and my concerns still hold true today. Benefit - I do not agree that a crossing in this location would ease congestion at Dartford. The A2... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Susan Higgins

    I believe the annihilation of the countryside is despicable and the estimated costs far outweigh the benefits. The new roads will increase CO2 pollution, reduce wildlife habitat.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Gateley Hamer Limited (Gateley Hamer Limited) on behalf of Tarmac Building Products Limited (Tarmac Building Products Limited)

    See attached

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Thames Chase Trust (Thames Chase Trust)

    The response provided by the Trust on 19th December 2018 at 16:17:08 for the original statutory consultation remains valid (Response ID ANON-5C4S-Y8ZS-W), particularly in relation to the wider... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Thames Estuary Growth Board (Thames Estuary Growth Board)

    The Thames Estuary Growth Board fully endorses the Lower Thames Crossing application for Development Consent. The Thames Estuary Growth Board combines private and public sector representatives with a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Holmes and Hills Solicitors LLP (Holmes and Hills Solicitors LLP) on behalf of The owner/Occupiers of Foxburrows (The owner/Occupiers of Foxburrows)

    Holmes and Hills LLP is instructed by [Redacted] who are the owner-occupiers of Foxburrows [Redacted]. Part of their property falls within the Lower Thames Crossing DCO Order limits. Our client has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Whirledge and Nott (Whirledge and Nott) on behalf of The owners C/O Rosenholme, Princess Margaret Road (The owners C/O Rosenholme, Princess Margaret Road)

    Mark Osborne, Shaun Osborne and Ms J Bower as freehold owners have instructed me to submit the following objection to the Lower Thames Crossing (“LTC”) application as their land is included in this.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council)

    Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council (TMBC) continues to support the Lower Thames Crossing Project, as we recognise that the existing Dartford Crossing is operating over capacity and there are limited... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023

  • Stantec (Stantec) on behalf of Uniper (Uniper)

    The representation has been prepared by Stantec who are working on behalf of Uniper in relation to the MedwayOne development at the former Kingsnorth Power Station on the Hoo Peninsular in Medway. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 February 2023