Filter
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1101 to 1125 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Tom Hough

    The capacity for extra traffic simply can not be catered for, now or in the future. Traffic already avoids the M23 and cuts through a single lane Market Town high street and past 3 schools. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 October 2023

  • Victoria Anne Taylor

    We live in the current flight path and cannot imagine any more flights - especially during the summer when we cannot keep our windows open for the noise. The impact on the local environment alongside... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 October 2023

  • Adrian Geaves

    I support this application as this represents a cost effective way to upgrade existing assets with significant benefits to the local economy, subject to sensitive handling of any environmental issues... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Anna Turner

    To vote against a second runway at Gatwick due to the huge environmental impacts on our roads and infrastructure

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Anne Upton

    14,000 new jobs? Gatwick Airport cannot fill the jobs available now. The UK is supposed to be cutting down on pollution. How is this helping that goal? There will be more vehicles. More aircraft. More... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Anthony Potter

    IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT OF A SECOND RUNWAY AT GATWICK AIRPORT As the resident of a village on top of the North Downs located no more than about 10 direct miles from the airport, I would like to make... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Ase Eleonora Greenacre

    Amongst many other points, here are a few: The increase in aircraft noise resulting from a greater number of overhead flights. The environmental impact of more frequent flights. The impact of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Brenda Pollack

    The plans for expansion with the new runway should not be allowed to go ahead. The Committee on Climate Change has said that no expansion in aviation should be allowed if we are to meet our climate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Bridget Doughty

    I oppose the proposed expansion of Gatwick Airport. It will have a severe impact upon the infrastructure of this area. Roads and transport are already under severe strain without the disruption and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Cassie Newman

    The proposal at Gatwick airport will see a huge increase in the number of planes flying over the area of Hever and surrounding neighbourhoods. This will not only increase the environmental pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Catarina Goncalves

    I hope it happens. It will bring a lot of jobs to the area. More money. More likelihood of new residential areas. More money for the investment of Crawley, which MUST be invested in!

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Christopher Coumbe

    I wish to register my objection to the proposal for a new runway at Gatwick. The main impacts are more locally obviously noise and, from a more global perspective with 101,000 more flights a year,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Cindy Tenneson

    Too much noise so I personally do not think it should go ahead and bad for the environment

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • David Martin

    I feel there are enough flights over this area as it is. More flights would be unwelcome. There are already prolonged periods when the air traffic noise is very disturbing (especially in the summer... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • David Wenzel

    Register my support for this project

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Dineke van den Bogerd

    The pressure on environment and local people will be too much without sufficient infrastructure: - new reservoirs for drinking water - sufficient renewable energy - quality cycle lanes in plentiful... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Duncan Reed

    I am in full support of building this runway as I think it will generate a lot of revenue for the area, it will also reduce pollution by allowing people to travel less distances to catch planes to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Eastbourne Food Partnership (Eastbourne Food Partnership)

    Impacts on land, farming capacity, air, habitats and local prosperity and detriment to quality of life

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • F Moynihan

    Concerned about the potential impact on the environment, towns and villages around the wider area that will see significantly increased traffic from increase in passengers, workers and during... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Ghislaine Bernard-Hasan

    I fully support the position of the RHRA’s submitted comments (see below) and will add an additional significant concerns which is the obvious negative environmental impact this project will cause on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Unit (High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Unit)

    Section 85 of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 requires all relevant authorities (including all public bodies, local authorities and statutory undertakers) in exercising or performing any... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • IEM Cox

    Noise from overhead flights both day and night Road congestion on A25 through the village Potential pollution and harm to the environment Area of outstanding national beauty Water supplies Wildlife... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • James Basting

    I object to expansion of Gatwick as it will increase emissions pollution and noise pollution.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • James Hayes

    I am in full agreement and support with this project

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023

  • Janine Miles

    I think that it is well overdue. Having lived in the area most of my life, I have seen it grow and Gatwick needs to be bigger. It will be a huge boost to the economy and provide many more jobs. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023