Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Better travel connections, good employment for the County.
-
I object to the expansion as it will increase the noise pollution over Sevenoaks due to flight paths. The noise from planes passing over Sevenoaks is already disturbing. Especially in the summer...
Read more
-
have concerns about the increased noise and pollution levels. If this expansion is allowed to progress this will also have a negative impact on the value of my property. With all the current changes...
Read more
-
I object to the second runway for the following reasons - Our UK government Climate Change Committee. 6th carbon budget. Aviation – states there should be no more airport expansion until there is a...
Read more
-
More air traffic means more noise, pollution and congestion at a time where we have a climate emergency and need to step back from one of the biggest contributors to global warming- air traffic!!!!...
Read more
-
The proposal should be allowed, as its good for growth, both at Gatwick and surrounding areas, it will bring in more jobs, not only to local areas, but uk wide, more money for the uk itself, more...
Read more
-
I live on the flight path already which is noisy enough. To have more flights would be horrendous especially in the night. I strongly object to this. Planes fly over me all the time which I accept as...
Read more
-
Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an application for a new runway and as such does not comply with policy, or the Government’s Aviation Strategy. Gatwick does not have 2...
Read more
-
I do not believe that Gatwick should be allowed to change its emergency runway into a a second runway. What happens if an emergency happens.
-
I am concerned about noise and air pollution. I am already noticing more planes flying over us this summer and when we are in the garden we can hear them. Another runway will make the situation...
Read more
-
Permission to use the emergency runway as a second runway should not be given for safety reasons.
-
Increased pollution, damage to sleep, the list goes on
-
I have concerns about the increase in traffic and air pollution expansion would create along with increased noise pollution. I also have concerns about the required amount of extra housing being built...
Read more
-
The northern runway would be good for jobs during construction, and also afterwards with more flights meaning more people employed at the airport and in the local area I'm for the new runway
-
Gatwick Airport is busy enough already. And the way they run night flights shows low regard for nearby communities regarding noise. There are night restrictions with a limited number of flights, but...
Read more
-
I live under the flight path, where additional flights would cause excessive noise and disturbance (already excessive with existing flights). I am also concerned about the increase in pollution from...
Read more
-
Tonbridge and Malling Green Party oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is in fact a new runway being brought in by the backdoor– · The policy has been...
Read more
-
I object to any further development of Gatwick airport mainly on the grounds that any airport expansion is incompatible with the need to reduce air travel and our carbon footprint, thus endangering...
Read more
-
How much of our beautiful countryside will be destroyed for ever when it is covered in concrete to provide this new runway? No mention has been made of the: Numerous buildings to provide all the extra...
Read more
-
We are concerned that there should be no further Gatwick expansion. In this area we have frequent intrusive aircraft noise, increased pollution levels and significant impact on the environment all of...
Read more
-
I think it is a fantastic idea for the development which will include more development, jobs,increases in property prices and jobs and infrastructure
-
I wish to object to the second runway on the grounds that it will increase carbon emissions, road traffic, noise and air pollution. We cannot afford to increase the release of greenhouse gases,...
Read more
-
We are against the expansion of a second runway at Gatwick Airport due to the impact this will have on Crawley and the surrounding areas. The M23 and M25 are suffering from the volumns of traffic as...
Read more
-
I am fully supportive of the additional runway at London Gatwick. It is essential for jobs and for our place internationally in terms of trade and tourism and is long overdue. In the last 30+ years...
Read more
-
I think it is a good development and will help local employment levels
-
Jersey Farm - DCO Northern Runway at Gatwick Airport Interested Party Registration - for Windsor Developments. We are writing to register our clients Windsor Developments as an interested party, in...
Read more
-
Expansion will bring new employment, business and commercial opportunities to many, it needs to be considered and offset against the additional noise, flight paths, pollution and traffic from more...
Read more
-
Aircraft is highly polluting. We must have fewer flights. It is our duty to preserve our planet for future generations. It is irresponsible to temp people to take unnecessary flights. Aircraft...
Read more
-
The impact of potential / pending airport growth on, and not exclusively, climate heating, the environment, noise and air pollution, physical and mental health, and over reliance on fossil based...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the health impacts arising from the increased number of over-flights, both for myself and my family. I am also concerned about the increased noise levels and air quality impacts...
Read more
-
Noise Pollution Lack of doctors, hospitals, housing, roads, water
-
I object to the proposal. An additional runway will significantly increase already high levels of aircraft noise over this part of the country. Aircraft noise is already intolerable in the summer...
Read more
-
The building of a new runway will have a huge carbon footprint, destroying green space and plants and animals living there. Increased aviation will contribute to pollution and global warming which is...
Read more
-
Expansion of Gatwick 1. would significantly increase aircraft noise in Kent and East Sussex, particularly at night. 2. flies in the face of UK's Net Zero targets. 3. would increase local traffic...
Read more
-
Completely opposed to the second runway as it will have an enormous impact on all the surrounding areas and is definitely not good for the environment
-
I do not support this project. It will increase noise and overflights for those under the flight paths (and others close by) which, in turn, increases pollution & CO2, and is likely to have an adverse...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Comments on Climate Change and Air Quality in the Environmental Statement Contents Greenhouse Gas Emissions PM2.5 Air Quality Criteria and Assessment Model Verification...
Read more
-
The proposed second runway will involve a very substantial increase in aircraft movements leading to yet more noise and disturbance throughout the day, throughout the year. There will also be a...
Read more
-
The project will have a positive effect on the tourism businesses in the Gatwick area. This is an industry that continues to suffer post Covid . This project would support job creation and existing...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – · Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
I am against this proposal for a number of reasons. 1- noise, living as we do under the flightpath to Gatwick we already find it hard to enjoy our garden as the noise from the aircraft mean it is...
Read more
-
I think this is a brilliant opportunity for the local community
-
We must drastically reduce our use of fossil fuel - there is no alternative fuel for aviation. Biofuel is utter greenwash. Most flying is a luxury unavailable to most of the World. An increase in...
Read more
-
Chiddingstone Parish Council comprises of democratically elected Parish Councillors who represent the views of their electors. The Parish Council and parishioners of Chiddingstone object to the...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – • Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Increased activity at Gatwick would mean more people working there and local infrastructure cannot cope, eg local NHS, schools. Increased road traffic, workers and passengers, would mean more cars on...
Read more
-
I am worrried about increased noise and pollution
-
Pollution as I’m (redacted) and already struggle. Noise as I note in the summer planes still going overhead in the early hours of the morning meaning you can’t sleep with your windows open.
-
The majority of aircraft landing at Gatwick seem to route over Groombridge at less than 5000 ft. Flights continue through out the night especially in summer and the noise is so loud to prevent...
Read more