Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 176 to 200 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Stephanie Lee

    There’s going to extra impact on surrounding villages and infrastructure. Decimating wild life habitat and ruining countryside views. Devaluing housing stock also.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephen Fishwick

    A complete farce. Something that in the ideal world would be needed but as the country has been run by charlatans for the past couple of decades, seems completely irrelevant. Daventry is close. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephen George Baker

    The proposed National Rail Interchange at Hinckley would if approved be a disaster for Hinckley itself . Additionally,Burbage common, surrounding villages, Leicestershire and the wider region as a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephen John Waddle

    Given the one million square meters (estimated by Trirax representative) of building footprint and hard standing are in the current plan, how much money is to be spent in mitigation and where? Miles... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stephen Thomas

    Impact on Burbage woods & common for start. There will be an increase in pollution to what is a place of national importance as its one of only a few ancient woodlands. These sites also generate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Steve orton

    100% against this project Damage to wildlife / environment Excess vehicles going through sapcote No infrastructure in sapcote As M 69 opening both directions traffic through the village will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Steve Pownall

    I wish to make known my objection to this planned development. There is already several freight terminals within 20 miles and the whole Leicestershire side of A5 is becoming a continual... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Steven Whitmore

    I write in opposition to the proposed Hinckley national rail freight interchange. I submit that this venture represents a colossal threat to the area, both now and in the future. My reasons are not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Stewart Hook

    I object to the proposal, due to the significant negative impact it would have on Hinckley, Burbage and the surrounding villages, both in the loss of green space, and massive increase in vehicle... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Aitchison Raffety Ltd (Aitchison Raffety Ltd) on behalf of Stoney Stanton Parish Council (Stoney Stanton Parish Council)

    Stoney Stanton Parish Council - Relevant Representation Stoney Stanton forms a settlement located less than 1.5 kilometres from the proposed Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange (NRFI). Stoney... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Sue Allen

    I am concerned about the negative impact that this development will have on the local community in terms of noise, light pollution, extra traffic on already congested roads, the desecration of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Susan Garnor

    I would like to start by saying that our family have lived in the local villages close to the proposed HNRFI site all of our lives and regard this area as being an extremely important piece of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Susan Stevenson

    My main concerns are the impact on the local environment and the increased traffic on already congested local roads

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Susan Taylor

    This rail freight exchange is not needed. There are two alternative railheads nearby (DIRFT to the south and an unused one near Dordon to the north which is close to the M42. There are traffic jams... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Suzanne Deacon

    No more freight trains

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Tara Fox

    Disaster to wildlife and an area of outstanding beauty , greed alone drives this decision , traffic will increase and destroy our green space

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Edward Charles Bryan on behalf of The Bryan Family (The Bryan Family)

    We live very close to junction 2 of the M69 so the development of this site is going to impact our daily lives for many years. Over the last 19 years the traffic on the M69 and the surrounding local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • The Environment Agency (The Environment Agency)

    The Environment Agency's comments focus on those environmental aspects for which we have either a statutory remit, or interest in through legislative requirements. On this basis, and in summary, we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Thomas Ronald Payne

    Loss of agriculture space in our area. the congestion on the M69 leading up to M1 has queues over over 2 miles already so this development will make it much worse The affect on the Burbage common... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Titiksha Masand

    As a Sapcote resident I am very concerned about the impact this development will have on our village in terms of traffic, pollution, noise and the environment. I am particularly concerned about the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Tom Nash

    At the moment, my wife and I use the lovely green space for both walking and more importantly, to observe the bird life in the woods. This and other wildlife will badly be affected by the noise and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Tracey hurst

    I’m based right next to the development and have not been contacted personally about the impact it will have on my land and gone this very offensive as it will have a huge impact on my lifestyle

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • UK Health Security Agency (UK Health Security Agency)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Valerie Ann Pole

    1. There are already similar infrastructures in our area which means this development is not needed. The area is already covered. 2. This is prime farmland. We need farmland, we need food. British... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023

  • Vicki Parsons

    There are estimated to be 32 trains daily coming and going resulting in an extra HGV per minute on the roads round Burbage. This will cause unacceptable levels of pollution, noise and road congestion.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 June 2023