Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1126 to 1150 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Laura Patchett

    The increase in already excessively busy traffic to a small town. The increase in building and lack of schools and doctors to accommodate this as well as no new reservoirs being built to supply the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Laura Simpkins

    The main impacts will be: Sufficient local infrastructure to support such a proposal. Road traffic is already horrendous at peak and off peake times. Noise pollution to local residents from freight... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • layton milner

    Increased traffic More noise..Train horns are heard now but with increased trains it can only get worse! Destruction of our beloved Burbage common where families picnic wildlife flourish and one of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Leiah Lamplough

    Having viewed the previous proposal and being disappointed about the lack of detail allowing me to make an informed opinion, I am registering my interest to view the new proposal. There is currently... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Les Bryant

    Totally out of scale and inappropriate for the area. Impact on bio-diversity, cutting Burbage Common off from adjoining countryside. Burbage Common is a natural recreational space, something urgently... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Lis Moeller

    I am very concerned that this project will impact the environment in a negative way. Burbage common is a SSSI. The impact of noice and light pollution is another concern. As a local resident I am also... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Lisa Caroline Woodall

    This will severely impact quality of life with increased traffic and destruction of the one of the only green spaces around here

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Lisa Howes

    If this project was to go ahead it would have an extremely damaging affect on me and all of the hundreds of other people that visit Burbage Common and Woods on a daily basis. This area is our biggest... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Malcolm Bernard Clarke

    I am broadly in favour of the project

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Margaret Godby

    This should never be allowed it will destroy the natural beautiful countryside, people from all over Leicestershire have picnics,walk dogs they will know longer be able to enjoy the peaceful... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Margaret Lawrance

    Impact on wildlife due to more countryside being developed. More trains using this line. More traffic such as lorries going to and from this infrastructure.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Margaret M.M. Riley

    This project will have a dramatic effect on the wildlife and habitats of Burbage common. The local roads cannot take any more heavy traffic. There is already too much 'green space' being used for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Mark Luty

    This proposed project "flies in the face " of all that as a society we are trying to take care of for ourselves and future generations. Burbage Woods and Common are very important to a lot of people... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Mark Thomas Farmer

    The Rail Hub is simply not needed. There is already a rail hub a short distance away in/near Rugby. There is insufficient infrastructure to cope with the additional road traffic that the Hub is bound... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Martyn WILLIAM Reynolds

    This small once green and pleasent land is full.No more immigration,no more concreting over,no more massive warehouses with imported goods and food.Crazy crazy crazy.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Matthew Illston-Barsby

    I am [redacted] and help to run her horse livery business which has been operating for the past 20 years. I do not agree with the planned development as it is not in the correct place for an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Melvyn Stuart Harris

    I understand that the main route for traffic will be via the M69 but there will be a major increase increase in traffic through Burbage. It is proposed that there will be 800 jobs generated and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Michael Anderson

    Traffic impact will be substantial to an already overcrowded and inadequate road network system around this part of Leicestershire. Large warehousing and postal distribution companies have already... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Michael Braybrook

    I believe the biggest issues will be massive increase in traffic through already dangerously overstretched roads through Stoney Stanton and Burbage. The road system already struggles with huge lorries... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • MICHAEL CORBETT

    We use Burbage Common every day. It is beautiful and restful quiet space. The idea of putting a supposed freight station next to our last wild open space is ludicrous. We have many distribution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Michael Dowling

    10 existing/planned warehouse facilities within close proximity. Low unemployment in proposed area - this should be built in high unemployment area. Construction data very scant. Local roads will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Michael Harry Faulks

    Damage to the envirenment, traffic congestion

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Michael John Nuttall

    my main comments as to why I oppose the Hinckley NRFI scheme are: HNRFI isn’t close to the market it is intended to serve - We already have DIRFT to the south and East Midlands Interchange to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Michael perkins

    Our small towns infrastructure will never cope with this. All this will do is make our already overcrowded and difficult to traverse town even worse during the construction phase and afterwards.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Mr and Mrs Harrold (Mr and Mrs Harrold) on behalf of Mr and Mrs Harrold (Mr and Mrs Harrold)

    This representation is from David Harrold and Diana Harrold, a married couple living in Stoney Stanton. We are very worried, and have serious concerns, about the proposed HNRFI development. An outline... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023