Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 151 to 175 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Norman Hood

    I am concerned of the possibility of structural damage to my property due to the impact of increased rail freight traffic (up to 16 extra trains per day) causing increased and heavy vibration effects... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 May 2023

  • Richard Luckett

    Increased traffic and noise though the surrounding villages. This development will have a detrimental impact on the quality of life aof residents of all the surrounding villages with regard to noise... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 May 2023

  • Anne Hackett

    The area around Hinckley is already congested with heavy goods vehicles. The country side around Hinckley has been covered in industrial storage warehouses-enough is enough.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Anthony Richard Green

    A further rail freight interchange (RFI) cannot be justified in this area; there are already five RFIs with a 25 mile radius of Hinckley. In addition the vast Magna Park complex can be served by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Emma Smart

    The proposed development will have an long lasting detrimental impact on such a large area of natural space surrounding Hinckley. Burbage Common and adjacent land is a haven for wildlife and enjoyed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Graham Friston

    So many detrimental factors that this development would cause to the area. Firstly an area of natural beauty (that I have used for over 50 years) will be destroyed or changed beyond recognition.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Mrs Brenda Ann Grant

    We will be Losing our rural village, we do not need to have more warehouses in this relatively small area. This area is actually larger than the initial site of magma park which is now massive. Then... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Paula O’Reilly

    As a resident of a local village that will be massively adversely impacted by this unnecessary project, I strongly object on the following grounds. 1 - It is not needed! There are other rail freight... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Richard Allen

    The proposed development will have a catastrophic effect on the local environment and infrastructure. The applicant has been reticent to provide base traffic data to the County Council to allow formal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 May 2023

  • Alison Ford

    I write to lodge my opposition to the Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange (HNRFI). My ‘consultation response’ covers: Environmental Impact, Highways and Rail Networks, Actual vs Perceived Need,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Anthony David Harding

    I’m all for progress but convince me that this will not be a devaluation of every thing around it, from the environments to peoples living conditions

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Brian Tristam

    This development is unnecessary because the area is already well covered with rail freight depots. It is a random development not fitting into a national strategy. It will substantially adversely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Chris klenk

    This project is in my opinion in totally the wrong location, IT WILL BRING LIGHT POLLUTION,TRAFIC CHACOS TO THE AREA , NOISE POLLUTION , THE VISUAL IMPACT WILL BE INCONCEIVABLE , THE ROAD NETWORK CAN... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Chris M Allen

    If this reduces the number of lorries travelling long distances then this must be beneficial to the environment over the long term.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • JEAN MARGARET BRYANT

    The complete devastation of the area surrounding the Burbage Common. The Common is an important area to locals and is used by people all day every day. Wildlife will be gone never to come back which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Jeffrey Badland

    Although I am personally disappointed that the proposal is in close proximity to where I live, I am broadly supportive of efforts to move freight from road onto rail due to the myriad environmental... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Jonathan Paul musson

    With the local area already loosing so much of its green space I don't think we can afford to loose more of it. The road system in the local area is already carnage with somedays it taking over 45... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Mr Terry Lightfoot

    Pollution from increased road and rail traffic( the railway has not been electrified). Light pollution. The A5 cannot cope with existing traffic due to the large warehouse facilities between... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Peter Jones

    Details of Motorway junction

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Rachel Wareham

    I disagree with this development as we have one around 9 miles away already! Why do we need so many. It is too close to the town and local nature reserve and will destroy our peaceful town This will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 May 2023

  • Bernard John Grimshaw

    This project will have economic benefits of the kind needed for UK growth: both in the construction and ongoing usage and will help retain the relative prosperity of Hinckley and Bosworth, so I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023

  • Chantelle Heinzerling

    There are so many environmental impacts that will be caused by this development. The negatives far outweigh any positives (of which there are few, if any). The traffic impact on the village without a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023

  • Karen white

    Building a freight site would be a nightmare. What about the wildlife there is a lot of road kill now so expect more if you build this plus the roads are terrible as it is more pot hole than smooth... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023

  • Margaret Lewis

    Hinckley rail interchange scheme. I have grave concerns with the scheme, as it seems to be that it is far more motorway focused than rail focused. It will be detrimental to the countryside, and create... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023

  • Mr Brian Tristam

    This development is unnecessary as the local Midlands area is already well served with rail freight hubs and it is not part of any national strategy. The size of the development will have a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 May 2023