Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 701 to 725 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Karen Leck

    Sharnford is a small village around 3 miles away from the HNRFI project. The village already experiences heavy traffic, due to its proximity to the A5, Magna Park at Lutterworth and the new DPD... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Liam Paul Mahoney

    The development is not needed. There are already ample similar facilities in close proximity to the proposed location. The business case for this development does not stack up. The assessment of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Linda Simpkin

    Road infrastructure - it is suggested that there will be a link road built and the M69 will also be used. What happens when there are problems on these roads? Sapcote and Stoney Stanton have now been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Mark Davis

    I don’t support the destruction of green spaces associated with this project. I don’t support the increase in noise and traffic pollution associated with this project. I don’t support the increase in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Mark Taft

    I feel that this project is not required in this part of the country. There are other existing freight interchange terminals and warehousing within a 50 mile radius, why is there a need for more. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Michael Walton

    it will decimate the wildlife, and the road and rail infrastructure here isn't good enough to support all of the extra trains and lorries. What about the huge environmental impact it will have on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Mike Broadhurst

    The impact of this is the amount of heavy goods traffic and cars on the surrounding areas of Hinckley, Elmesthorpe, Stoney Stanton and Sapcote. Also the amount of environmental damage it will do the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Monty John Cooper

    Destruction of land near Burbage common. Total blockage of road at Narborough level crossing with increased rail freight. Increased HGV activity through local villages that are already at capacity.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Natalie Squires

    Increased rail traffic causing noise pollution Increased road traffic causing congestion

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Norma Ann Gudger

    I object to the proposed Hinckley National Freight interchange. It will destroy a large park of beautiful common land, which will result in a loss of wildlife. The increased traffic and noise will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Rachel Small

    This would devastate the area, the noise and light pollution, devastating wildlife habitats and the road infrastructure in the surrounding villages cannot cope with the additional traffic this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Richard Wade

    Impact on the local population, regarding the additional strain on the areas road network and the devistating affect on the wildlife and eco system, which is part of the "green lung" for the Hinckley... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Ricki Moore

    This will have a detrimental affect on the roads in the area which are congested and struggling to cope with the current level of traffic created by other large warehousing recently built in the area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Rodney Leigh

    I am strongly against the proposal of the HNRFI. For me and my family it would personally cause us terrible problems to our 'every day life'. We retired and purchased our farm to tend for our animals... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Save Burbage Common (Save Burbage Common)

    1. The area in which this development is proposed is already served by a large number of existing or agreed distribution centres, including rail freight interchanges. This includes: • Northampton... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Sean Ashton

    Wildlife, pollution, traffic issues in an area that already comes to a daily standstill, noise created

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Sharnford Parish Council (Sharnford Parish Council)

    Sharnford is a small village around 3 miles away from the HNRFI project. The village already experiences heavy traffic, due to its proximity to the A5, Magna Park at Lutterworth and the new DPD... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Shaun Hutchinson

    The negative impact this project will have on the environment and community has not been properly considered. The community is already suffering from the miles of warehouses, increase in heavy... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Tim Hancock Associates (Tim Hancock Associates) on behalf of Shell U.K. Limited (Shell U.K. Limited)

    Dear Sirs We are instructed on behalf of Shell U.K. Limited which owns and operates Sutton Elms Service Station, a high-quality roadside facility serving all categories of road traffic, located on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Stephen Cooper

    Dear Sir / Madam I would like to formally object to the proposed HNRFI and together its status of being considered as a NSIP. My objections fall into 3 main categories: 1/ the need for such a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Susa Dutton

    I live near the corner of Ashby Road which will be greatly affected if this development goes ahead by noise, vibration and extreme pollution 24/7 Will Tritax be responsible for any damage to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Tracey Baldwin

    Environmental issues such as light pollution, noise. Location of warehouses near to villages, and spoiling Burbage common & woods, affecting wildlife. Traffic noise from increase traffic. air quality

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 June 2023

  • Amanda Mathieson

    I feel there are a number of negative impacts which have prompted me to object to the proposed Hinckley rail freight terminal, these are. 1) the impact on traffic both from increased road traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 June 2023

  • Andrea Margaret Collingridge

    It deeply concerns me to see the considerable queues of traffic backing up from the railway line in Narborough when the line is down as the village provides a thoroughfare to destinations on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 June 2023

  • Andy Dennis

    We are writing to register our objection to the HNRFI application. This potential development would have a significantly negative impact on the quality of living in Stoney Stanton and also for the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 June 2023