Filter

Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1201 to 1225 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Steven Wilson

    I am against the proposal

  • Susan Mary Mullett

    The proposed development will totally destroy some of the the beautiful countryside around our village. The development offers no benefit to local people and the greater likelihood is that it will... Read more

  • Susan Osborn

    Road network surrounding the project and up to 20 miles away will not cope with the increased heavy goods vehicles. Lorries regardless proposed links will use the current roads as this is the shortest... Read more

  • susan pope

    1. It will decimate farmland and woodland and destroy the natural habitat for many different species. Furthermore, Tritax were not able to provide any evidence at the consultation that similar managed... Read more

  • Talbert Dick

    Concern over 24/7 noise. Traffic congestion. Effects on the infrastructure, particularly drains and the additional prospect of more flooding. We struggle to cope with existing traffic through the... Read more

  • The Woodland Trust (The Woodland Trust)

    Thank you for the opportunity to register as an interested party for the proposed scheme. The Woodland Trust strongly opposes the loss of T486, a veteran oak tree that is set to be felled for the... Read more

  • Thomas Herbert Griffiths

    If they do the improvements the the roads around the area then I have no objections to the plan we need jobs in this town.

  • Tina Dawn Robinson

    I am worried about the excessive noise, pollution, road congestion on an already over stretched road infrastructure. This project will probably run on a 24 hours and 7 days a week basis. Everybodys... Read more

  • Tom Bradley

    Considerable concerns over the severe impact to local wildlife, countryside amenities being reduced and a wider impact on an already heavily strained road and rail network. There are several, major... Read more

  • Tom Coles

    I am very concerned that the impact this freight exchange will have on the village centre of Narborough has not been considered. The level crossing in the village already delays traffic and causes... Read more

  • Tracey Amanda Demott

    I use the Burbage Common on a daily basis for walking, dog walking and consider it a free of charge leisure activity. It is a beautiful, green open space teaming with wildlife and used by thousands of... Read more

  • Tracey Pratt

    Impact on traffic around Hinckley. Noise of trains.

  • Trevor Kirtley

    The area is saturated existing and new warehousing projects, e.g, Magna Park expansion, Hinckley A5. The M69 is already a severe bottle neck at the M1 junction and additional traffic from the proposed... Read more

  • Valerie Moran

    Daventry is under-used as per report, freight moved down 9% lowest since records began, Freight Lifted down 17% as per October to December report 2022 compared to a year earlier, it's Obvious Daventry... Read more

  • Wayne Ridgway

    Traffic in Hinckley and surrounding area's is getting worse, the roads are not fit for purpose for the amount of lorries and the once beautiful town is expanding on all sides creating more traffic. If... Read more

  • Wendy Howe

    It will impact adversely on the lives of those living in the nearby villages. There will be noise pollution from the trains and lorries, and air pollution from fumes. This will not help climate... Read more

  • Whetstone Parish Council (Whetstone Parish Council)

    Lack of mitigation offered at both Highways Infrastructure and impact on local existing neighbourhoods,

  • Wigston Parva Parish Meeting (Wigston Parva Parish Meeting)

    Initial observations and objections from Wigston Parva Parish as part of registration are as follows. More detail will be added as the proposed project application process continues: The application... Read more

  • Y. Daniel

    Traffic management/volume of traffic on already busy roads. Impact on Burbage Common, a well used open space full of wildlife, flora and fauna that will be greatly impacted by noise pollution during... Read more

  • A Tye

    My concern is the impact on wildlife in the area caused by building, increased traffic, air, light and noise pollution, etc. Wildlife and the environment are much more important than a rail freight... Read more

  • Alan Parker

    1. Additional pollution from the thousands of trucks per day will negatively impact Burbage Common, which is right next door. 2. The M69 / M1 junction is not capable of taking the additional traffic... Read more

  • Alexander Luke Toone

    This proposal should not go ahead for the following reasons: a) The existing road infrastructure cannot cope with the current traffic levels especially on the perimeter road and the junction with the... Read more

  • Alexandra Hayes

    Loss of green space in our area. The affect on the Burbage common beauty spot, ie, wildlife, noise, views, visitors mental welfare etc The immense increase in HGV traffic in the local area across a... Read more

  • Alison Deacon

    I went to the consultation information session - Very concerned about the effect on local roads. A road was assumed that I believe is not happening. In theory road traffic should use M69. This is... Read more

  • Alison Langham

    The environmental cost is too high for this project to be considered. Stop putting money and profit above everything else. This area is low in in-employment and is not in need of this project, for... Read more