Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 75 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Colin Martyn Lizieri

    This project is unnecessary, largely benefits shareholders, not local communities and, critically, threatens the local environment, including SSSIs, not least given water companies' track record of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Jon Tollit

    Honey Hill Proposed Sewerage Treatment Works The existing facility at Milton is perfectly viable for needs for many years and does not need relocation. The study to select a site was flawed and did... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Pamela McLeman

    I object to this infrastructure project. Anglian water admits there is no operational need to move. It's a waste of taxpayer money, (£227 million), a scandal, in the light of Thames Water + the debt... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Peter Charles Eric Halford

    My fundamental objection to this planning proposal is that, by Anglian Water’s own admission, there is no operational need for a relocation of Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Works. However if such... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 June 2023

  • Christine Shaw

    The proposal for Honey Hill is very much against Green policies and talk from Government agencies. In these times of global warming I fail to see how it helps the planet or local area to uproot a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • Mark Woolfenden

    I object to the poorly conceived and ill thought through proposed relocation of the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill, between the conservation villages of Fen Ditton and Horningsea. · Moving the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • Mrs Laurie Woolfenden

    Bigger than Wembley, and floodlit I object to the poorly conceived and ill thought through proposed relocation of the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill, between the conservation villages of Fen... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • Rae Langton

    I wish to register as an Interested Party for a reason particular to our own situation, and several more general reasons. The particular reason is that our water supply is entirely from our own well:... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • The Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations (FeCRA) (The Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations (FeCRA))

    Dear Sir/Madam, Anglian Water’s DCO application to relocate the sewage works I am writing on behalf of the Federation of Cambridge Residents Associations’ ( FeCRA) to register as an IP and to object... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 30 June 2023

  • Mark Woolfenden on behalf of John Woolfenden (John Woolfenden)

    SAVE HONEY HILL AT FEN DITTON THE HONEY HILL SITE FOR A PROPOSED NEW SEWERAGE TREATMENT PLANT HAS BEEN ILL -THOUGHT OUT BY OUR 'SUPPOSEDLY’ ILLUSTRIOUS PLANNERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT". THE HONEY HILL... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 July 2023

  • Susan Bates

    I fail to see the need to move the existing site down the road at a cost of £227 million just to build houses also the traffic during construction will cause problems for children on their way to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 July 2023

  • Kathy Broadbent

    This project has not been adequately thought through, the council are building a sewage works on greenbelt land rather than upgrading the existing site on brownfield land because it's cheaper and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 July 2023

  • Michael Kiernan

    The potential siting of a major sewage works just 1.5km from the new build I purchased at Marleigh was never declared by Hill or Marshall at the time of purchase. The enormous environmental impact of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 July 2023

  • Wendy Tina Rose

    I am registering an interest in the land at [Redacted] which was sold with a restrictive covenant in our favour. We would like to state a claim of interest that when [Redacted] was first sold a clause... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 July 2023

  • A Gledhill

    Anglian Water have confirmed that there isn't an operational requirement to move the waste water treatment works. The environmental burden of building the new site and decommissioning and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 July 2023

  • Catherine Sparks

    1 Im very concerned about the building of a large structure on green belt land near Cambridge ,Fen Ditton and Horningsea . There is constant overdevelopment in our area repeatedly destroying green... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 July 2023

  • Colin Ramsay

    As a local Horningsea resident, I'm raising my concerns below with regards to the planned relocation of sewage works to Honey Hill in Cambridge. - Impact on the conservation areas of Fen Ditton and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 July 2023

  • Katharina Faller

    I’m very concerned about the heavy carbon cost of replacing a working sewage works. We live on the new marleigh development and I’m also concerned about the impact it will have on us in terms of odour... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 July 2023

  • L Yarrow

    I object to a private water company being given £227 million of taxpayers money to move from a sight that is able to be used well into the future, just to free up the current sight for Development.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 July 2023

  • Natalya naqvi

    Honey hill sewage plant will cause environmental disaster and increase traffic on high ditch road and Ditton lane to unlivable levels. There are already numerous accidents on this road

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 July 2023

  • Peter Matlock

    Why is there a need to do this in the first place as I believe the existing water treatment facility is more than able to cope with any expansion . This would seem a compete waste of money as well as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 July 2023

  • Dr. Sheila Margaret Porrer

    I wish to register an objection to the proposed construction of a new sewage treatment plant on land near Horningsey and Fen Ditton known as Honey Hill. The grounds of my objection are many, but these... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 July 2023

  • Helen Jane Warnock

    I object to the moving of the Sewage Works to Honey Hill. The CWWTP does not need to move on operational grounds. In 2015 the present works was upgraded to meet the needs of the expansion of Cambridge... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 July 2023

  • Ian Watt

    Dear Sir/Madam, I wish to take this opportunity to express my objection to the proposal to move the sewage works to Honey Hill. First and foremost there is no operational need for this move to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 July 2023

  • Geraldine Roper

    I am concerned about the building of a massive infrastructure on GREENBELT agricultural land, and the impact on our countryside and wildlife , so depleted now. I dont hear enough details on how all... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 July 2023