Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 76 to 100 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Jennifer Krombacher

    Main issues: The project is unnecessary and inappropriate. Honey Hill is an unacceptable choice of site. The project is unnecessary because the existing water treatment works in Milton are fully... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 July 2023

  • Paula Bishop

    I think that this project is so unnecessary given that the water company have already admitted that the current site continues to be fit for purpose. We're living in such financially constrained times... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 July 2023

  • Barbara Le Gallez

    I am opposed to the proposed project, for the following reasons: 1) There is no operational need for it. 2) It will damage the Green Belt, including farmland and recreational areas. 3) It will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Christine Turnbull

    I am wholly opposed to this project particularly as it is so close to a very important aquafer. It is using up valuable GREEN BELT productive agricultural land - still being farmed. It is almost next... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Fiona Bryant

    Comments in relation to economic, social and environmental impact

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Helen le Breton Skaer

    I am not convinced that this scheme is necessary as the current sewage plant at Milton is fit for purpose for the same length of time and for the same predicted population that we are told is the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Howard Aston

    1. The proposed relocation site for the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant (the "Sewage Works") is named Honey Hill and is Green Belt land. Building on Green Belt land is contrary to national and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • J Seamarks

    I am a young person ; I am concerned no developments actually help young people on the property ladder. I am a Key Worker and have no chance of obtaining a £350k mortgage for an affordable home. This... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Karen Briscombe

    I object to the proposed relocation of the Cambridge Sewage Works to Honey Hill, between the conservation villages of Fen Ditton and Horningsea.  Moving the sewage works about a mile down the road, at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Kieran Burke

    There has bee no consideration of the impact on the conservation areas of Fen Ditton and Horningsea. This has been overlooked by Anglian Water. Building on Green Belt land in order to open brown sites... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • Louise Harper

    Objection regarding access and farm land use.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • William Robert Harper

    This project directly impacts farmers, landscape, nature and the local residents to name a few. It will also create a major impact on local pollution and traffic problems

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 July 2023

  • John Sandey

    My objection to the relocation of the sewage works to Honey Hill I have decided to lodge an objection to the construction of a sewage works at Honey Hill. I have set out below the main reasons which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 July 2023

  • Lynn Arnold

    I am very concerned about the building of new sewage outlet for these reasons: The negative impact on conservation area if Fen Ditton and the effect it will have on wildlife and diversity. Building on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 July 2023

  • Rebecca Hollweg

    It is unnecessary, wasteful, unecological and will ruin an area of natural beauty, upsetting many local residents.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 July 2023

  • Abbey Greens Ward Office (Abbey Greens Ward Office)

    I am concerned about the impact of site traffic on a busy junction. Honey Hill is the site of an attractive circular walk and is the gateway to the Wicken Fen nature reserve, so there is a loss of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Alan Hugh Muhr

    I object to the relocation of Cambridge Waste Water Works from Milton to Honey Hill for the following reasons: - the Green Belt status of Honey Hill should be respected. I am very familiar with the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Friends of the Cam (Friends of the Cam)

    Friends of the Cam's primary grounds for objection to moving the Waste Water Treatment Plan from its current site in NE Cambridge to Honey Hill: 1.Demolition and new construction are heavy carbon... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Harriet Wykeham

    The existing plant is fully functional and has been future-proofed. I therefore don't think it's acceptable to build on Green Belt land, and incur both the monetary and carbon cost of that.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Janet Walker

    My objections Inter alia - Impact on the Green Belt, which is contrary to national and local planning policies - likely impact on and important rare chalk aquifer; - Impact on public rights of way,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Jean Williams

    I wish to object to the relocation of the sewage works on the following grounds: It is contrary to several City Council policies, including their declared biodiversity and climate change emergencies.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • nicola marshall

    It should not be relocated to honey hill for environmental reasons and should remain in its current position.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Rhian Benstead

    Why are we using £227 million of taxpayers’ money to fund the completely unnecessary move of a perfectly functionable sewage works from its current location to a green belt area, which is contrary to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • Schia Sinclair

    I don’t think that the sewage works should be relocated at all, to anywhere, and definitely not to an area of green belt. My specific issues are as follows: 1. Building on green belt. 2. The carbon... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 July 2023

  • A Chapman

    I am writing to make clear my objection to the proposed creation of a new Sewage Works at the Honey Hill beauty spot between Horningsea and Fen Ditton. A sewage works should not be built at Honey Hill... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 July 2023