Filter
North Lincolnshire Green Energy Park

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 25 of 94 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Gateley Hamer (Gateley Hamer) on behalf of Andrew Gravel t/a ADG Autotech (Andrew Gravel t/a ADG Autotech)

    Mr Gravel owns and occupies two units on the Flixborough Industrial Estate that will be lost to the scheme. Mr Gravel operates an established independent car repair garage from the units. A... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 August 2022

  • United Kingdom Without Incineration Network (UKWIN) (United Kingdom Without Incineration Network (UKWIN))

    UKWIN objects to the proposed development. Claimed benefits are overstated, and potential adverse impacts are understated. The planning balance goes against the proposal, with associated adverse... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 August 2022

  • Brian Close

    We have no need of this facility it is largely seen as the north being used as London’s rubbish dump. The technology has already failed in Holland where toxins were found in the human food chain. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 August 2022

  • Carol Richardson

    I strongly believe this is wrong for the area. We regularly have the worst air quality of the country and this would only make matters worst. Even if the Green Park could keep emissions to a minimum... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 August 2022

  • Diane Sigsworth

    I wish to keep abreast of developments as the proposal progresses.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 August 2022

  • James O

    I am very concerned about the new project, mainly because of the smell that will no doubt impact on myself and the surrounding area. It will also have an impact on the local environment. The traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 August 2022

  • Kim Golightly

    I'm concerned about,The energy recovery facility, hydrogen production and storage,ash treatment and concrete block manufacturing, the reinstatement of railway and creation of new railhead. Where will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 August 2022

  • Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust (Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust)

    We have already engaged with the developer pre-application and discussed various points. We will be seeking nature's recovery, Biodiversity Net Gain, that all impacts on known local, regional,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 August 2022

  • Ray Barker

    Safety and environmental concerns.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 August 2022

  • Bob Meldrum

    I am a resident of Burton upon Stather, a small village which sits approximately 2 miles north of the proposed site. The proposed site is at sea level and most of Burton upon Stather is 83m above sea... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • Canal & River Trust (Canal & River Trust)

    The Canal & River Trust are the charity who look after and bring to life 2000 miles of canals & rivers. Our waterways contribute to the health and wellbeing of local communities and economies,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • David Hinchcliffe

    The development of the Park would severely impact the village of Amcotts which is directly across the river Trent from the site. We anticipate Massively increased noise pollution from the railway and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • Gail Lockey

    As a resident of [redacted] I am very interested to find out about this park as it will have an impact on me living right next door to it. I am not opposed to it but would like to know in more detail... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • Graham James Fullwood

    My house is on a ridge 60 metres above the Trent valley where the proposed park would be. We are about 4 km downwind of the site - North East. Any fumes and particulates coming from the site will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • John Newsham

    Incineration cant be considered Green energy. 20th April 2021 Gov sets 'most ambitious climate change target' this isn't compatible with allowing plastic incineration as this is more carbon intensive... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • Lesley Barsley

    We live in the locality and would like to add support to the project, we have read all the objections and feel as long as we can be assured that the transport infrastructure will be adequate, the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • Michael Sharp

    Respect to infrastructure and increased traffic flows. concerns over fumes blowing over village due to height of chimney. being built close to site of flixbrough disaster.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 August 2022

  • Dr Jeremy Jolley

    The ‘Green Energy Park’ will essentially be a very large furnace, mainly purposed to burn plastics and other waste. The furnace will be sited in the village of Flixborough. This is a pretty and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 August 2022

  • Malcolm Plaskitt

    The transportation of hazardous, medical and corrosive waste pructs on Laerge Goods vehicles on such a scale is flying in the face of common sense. The County within which it is proposed to site this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 August 2022

  • Steve Duree

    Burning waste is by no means, a green energy project. Funds would be better used ensuring that consumer packaging is reduced and there is no need for incineration. Amcotts which is the other side of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 August 2022

  • Eamonn Igoe

    I am registering as a local resident who wishes to be kept Informed as to how the changes to the local environment Pre build and on completion of the build will effect me and my family

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2022

  • Kenneth Brocklesby

    I live close to the proposed development, and would like to be informed of all developments. I support the development if it is in the creation of jobs , development of the wildlife and improved road... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2022

  • Mr John Jarvis

    i live in the village

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 August 2022

  • Michael Giles

    I moved to the village 6 years ago as it was so quite, my mistake. Not only do I have to endure the noise from Rainham Steel, the speedway, winterton tip and several train you are now planning on more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 August 2022

  • Norman Turner

    As I understand it the intention is to store mixed waste on this site until it can be burnt. I’m objecting on the grounds the the waste is mostly of an unknown nature and will be decomposing on site.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 August 2022