North Lincolnshire Green Energy Park

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 50 of 94 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Gateley Hamer (Gateley Hamer) on behalf of Andrew Gravel t/a ADG Autotech (Andrew Gravel t/a ADG Autotech)

    Mr Gravel owns and occupies two units on the Flixborough Industrial Estate that will be lost to the scheme. Mr Gravel operates an established independent car repair garage from the units. A... Read more

  • United Kingdom Without Incineration Network (UKWIN) (United Kingdom Without Incineration Network (UKWIN))

    UKWIN objects to the proposed development. Claimed benefits are overstated, and potential adverse impacts are understated. The planning balance goes against the proposal, with associated adverse... Read more

  • Brian Close

    We have no need of this facility it is largely seen as the north being used as London’s rubbish dump. The technology has already failed in Holland where toxins were found in the human food chain. The... Read more

  • Carol Richardson

    I strongly believe this is wrong for the area. We regularly have the worst air quality of the country and this would only make matters worst. Even if the Green Park could keep emissions to a minimum... Read more

  • Diane Sigsworth

    I wish to keep abreast of developments as the proposal progresses.

  • James O

    I am very concerned about the new project, mainly because of the smell that will no doubt impact on myself and the surrounding area. It will also have an impact on the local environment. The traffic... Read more

  • Kim Golightly

    I'm concerned about,The energy recovery facility, hydrogen production and storage,ash treatment and concrete block manufacturing, the reinstatement of railway and creation of new railhead. Where will... Read more

  • Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust (Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust)

    We have already engaged with the developer pre-application and discussed various points. We will be seeking nature's recovery, Biodiversity Net Gain, that all impacts on known local, regional,... Read more

  • Ray Barker

    Safety and environmental concerns.

  • Bob Meldrum

    I am a resident of Burton upon Stather, a small village which sits approximately 2 miles north of the proposed site. The proposed site is at sea level and most of Burton upon Stather is 83m above sea... Read more

  • Canal & River Trust (Canal & River Trust)

    The Canal & River Trust are the charity who look after and bring to life 2000 miles of canals & rivers. Our waterways contribute to the health and wellbeing of local communities and economies,... Read more

  • David Hinchcliffe

    The development of the Park would severely impact the village of Amcotts which is directly across the river Trent from the site. We anticipate Massively increased noise pollution from the railway and... Read more

  • Gail Lockey

    As a resident of [redacted] I am very interested to find out about this park as it will have an impact on me living right next door to it. I am not opposed to it but would like to know in more detail... Read more

  • Graham James Fullwood

    My house is on a ridge 60 metres above the Trent valley where the proposed park would be. We are about 4 km downwind of the site - North East. Any fumes and particulates coming from the site will... Read more

  • John Newsham

    Incineration cant be considered Green energy. 20th April 2021 Gov sets 'most ambitious climate change target' this isn't compatible with allowing plastic incineration as this is more carbon intensive... Read more

  • Lesley Barsley

    We live in the locality and would like to add support to the project, we have read all the objections and feel as long as we can be assured that the transport infrastructure will be adequate, the... Read more

  • Michael Sharp

    Respect to infrastructure and increased traffic flows. concerns over fumes blowing over village due to height of chimney. being built close to site of flixbrough disaster.

  • Dr Jeremy Jolley

    The ‘Green Energy Park’ will essentially be a very large furnace, mainly purposed to burn plastics and other waste. The furnace will be sited in the village of Flixborough. This is a pretty and... Read more

  • Malcolm Plaskitt

    The transportation of hazardous, medical and corrosive waste pructs on Laerge Goods vehicles on such a scale is flying in the face of common sense. The County within which it is proposed to site this... Read more

  • Steve Duree

    Burning waste is by no means, a green energy project. Funds would be better used ensuring that consumer packaging is reduced and there is no need for incineration. Amcotts which is the other side of... Read more

  • Eamonn Igoe

    I am registering as a local resident who wishes to be kept Informed as to how the changes to the local environment Pre build and on completion of the build will effect me and my family

  • Kenneth Brocklesby

    I live close to the proposed development, and would like to be informed of all developments. I support the development if it is in the creation of jobs , development of the wildlife and improved road... Read more

  • Mr John Jarvis

    i live in the village

  • Michael Giles

    I moved to the village 6 years ago as it was so quite, my mistake. Not only do I have to endure the noise from Rainham Steel, the speedway, winterton tip and several train you are now planning on more... Read more

  • Norman Turner

    As I understand it the intention is to store mixed waste on this site until it can be burnt. I’m objecting on the grounds the the waste is mostly of an unknown nature and will be decomposing on site.... Read more

  • Stuart Trethewey

    Pollution issues including light, noise and smell. Lack of respect to the residents of Amcotts. Suitability of the site location. The shear scale of the site, is it in the National Interests to build... Read more

  • Tina Podmore

    Dragonby sits in a valley so noise can be loud, we currently have several trains running back and forth with what I understand is waste. The new park will create more trains which will increase noise,... Read more

  • Simon Nicholson

    This is the wrong site. It is on highly contaminated land which will be exposed due to the applicant wishing to excavate to accommodate a storage bunker to well over 10 metres. A site far more... Read more

  • Janet Peacock

    I live close by the proposed project and wish to collect information that may affect my lifestyle

  • Kevin John Bird

    definition of Green energy alternative sites over capacity Environmental considerations latest technology

  • Christine Nutt

    As a local resident I am concerned about the detrimental effect this project will have on the general well-being of those living in the surrounding area - noise, smell, increased traffic, not to... Read more

  • Alan Nigel Craddock

    In short: The applicant has failed to consult fully. The consultation pack, failed to reach even half the affected population The emerging North Lincolnshire Council "Local Plan" does not identify the... Read more

  • Anna Flewker

    Myself, my partner and baby live directly opposite the current plant. At present we experience some significant negative effects. These being as follows: 1) noise pollution. The wharf is naturally a... Read more

  • Michael Dillon

    - What will the impact on the surrounding environment be. - What will the impact be for surrounding noise and smell. - What will be increase in traffic; both rail, road and sea, in the area.

  • Amanda Farnham

    I oppose the application for the North Lincolnshire Green Energy Park. 1) 200m from the village of Amcotts 2) Noise 3) Vibration 4) Flies and odour 5) Light pollution 6) Visual impact 7) Traffic 8)... Read more

  • Andrew Farnham

    I oppose the application for the North Lincolnshire Green Energy Park. 1) 200m from the village of Amcotts 2) Noise 3) Vibration 4) Flies and odour 5) Light pollution 6) Visual impact 7) Traffic 8)... Read more

  • Appleby Parish Council (Appleby Parish Council)

    To provide a representation on behalf of the Councillors and residents of the parish of Appleby.

  • Katrina Young

    I would like to start with the obvious which is the previous disaster that has affected the village, Nypro, that disaster is more than any community should have to have dealt with, Nypro was enough... Read more

  • The Hickingbottom Family (The Hickingbottom Family )

    As residents of Amcotts we oppose the potential building of the U.K's largest Incinerator on Flixborough Wharf because of the following: Incinerators harm air quality, Incinerating plastic is harmful... Read more

  • Carl Young

    I am 100% against this plan. There are numerous reasons why this is not a practical location for this type of industry. These are: noise, odours, increased amount of flies, light pollution, visual... Read more

  • Patrick Leslie Nothard

    The village of Amcotts, located just across the river from the energy park, is already plagued by a large amount of flies/bugs attracted related to the current setup. I am concerned that the proposed... Read more

  • Paul Gracey

    What benefits there are? What extreme measures are being taken to eliminate smells completely. Zero tolerance What by products will there be and how will these be disposed of which again ensures zero... Read more

  • Rainham Steel Company Ltd (Rainham Steel Company Ltd)

    We are a tenant on one of the sites (14 acres) within the red line boundary and within 50 meters of the Flixborough port. The use the local ports (Flixborough and PD Ports) to import material into the... Read more

  • British Steel (British Steel) on behalf of British Steel Ltd (British Steel Ltd)

    British Steel have concerns that the development may have an impact on some of the pipes, water mains and cables in the area which service our site. For example there is a coke oven effluent line and... Read more

  • Burton upon Stather Parish Council (Burton upon Stather Parish Council)

    Burton upon Stather Parish Council objects to the proposed development and has the following concerns: 1. Few residents of Burton upon Stather (BUS) were provided with the public consultation pack in... Read more

  • KING Family

    My main objection to this planning application, Is reminding you that this site was historically used by a recycling company (SITA) and subsequently successfully shut down after local residents form... Read more

  • Residents Against INcinerators (RAIN) (Residents Against INcinerators (RAIN))

    RAIN (Residents Against INcinerators) is a group of residents from Burton upon Stather, Flixborough, Amcotts and Dragonby who object to the proposed development and give their following concerns: 1.... Read more

  • Tricia Murphy

    I am opposed to the building of this on the following grounds: CONSULTATION The original radius and nominees preventing the nearest village from participating and the misinformation regarding viewing... Read more

  • Anthony Buccieri

    Sick and tired of this local Council killing the local vista and in turn the environment with their government backed on trend ideas, which are forced upon the local area (Keadby, Amcotts,... Read more

  • Peacock and Smith Ltd (Peacock and Smith Ltd) on behalf of Gleeson Regeneration Ltd (Gleeson Regeneration Ltd )

    Dear Sir/Madam WRITTEN REPRESENTATION IN RESPONSE TO NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE GREEN ENERGY PARK CONSULTATION - PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE: EN010116 GLEESON REGENERATION LTD We act on behalf of our... Read more