Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The transportation of hazardous, medical and corrosive waste pructs on Laerge Goods vehicles on such a scale is flying in the face of common sense. The County within which it is proposed to site this...
Read more
-
Burning waste is by no means, a green energy project. Funds would be better used ensuring that consumer packaging is reduced and there is no need for incineration. Amcotts which is the other side of...
Read more
-
I am a resident of Burton upon Stather, a small village which sits approximately 2 miles north of the proposed site. The proposed site is at sea level and most of Burton upon Stather is 83m above sea...
Read more
-
The Canal & River Trust are the charity who look after and bring to life 2000 miles of canals & rivers. Our waterways contribute to the health and wellbeing of local communities and economies,...
Read more
-
The development of the Park would severely impact the village of Amcotts which is directly across the river Trent from the site. We anticipate Massively increased noise pollution from the railway and...
Read more
-
As a resident of [redacted] I am very interested to find out about this park as it will have an impact on me living right next door to it. I am not opposed to it but would like to know in more detail...
Read more
-
My house is on a ridge 60 metres above the Trent valley where the proposed park would be. We are about 4 km downwind of the site - North East. Any fumes and particulates coming from the site will...
Read more
-
Incineration cant be considered Green energy. 20th April 2021 Gov sets 'most ambitious climate change target' this isn't compatible with allowing plastic incineration as this is more carbon intensive...
Read more
-
We live in the locality and would like to add support to the project, we have read all the objections and feel as long as we can be assured that the transport infrastructure will be adequate, the...
Read more
-
Respect to infrastructure and increased traffic flows. concerns over fumes blowing over village due to height of chimney. being built close to site of flixbrough disaster.
-
We have no need of this facility it is largely seen as the north being used as London’s rubbish dump. The technology has already failed in Holland where toxins were found in the human food chain. The...
Read more
-
I strongly believe this is wrong for the area. We regularly have the worst air quality of the country and this would only make matters worst. Even if the Green Park could keep emissions to a minimum...
Read more
-
I wish to keep abreast of developments as the proposal progresses.
-
I am very concerned about the new project, mainly because of the smell that will no doubt impact on myself and the surrounding area. It will also have an impact on the local environment. The traffic...
Read more
-
I'm concerned about,The energy recovery facility, hydrogen production and storage,ash treatment and concrete block manufacturing, the reinstatement of railway and creation of new railhead. Where will...
Read more
-
We have already engaged with the developer pre-application and discussed various points. We will be seeking nature's recovery, Biodiversity Net Gain, that all impacts on known local, regional,...
Read more
-
Safety and environmental concerns.
-
Mr Gravel owns and occupies two units on the Flixborough Industrial Estate that will be lost to the scheme. Mr Gravel operates an established independent car repair garage from the units. A...
Read more
-
UKWIN objects to the proposed development. Claimed benefits are overstated, and potential adverse impacts are understated. The planning balance goes against the proposal, with associated adverse...
Read more