Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I wish to support the expansion of clean green economically sound energy
-
The Main issues that I wish to raise. The Phase 2 Turbines planned are very large, and will have a huge visual impact, thus likely to affect important "visitor" income , surely they should be located...
Read more
-
I object to the proposals. Impact on Kent Street Cowfold: I agree with the views expressed by CowfoldvRampion, our community action group. During the informal consultation and the first round...
Read more
-
I believe that the main concern is as to how much the wind farm will impact on our views, and whether this will be detrimental to the tourism of the area, particularly between Littlehampton & Bognor...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the project. The cable route will go through most of the fields on my farm. I have asked RWE on numerous occasions for copies of the surveys undertaken on my farm but have never...
Read more
-
The huge size of the generators The proximity of the wind farm to the shoreline - why not site it further off shore? The works- we could hear the windfarm off Worthing (Rampion 1?) being built; we are...
Read more
-
· For the amenity of neighbouring residential properties, the construction hours permitted for both the works on the underground cable route through the Parish from the Oakendene substation to the...
Read more
-
installing wind turbines only around 8km from the coast is not within Government Guide lines , being on the edge of the South Downs National Park they should be sited at a much greater distance from...
Read more
-
Opposition to proposed project: Failure to consult adequately with those who will be impacted by substation construction in Cowfold - no public meetings held in Cowfold during consultation. Inadequate...
Read more
-
The wind farm is too close to the shore and should be moved further out to sea or to another location. This will therefore be in an area of greater wind speed.
-
I do not believe this wind farm will be located in the best position as there is not enough wind power to support it. It will have a detrimental effect on the wild life in the area and the turbines...
Read more
-
Importance of supporting renewable energies in the region to limit climate change
-
The proposals for this wind farm are unacceptable and have not been consulted on fully or correctly by the applicant. The benefit of energy production in this form is still unproven without the...
Read more
-
The proposed turbines are too large and too close to shore. The seascape will be destroyed the damage to the sea bed unnecessary for the kelp farm which is repairing itself. The amount of energy that...
Read more
-
The near shore trawler ban has allowed the Sussex Kelp Forest Project to start to regenerate. Climping Beach residents are talking to research organisations to see if Climping Beach would be a good...
Read more
-
1. The cost of offshore wind generated electricity is excessive compared with other energy sources and we, the end users, will have to pay for it over many years to come. 2. This has all occured...
Read more
-
Representation from Ancleggan Limited in response to a notice served on it pursuant to Section 56 of the Planning Act 2009 on behalf of Rampion 2 Offshore Windfarm (the “Rampion Development”). 1....
Read more
-
I am concerned about the size and location of the turbines. Further out to sea would appear to yield a better efficiency compared to the current proposal.
-
Relevant Representation – Rampion 2 Offshore Windfarm Project This relevant representation is submitted on behalf of Southern Water Services Limited (“SWS”). SWS is the appointed water and sewerage...
Read more
-
- The proposed site is not a suitable location - Disruption to the local area, mainly traffic lights for potentially six years on the A272 will make local day to day life very difficult indeed, for...
Read more
-
The wind farm as a whole, will be up to 196km2,it will affect not only marine life, the views on the sea disturbed by a bright reflective fence 325m tall across the Sussex Bay. It will affect the...
Read more
-
We are concerned about the adverse effects the proposed plans will have on the environment and the detrimental impact on the coastline & the AONB viewed from the South Downs National Park
-
The impact of these 325 m high structures will be detrimental to the Seaside Tourist Industry of West Sussex. The only way they can be justified is to comply with Government Guidelines and comply with...
Read more
-
• At a distance of only 8 miles from shore, the Rampion 2 site contravenes the OESEA guidelines that offshore windturbines should be at least 25 miles from a National Park ( in this instance the South...
Read more
-
I am disappointed to read that rampion2 is moving forwards as it goes directly agsinst OLSEA2 government guidelines ie it is not offshore. This, coupled, with the Rampion 1 capacity of 2.25% leads me...
Read more