Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 276 to 300 of 1222 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Vanessa MacKinnon

    The size of the development is far too large and will have a huge visual impact on the area. The construction traffic will bring lots of noise, dust and pollution to the area. The land is better used... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 March 2023

  • Alan Charles Shelbourn

    Mallard Pass Solar Farm is in the wrong location and it will destroy forever a vast area of high-grade agricultural land. The old RAF base at Woolfox Lodge would surely be a far better location for a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Andrea mcquaid

    I am very concerned about losing land for arable and livestock farming to great swathes of metal. The impact on wildlife too is a real worry, how are hawks and owls meant to find their food when the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Anna Haines

    I wish to register my strong opposition to the proposed Mallard Pass Solar Farm development for the following reasons: 1. The negative impact on the local natural environment and biodiversity in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Barry Douglas Holt

    I object to the Mallard Pass Solar Project being approved because of the following: Loss of valuable prime farmland at a time when we need to produce more food not less. Contrary to Government policy.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Beverley Haydon

    Whilst I agree with solar panels this is not the place to put them. Using swathes of agricultural land when farmers are struggling to make ends meet as it is. Food shortages will be even more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Calvan Sydney Player

    1.Mallard Pass would be the largest Solar Plant in the UK to date. Much greater consideration is required to assess the impact this project might have. 2.Compulsory acquisition rights were not made... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Chloe Allport

    I am strongly opposed to the Mallard Pass Solar Farm on agricultural land either side of the East Coast Main Line near Essendine on 2,105 acres of land – green land, farming land. I do not accept that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Chrissie Muir

    I strongly object to the proposed development on the grounds of environmental, economic and visual factors. I do not believe that the figures stated by Mallard Pass are anywhere near as beneficial as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Christine Spray

    Why isn't the government insisting all new builds should have solar panelling on roofs, be it commercial or residential. We need land to grow food.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Daniel Speed

    I support the requirement for a solar farm at Mallard pass. However the current peovision of this major infrastructure project being owned by a private company and not the UK government is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • David Busfield

    I’m concerned about the impact on this small rural community from industrialised energy on a grand scale. Is there appropriate consideration for the infrastructure? Community? Environment and ecology?

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • David Maurice Walker

    It's in the wrong place extending over valuable food growing land and this food production must take precedence over providing power that is not available 24 hours a day. I have solar panels on my... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • David Roberts

    The size of the development is too big for the site proposed and the surrounding area. Whilst I agree with renewable energy, this will be the largest solar plant in the UK (over 8 times larger than... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Deborah Bircham

    Further to the Mallard Pass Development and the second round of consultation, I would like to add my feedback to the amended proposals. I still have a number of concerns about this development. •... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Derek Jones

    Loss of agricultural land, visual and noise impacts are unacceptable. Why do the cables have to run through Essendine, surely through farmland and under the railway is a better option, or would the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Derek Van Osten Lygo

    I object to solar panels being sited on productive agricultural land, being so close to conservation villages, with regard to increased flooding risk, particularly at Greatford, the degradation of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Dr Peter John Pitt White

    I strongly oppose the large-scale industrialization of prime agricultural land, particularly as recent events have clearly demonstrated that food security is even more vital than energy supply... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Dr. Lindsey Gove

    I believe that a scheme such as this is essential to our ability to green energy production and mitigate climate change. Whilst I recognise that it might not be ideal to have such a project in one's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • ELIZABETH ELLEN KIDD

    Detrimental to the immediate environment, loss of open spaces, intrusive to all neighbouring villages, excessive traffic and noise, too big not needed this size, individual properties will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Fiona Mary Veronica Smith

    The size of the proposed scheme concerns me as the land is mainly agricultural and the loss of that would affect the local and wider community. The long term effects of such a huge project are not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Frances Lygo

    I am profoundly concerned with Mallard Pass and their proposed industrial development of a vast solar park on the shoulders of historic Stamford and the rural villages surrounding it for the following... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Francoise Vickers

    Impact on infrastructure

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Frank Weston

    No consent to Mallard Pass solar farm! Disinformation regarding solar power! Expensive, not eco friendly. Furthermore geo-engineering blocks out the suns energy approximately 30%. Theft of farmland,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023

  • Geoffrey Brazier

    .Cleve Hill Solar Park has been approved for construction and expects to produce 350MW on 890 acres of reclaimed marshland. Mallard Pass Solar Farm expects to produce 350MW on a variety of sites... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 28 February 2023