Filter
Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 276 to 300 of 1223 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • John Bavister

    This site will never become carbon neutral, as it is impossible to generate the amount of electricity claimed. To focus on the real finite generation of Carbon released by the use of PVs and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 January 2023

  • Margot Walford

    I would prefer to see solar farms on brown field sites, not farm land.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 January 2023

  • Mary Parry

    Spoiling good agriculture land and wildlife.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 January 2023

  • Peter John Martindale

    I have lived in Castle Bytham for 47 years and am very familiar with the area currently being considered for the development of the Mallard Pass solar farm. I am in favour of the development as it has... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 January 2023

  • Robert Beaver

    Solar panels should be on roofs of houses ,warehouses Factories & Brownfield sites not on food producing land And spoiling green countryside. Panels going on beautiful countryside and agriculture Land... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 January 2023

  • Stella Morgan

    Apart from the devastation of the countryside, the loss of arable land, at a time when production needs to increase rather than the opposite, is something that must be avoided.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 January 2023

  • Douglas Davidson Anderson

    The size of the site is far larger than any other proposed or operating in the UK. It will turn a rural landscape with good quality agricultural land into an industrial scar severely impacting on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 January 2023

  • Jill Salkeld

    The proposed solar farm is too close to housing and busy roads. It could be moved further away from these. There will be two years of noise, light pollution, disruption and damage for all those living... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 January 2023

  • Kelham Cooke

    - 2 years of noise, light pollution, disruption and damage across 2,105 acre site and surrounding area. - Cabling to new sub-station may now run through Essendine on A6121 with Mallard Pass seeking... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 January 2023

  • Kyla Mulvaney

    Concerns about environmental, agricultural and economic implications about this project. It is not in the best interests for Lincolnshire and the U.K. reduction of the size will only diminish the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 January 2023

  • Andrew Ebdon

    My over-riding concern about this project is the amount of 'Best and Most Versatile' agricultural land that will be given up to solar panels. While, nationally, we do need to have energy security, we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • Errietta Panagiotopoulos

    In my opinion solar farms are not a good solution to our clean energy needs. There are 27 million households in the UK and many of these could have rooftop solar, not to mention the many often very... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • Margaret Elizabeth Anderson

    The proposed site is huge, far larger than any others in the UK and larger than Windel Energy and Canadian Solar have completed so far. The farm would be visible from miles around and will be a major... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • Peter Garry Smith

    I wish to object to the proposal because :- - it is inappropriate use of agricultural land - it is visually intrusive and hideously ugly - the scale is unsuitable and detrimental to the area in many... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • Rosemary Ann David

    Mallard Pass Solar Farm, is vast. A large percentage of it is to be built on high grade agricultural land and it will have a detrimental effect on all forms of wild life and the natural environment.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • Rupert Gibson

    I object to this project. It is too large, it will destroy a huge area of countryside and farmland. Solar panels on buildings not fields.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • Susan Bryars

    The size of the project is very worrying. Whilst I appreciate that the location is advantages in terms of access to the grid, to have split this into a number of smaller projects with similar... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • The residents of 46, High Street, Carlby (The residents of 46, High Street, Carlby)

    These are our main concerns: •The sheer scale of this project • The land is good farming land •The fact that villages and small communities will be surrounded by acres of solar panels •The impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • William Michael Halford

    In my opinion solar farms are not a good solution to our clean energy needs. There are 27 million households in the UK and many of these could have rooftop solar, not to mention the many often very... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • A Mitchell

    In no order at this point: Sheer Scale Land use….AGRICULTURE not solar Visual impact combined with Mental Health transferring to physical health of the people affected by this. Ecology and Wildlife... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Alexandra Ellis

    I am concerned about the use of agricultural land when there are numerous alternatives eg roof slopes of large industrial buildings. The prospect of compulsory acquisitions in Essendine is not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Benjamin Tony Evans

    I oppose the mallard pass solar farm because of the sheer size of the development in the chosen location. It will be a great loss of beautiful countryside, there are far more suitable areas for this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Darren Gray

    This will have a significant impact on the future use of high grade arable and grazing land, by removing it from use. Also, the resultant impact on wildlife is very much a concern. Other than during... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • David John Gladstone Wilby

    To big, too many disadvantages would ensue for a small rural community

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Eric Tindall

    COVERING OUR AGRICULTURAL LAND WITH SOLAR PANELS IS A MISTAKE WHEN SO MANY INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ACROSS THE UNITED KINGDOM HAVE VACANT ROOF SPACE THAT WOULD EASILY BE FITTED WITH SOLAR PANELS TO DO THE... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023