Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
PHE considers that the public health impacts likely to arise from the impact of the development on air, land and water have been adequately considered in the related sections of the...
Read more
-
1. Any major disturbance of any part of an historic landscape is unacceptable.
2. Land could be resumed somewhere "over the hills and far away" to build a by-pass road, so...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the destruction of important archaeological information and finds associated with the area, and the unrepairable damage to the site which has World Heritage Status. Also rare bird...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme will cause irreparable harm to the WHS and destroy its archaeology. No sane person can consider this to be acceptable.
-
It's ridiculous to spend so much money on a tunnel, yes the traffic is terrible but there has to be less costly options on the table. I understand it is going to be. very difficult to come up with a...
Read more
-
Mr Robert Turner of Manor Farm, Winterbourne Stoke.
DCO Registration of Interested Parties.
I wish to make full written and oral representations on many aspects of the scheme (an outline of...
Read more
-
I object to a dual carriageway running beside Stonehenge as I feel it would destroy the significance of the historical value of the site.
-
Dear sir/madam,
Please keep Stonehenge intact as it is now. An expressway could damage the site because of the vibrations of constructing it and from the cars especially the heavy ones.. And the view...
Read more
-
I object to the plans for a main road very close to Stonehenge because, in digging the foundations of that road, irreparable damage will be done to any archaeological remains which are below the...
Read more
-
We - Astronumerical Druid Order ADO and Sacred Grove Western Isles SGWI, OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application.
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National...
Read more
-
I strongly feel that the proposals relating to the above scheme are wholly inappropriate for the landscape through which the road will be cutting. Whilst the scheme threatens to irreparably damage the...
Read more
-
It will irreparably damage the archeology of the World Heritage Site
-
I am concerned about the proposal as I think it will destroy this World Heritage Site. It is irreplaceable and is still giving archaeologists information. I also understand that rare birds will be...
Read more
-
I am against the proposed new highway as I believe it will be very damaging to this extremely important site and once spoilt it will be spoilt forever.
UNESCO advisers are quite rightly against this...
Read more
-
1) The build is environmentally sound in relation to the river Till.
2) The realigned cross roads at Rollestone are constructed and open before any other works commence – reason to minimise on the...
Read more
-
The plan to turn the A303 into a under ground dual carriageway that runs close to the Stonehenge site has many flaws. It is ridiculously expensive and cannot give value for money in terms of a return...
Read more
-
I'm very concerned that this tunnel, as proposed, could damage this World Heritage Site and disturb the land.
It's just to risky!
There must be a better way to improve traffic flow.
-
I am very concerned about the proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge because I feel that the construction of such a dual carriageway and tunnel will do irreversible damage to the landscape of the area,...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the loss of one of our most precious cultural assets and its view when I travel along the A303. The stones are the only ones in the world and irreparable damage to the WHS, and its...
Read more
-
Do not do this... Stonehenge was built for a purpose. In alignment with planets and stars also tied to energies within the earth. This place is sacred. Would you bury underneath a cathedral? The...
Read more
-
CPRE Wiltshire Branch objects to the A303 Preferred Route and proposed alterations as an individual charity and as a supporter of the Stonehenge Alliance of NGOs. Our objections, supported by CPRE...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is one of the worlds most recognisable and iconic heritage sites and its setting and landscape are integral to its appreciation. The proposed development would severely impact its setting...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel roadworks poses a significant threat to the precious cultural heritage of the area and will be detrimental to the aesthetic, cultural and historical values found in the area. I am...
Read more
-
I am very concerned to hear about the proposed expressway on Stonehenge. IT is very disrespectful to the UNESCO international advisors and to thousands of pagans across the country, which place great...
Read more
-
A tunnel is a terrible idea. Not only could you be unwittingly destroying archeological treasures; you would be denying the majority of people who are not rich the iconic sight of the stones in their...
Read more
-
The A303/A30/A358 Improvement Partnership strongly supports the Department for Transport’s ongoing commitment to improving this vital strategic corridor between London and the South West. We welcome...
Read more
-
The area around Stonehenge is an EXTREMELY important World Heritage Site and as such should not be disturbed for any reason.
I personally recommend that this application should be rejected.
-
I don't believe the disruption to the Heritage site and the local roads and villages when the motorists try to find alternative routes would be worth the expense. I think it would be as ridiculous as...
Read more
-
I am concerned about permanent damage to this World Heritage site and the lack of alternative plans that would not cause damage.
Loss of view from the road of Stonehenge monument and people having...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
The planned engineering works would scar the Stonehenge landscape for ever. There would be extensive tunnel cuttings into the chalk for four lanes of tarmac, and massive highway interchanges through...
Read more
-
Concern over the future of the World Heritage Site
-
Hello,
The statements below, to my mind, have not been fully thought out.
• Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
We're are constantly developing new ways to...
Read more
-
I am independent Chair of the Partnership Panel which oversees the management of the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site. I wish to provide evidence of the risks , benefits and opportunities...
Read more
-
We cannot allow anything to damage our cultural pastudies. Once gone it can not be recreated.
-
As someone who grew up in the area and whose family have been documented in the area as far back as the 16th century, likely earlier, I wish to register my objections to the DCO planning application...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
My representation is made on the following points:
- Concerns that permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
- UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in...
Read more
-
Such a historic UK site should not be interfered with. Other routes surely can be created.
-
UNESCO says no. Stone Curlews say no. The archeology says no. Therefore I am saying no. The only tunnel that should be considered is much longer and you won't pay for it. I cannot believe that there...
Read more
-
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I wonder how the UK government treats his World Heritage. Stonehenge needs to be protected for the future generation. A massive traffic around the site will destroy...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about damage to Blick Mead which offers a unique opportunity to study the lives of our Mesolithic forbears. It is a site which is rich in finds and is challenging our ideas about...
Read more
-
I am concerned that this ancient and Sacred World Heritage Site will suffer permanent damage.
The sight of this unique stone structure from the road is breathtaking and it is wrong that it should...
Read more
-
My concern is that this would cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting and there are concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
The...
Read more
-
Briefly, the scheme desecrates a UNESCO world heritage site and risk causing irreversible damage to other late mesolithic remains in the area. It is likely that such a scheme would have an adverse...
Read more
-
I have commented throughout the consultation process that the tunnel approach walls should consist of soil filled stacking planters as used extensively in Germany and France. These would soften the...
Read more
-
I firmly believe that Stonehenge is a unique and paramauntly important heritage site for preservation if which we are jointly responsible to the generations that come after us both in this country and...
Read more
-
The proposed highway may cause damage to this World Heritage Site and would certainly increase noise there. They should both be avoided.
-
Our world heritage site should not be compromised in any way. It’s setting and environment are part of what makes it so stunning. UNESCO advisors are against this scheme. Permanent damage to nearby...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed dual carriageway will damage the WHS irreparably. It will involve tunnelling into the ancient monument's surroundings, which MUST contain many artefacts which have...
Read more
-
“Couldn't find the freeway, had to take a backstreet called the M5.”
US Tourist explaining why they had arrived late for dinner in the Waldorf Salad episode of the classic comedy series Fawlty...
Read more
-
A waste of money, siphoning off a national asset, denying a free view for the public
-
I wish to oppose the application on the following grounds:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its...
Read more
-
Brian Edwards, Visiting Research Fellow, The Regional History Centre, University of the West of England, Bristol.
Deputy representative of the Avebury and Stonehenge Archaeological and Historical...
Read more
-
• UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form and I would agree with them.
-
I am concerned that the excavations for this project will irretrievably damage this UNESCO world heritage site. There have already been reports that the initial groundwork has had an effect and I do...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
There are many reasons why the tunnel should not be allowed to proceed inc the following in no order of importance or priority
1 Current cost is bound to escalate which cannot be justified in present...
Read more
-
I am registering as an objector to the current proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge.
The NNNPS section 5.129 requires that decision makers take into account "the particular nature of the...
Read more
-
lack of respect and protection for a sacred landscape
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international...
Read more
-
The A303 at Stonehenge is promoted as being part of a programme of improvements to unlock benefits for the South West economy, local communities and the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS). However,...
Read more
-
As a British citizen following the ancient religious ways of my Ancestors. I frequently use the areas commonly known as Stonehenge and Avebury circle for my religeous ceremonies (it is a place where I...
Read more
-
Dear Sir or Madam, I have registered concerning Stonehenge Heritage Landscape. The reason why is simply because, I actually protest against the Architecture construction plan to go ahead. To be frank...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site. UNESCO's advisers have stated that the planned scheme should not go ahead, and no acceptable plans have been made. Blick Mead Mesolithic site would be damaged,...
Read more
-
I wish to object to this proposal in the strongest possible terms. The dual carriageway would do irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site which UNESCO describes as "without parallel" and its...
Read more
-
1) I object to this Proposal on the grounds of the inevitable major disturbance, probable irreversible damage & possible destruction to an ancient & irreplaceable monument that the proposal will...
Read more
-
Stone Henge is an extremely important national heritage site that should be preserved and not compromised in any way. It belongs to the people of Great Britain and the area should not be interfered...
Read more
-
I believe that this world heritage site would be ruined...that endangered species would be lost.There are alternatives that have not been heard.
-
The plan will damage archaeology, as yet undiscovered above and below ground.
It will reduce opportunities for viewing Stonehenge from a distance, such as that from the present A303.
It will entail...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that such major construction is proposed for this work heritage site. The economic case is flawed: the problem very likely overstated and the case put forward fails to allow for...
Read more
-
destruction to historic sites of national and international importance
more and faster traffic
knock on effects to lead to ever more wider and higher capacity roads on this route and feeder roads...
Read more
-
I and my family have visited Stonehenge many times since I was a boy living in Dorset some 60 years ago, so I have a personal interest in trying to improve the local area to achieve a better...
Read more
-
My representation will cover the following issues:
- Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
- UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
UNESCO does not approve of the current scheme, this alone should be a huge red flag against the scheme as it stands.
The site is unique and only if the archaeology is preserved can it be subject to...
Read more
-
I am very concerned at the risk of irreparable harm being done to a unique archaeological site.
-
UNESCO object to this scheme and other options have not been adequately explored or represented.
-
This is a World Heritage Site and it is also of great historical, cultural and emotional significance to all British citizens. Unfortunately this scheme is exclusive in nature, effectively putting...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
I am a concerned individual, and frequent user of the A303. I don't believe these works are justifiable to save a few minute's jorney time. I am concerned about permanent damage to the World Heritage...
Read more
-
I do not think that Highways England should persist in its idea to put a large duel carriage way in place which will negatively impact on the UNESCO / Stonehenge World Heritage Site.
I have...
Read more
-
The Council for British Archaeology has long maintained an interest in the protection, conservation, management and public understanding of the Stonehenge & Avebury World Heritage Site (WHS).
We...
Read more
-
1 . Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a "landscape without parallel", particularly in regard to the western section between the cut and Longbarrow...
Read more
-
CPRE SW represents the seven county branches in the South West of England and thousands of individual CPRE members. These comments add to and reiterate the concerns/objections already stated in our...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
My reason for completing this form include:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form....
Read more
-
1 - there is no clear evidence road congestion will be improved
2 - there is too much focus on 'bronze age henge' and not enough planning for mitigation of impacts on multiperiod landscape and...
Read more
-
No permanent plans to put through anything that could damage the site any further. It' had historic and ancient burial ground and should not be distributed in any way that could damage it and destroy...
Read more
-
The WHS is of global significance and much of the surrounding land has lain undisturbed and without proper academic archaeological investigation. The merits of a poorly located road build out are...
Read more
-
My main complaint is that this scheme in its current form irreparably damage the Stonehenge landscape for thousands of years to come and destroy fragile archaeology there needs to be preserved for...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the plans for the A303 near Stonehenge will, if they are approved, cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting and concerned about damage to...
Read more
-
Driving a road through this area would lead to a loss of knowledge and area which would be a catostrophe.
-
This is an OBJECTION to the scheme for a number of reasons but principally the irreparable damage this will cause to the archaeology and site setting including Blick Mead Mesolithic Site. The...
Read more
-
I am concerned if it is the case that the decision to proceed with this work is being taken without approval from UNESCO. Since one stated objective for the work is to restore the World Heritage Site...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is probably the most recognisable, iconic and well-regarded prehistoric site in the world. To construct a tunnel under it would both threaten o damage it, from the construction work itself,...
Read more
-
If the application for the dual carriage way is allowed to go ahead it will result in .Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, Stonehenge both in terms of its archaeology and setting.
....
Read more
-
I am seriously concerned about permanent damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
I am also worried about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
UNESCO's...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site...
Read more
-
These are all of my concerns:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact that the proposed works will have on the environment in an area of outstanding natural beauty
I believe that it is wrong to deprive people a free view of such an...
Read more
-
This road would mean irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more