Filter

A303 Stonehenge

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 826 to 850 of 2370 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Martin Gem

    The new road not impact on the World Heritage Site in any way.

  • Matthew Sutcliffe

    I am objecting to your plans for the A303 where it passes Stonehenge. I have often enjoyed the view whilst driving past and feel it should remain possible to see these stones from a distance for free.... Read more

  • Mollie Semple

    Stonehenge is an important historical, spiritual and ancient site. We are losing so much of our heritage in the name of so called 'progress' and enough is enough!

  • Mr. Duncan Noble

    In my view the proposed scheme will irreparably damage not just the area presently designated as a World Heritage Site, but the wider environment that is part of the essential context of the... Read more

  • Mrs Iris Holden

    I am concerned about the plans to isolate Stonehenge from the A303. The view of Stonehenge from the A303 is a symbol of permanence which, in my view, gives reassurance and pleasure to countless... Read more

  • Mrs Lindsay Cutts

    I was saddened to hear of the habitat disturbance at Blickmead recently and really cannot understand why certain parties still intend to carry on with detrimental work in the area. Having grown up... Read more

  • Ms Catharine M Newman

    Stonehenge is unique......if the archaeology is damaged irreparably we lose our heritage and our deeper understanding of our ancient ancestors. It will be a loss for the world and deprive future... Read more

  • Ms Ros Smith

    I am very unhappy about the application for changes to the Stonehenge roadways, for a number of reasons: - I believe that this will destroy areas of this important achaeological setting in ways... Read more

  • Pauline Moran

    A classic example of knowing the costs of everything (building a cheaper by-pass) and the value of nothing (StoneHenge) If this goes ahead...History will not look kindly on you. Would love to... Read more

  • QinetiQ Group Plc (QinetiQ Group Plc)

    My organisation has a number of employees (c1000) who use the A303 on a daily basis to access the Boscombe Down Airfield site and any service diversion or works to the A303 will affect the travel... Read more

  • Regina De Giovanni

    Unesco has recommended that this work should not proceed. Please stop. Thank you

  • Robert Griffin

    These proposals will irretrevably damage the archaeology of the sites either by design or neglect. There have already been reports of damage to the archaeology of the Stonehenge... Read more

  • Susan Hopkinson

    The unique architectural heritage of this area needs to be protected and undisturbed for future generations. There would be significant damage if this scheme were allowed to go ahead. I am also... Read more

  • Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society (Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society)

    ABOUT The Society was founded in 1853 to “educate the public by promoting, fostering interest in, exploration, research and publication on the archaeology, art, history and natural history of... Read more

  • Amesbury Town Council (Amesbury Town Council)

    Please see attached

  • Dawn Watson

    I strongly disagree with any further desecration of the World Heritage site. Once you destroy this, it will never be able to be recovered. This does not just impact the current generations but also... Read more

  • Gemma Ellis

    I favour minimal intrusion into Stonehenge and the area around it. I favour cutting back on existing intrusions like the road running close by that was removed recently. For the A303 my view is that... Read more

  • Geoffrey Allan

    The current plans are likely to damage this World Heritage Site. UNESCO do not support the plans in their present form. THe unique character of the site and its surrounding area should be protected... Read more

  • James Higgs

    PROW: The proposals within the application unjustly affect existing public rights of way and fail to make adequate provision for their conservation. This is contrary to both the recommendations... Read more

  • Kate Prendergast

    I am an academic archaeologist by training. My D.Phil research, undertaken at the University of Oxford, focused on evidence for astronomy in the ancient societies of the British Isles. Stonehenge was... Read more

  • Leon Maschner

    The Western tunnel entrance should be moved further westwards making the tunnel longer, or a covering put over the A303 where it is down in the cutting creating a green tunnel. I would like there to... Read more

  • Lynn Evans

    The strange vibrations that are present at this site is not easily understood by our modern? view, we have yet to catch up with the ancient mind that is much more advanced than we the ignorant give... Read more

  • Lynn Lovell

    The land around Stonehenge is sacred land. Stonehenge was a central meeting place for the British tribes. Leylines run from here all over our blessed country. We are constantly uncovering new... Read more

  • Mrs Lindy Ayubi

    This scheme will cause Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. Points that are of huge relevance and seem not to have been... Read more

  • NATS LTD (NATS LTD)

    NATS anticipates no impact from the proposal and has no comments to make. Regards S. Rossi NATS Safeguarding Office