Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am concerned about the damage that will inevitably be caused to this ancient World Heritage site, and I believe it is far more important to preserve it, than to continue to prioritize road building...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel would harm the significance of the world heritage site and I wish to object to the proposal for a tunnel scheme.
-
The proposed plans for the tunnel at Stonehenge are utterly ridiculous and I cannot comprehend how anyone can consider them in any way serious or sensible.
UNESCO has awarded the area World...
Read more
-
I have been visiting Stone Henge since the mid 1970s, first as a child and then as an adult. I find it hard to understand why anyone would think a massive dual carriageway is necessary at a time when...
Read more
-
Dear Sir ,
I wish to object to the proposed plan re the Stonehenge by-pass for the following reasons:
1) It will disturb some of our country's most ancient pre-historic sites .
2) ...
Read more
-
I cannot but agree with Stonehenge Alliance that the current scheme will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and...
Read more
-
I am mindful of the fact that the Stonehenge WHS has been regarded as both sacred and enigmatic for upwards of 6000 years. To me this is what "Outstanding Universal Value" means.
It would be...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned about the potential for damage to such an important and unique historical site in mainland England. This site is important for historical, scientific, anthropological reasons and...
Read more
-
I would like to object to the proposed A303 Expressway. This would be an absolute tragedy and would damage irrevocably a UNESCO world heritage site, it's archaeology and it's natural setting....
Read more
-
We are submitting more detailed representations (Via email: Our ref A303Stonehenge_RReps_11.01.19) to assist your understanding of the outstanding information requirements and issues of concern that...
Read more
-
It seems absurd to me that this proposal could in any way provide a solution to rat running or the bottleneck frequently seen on this section of the A303. Nor do I see any evidence or proof in the...
Read more
-
I consider it will bring Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. This upsets me and many others.
ncreased noise from more and faster trafficmakes no sense and the...
Read more
-
"We feel the Western portal is too close to the ancient burial mounds and the Eastern too close to 'Blickmead' Archaeological site, and that there are issues with light pollution to the west and water...
Read more
-
Dear Sir / Madam
With regard to the current proposition for the tunnel under Stonehenge, on the A303, I would like to raise my objections to this proposal, echoing the concern raised by ICOMOS-UK...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that work is planned for a road tunnel near Stonehenge, an irreplaceable and priceless site of international value, going against UNESCO advice and without sufficient consideration...
Read more
-
The plan as it stands is poorly thought through and appears to take little cognizance of the historic and pre-historic importance of the wider site. The proposal appears to have been thought up giving...
Read more
-
Once this many-layered landscape has been re-purposed and redesigned purely for the convenience of the moment, it will to all effect have been destroyed. The layers of history, the fragile monuments,...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage site. The purpose and mystery surrounding these stones eludes and fascinates us after all this time.
At present, the 303 passes a respectable distance from these...
Read more
-
The congested road next to Stonehenge needs to be moved but the proposed tunnel is too short, in the wrong place and on the cheap. It will damage archaeological sites and affect aquifers.
This...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
From what I understand you plan to build a tunnel under our most well known pagan site. Apart from the the normal environmental and destructive arguments against this, I strongly discourage you as a...
Read more
-
I am against the Expressway, as it would permanently damage the World Heritage Site. Road-building is not the answer to problems associated with the area.
-
I strongly object to the desecration and destruction of such a valuable Mesolithic treasure, and the flagrant disregard of UNESCO opinion. This expensive destruction of our natural heritage must be...
Read more
-
Allowing anything at all which will potentialy damage or detract from this site is horrendous .The site needs protecting for future generation's
-
Under the terms of the Inscription for the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site, the Associated Monuments and the settings of all of these, whether above or below ground are regarded as being...
Read more