Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 351 to 375 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Luddesdown Parish Council (Luddesdown Parish Council)

    Luddesdown Parish Council has participated in all the many consultations run on this project and have concerns that have not been addressed in the consultation materials. Below is a summary of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 5 February 2023

  • David Robert Plant

    My concerns are over the effect on the roads at the Orsett Cock roundabout and the A13/A1014 roundabout. Also the loss of green belt land through Thurrock. It also appears the new road will not solve... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2023

  • Essex Area Ramblers (Essex Area Ramblers)

    The Essex Area Ramblers provided a response in September 2021 and in summary is: We are generally content that the replacement PRoWs are adequate in principle, but as there are no detailed plans at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2023

  • Mark Teeton

    I am interested in assessing the scheme in the following areas; Overall project programme feasibility and cost compared to similar projects around the world. As a tax payer, I want an honest... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2023

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)

    APPLICATION BY NATIONAL HIGHWAYS LIMITED FOR AN ORDER GRANTING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT FOR THE LOWER THAMES CROSSING Planning Inspectorate Reference Number: TR010032 Section 56 Planning Act 2008: Relevant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2023

  • Bluewater (Landsec) (Bluewater (Landsec))

    On behalf of Bluewater Shopping Centre, which is owned and managed by Landsec, I would like to make the following representations in support for the Lower Thames Crossing. To provide some context,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Forestry Commission (Forestry Commission)

    We wish to Register as an “Interested party” The Forestry Commission is a Statutory Party where NSIP applications are likely to affect the protection or expansion of forests and woodlands which we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Joanna Haigh

    The UK has a legal obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Road transport is now the economic sector which contributes most to these and action needs to be taken on reducing it. The Lower... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Kate Soper

    The plans for the LTC fly in the face of UK commitments on climate change and the reduction of carbon emissions. They are estimated to add 6.6 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent. They are opposed by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Kerstin Oloff

    as a researcher of environment and society, I am opposed to another new road project – the Lower Thames Crossing (LTC), a proposed six-lane, 22-kilometre motorway with a tunnel under the Thames near... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Peter Somerville

    The main points that I would like to make are: The Lower Thames Crossing will result in increased travel by road when what is needed now and in the future is a modal shift away from private vehicle... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Robin Beard

    While I am generally in favour of the Lower Thames Crossing, I do have some major reservations about the design that Highways England have submitted to you... because I think that the selected route... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Canterbury City Council (Canterbury City Council)

    We received Notice (under section 56 of the Planning Act 2008) that the above DCO application has now been accepted by the Planning Inspectorate This letter contains the representations of Canterbury... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • Graham Pike

    I am very pleased with the consultation materials provided and the clarity on the project itself.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • James Harkins

    This scheme is not the best available in that being road based will create too much NEE It should be rail based with no pollution at the point of use

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • Mrs Fay Plumb

    I am convinced that it will not provide value for money and that Ministers are being mislead as the figures they will be presented with are two years out of date. It is an ill-conceived scheme... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • Stephen Metcalfe

    As Member of Parliament for South Basildon and East Thurrock I wish to make representations in person on a number of issues of great concern to my constituents, including but not limited to: Ability... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • Fraser Massey

    Concern and opposition to the Lower Thames Crossing for some of the following reasons:- Cost of the project Long running timescale of the project Impact on local health Impact on air quaility Impact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Gary Flowers

    Impact on local roads and lanes with movement of construction vehicles. Also the impact on local housing prices.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Irene Hamilton

    There is no evidence that this link road will have any benefits for this area. I live in South Ockendon and the impact this will have on the environment is criminal! The air pollution, the destruction... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Kent Countryside Access Forum (Kent Countryside Access Forum)

    The Kent Countryside Access Forum is a statutory body which advises Councils and other organisations on matters concerning Public Rights of Way (PRoW) and Green Spaces. The Forum represents the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Simon Barber

    I am opposing the Lower Thames River Crossing on the following grounds and the project would: -Increase traffic growth leading to more CO2 emissions, plus construction emissions -Not solve Dartford... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Dave Walker

    I'm opposing the proposed new Thames Crossing. I don't believe it will solve the current problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing, and will have various negative impacts: There's no provision... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2023

  • James Wiggins

    the provision of also upgrading junction 3 on the M2 that connects to the A229 for access for coast bound traffic onto the M20 for Folkstone & Dover Tunnel & Ferry ports. At Peak times this is already... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2023

  • Keith Tomlins

    I am wishing to represent the interests of cyclists and other users of sustainable low carbon transport. Currently, the plans seem to only allow users of vehicles (cars, lorries etc) to use the lower... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2023