Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 351 to 400 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Luddesdown Parish Council (Luddesdown Parish Council)

    Luddesdown Parish Council has participated in all the many consultations run on this project and have concerns that have not been addressed in the consultation materials. Below is a summary of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 5 February 2023

  • David Robert Plant

    My concerns are over the effect on the roads at the Orsett Cock roundabout and the A13/A1014 roundabout. Also the loss of green belt land through Thurrock. It also appears the new road will not solve... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2023

  • Essex Area Ramblers (Essex Area Ramblers)

    The Essex Area Ramblers provided a response in September 2021 and in summary is: We are generally content that the replacement PRoWs are adequate in principle, but as there are no detailed plans at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2023

  • Mark Teeton

    I am interested in assessing the scheme in the following areas; Overall project programme feasibility and cost compared to similar projects around the world. As a tax payer, I want an honest... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2023

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP on behalf of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)

    APPLICATION BY NATIONAL HIGHWAYS LIMITED FOR AN ORDER GRANTING DEVELOPMENT CONSENT FOR THE LOWER THAMES CROSSING Planning Inspectorate Reference Number: TR010032 Section 56 Planning Act 2008: Relevant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 February 2023

  • Bluewater (Landsec) (Bluewater (Landsec))

    On behalf of Bluewater Shopping Centre, which is owned and managed by Landsec, I would like to make the following representations in support for the Lower Thames Crossing. To provide some context,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Forestry Commission (Forestry Commission)

    We wish to Register as an “Interested party” The Forestry Commission is a Statutory Party where NSIP applications are likely to affect the protection or expansion of forests and woodlands which we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Joanna Haigh

    The UK has a legal obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Road transport is now the economic sector which contributes most to these and action needs to be taken on reducing it. The Lower... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Kate Soper

    The plans for the LTC fly in the face of UK commitments on climate change and the reduction of carbon emissions. They are estimated to add 6.6 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent. They are opposed by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Kerstin Oloff

    as a researcher of environment and society, I am opposed to another new road project – the Lower Thames Crossing (LTC), a proposed six-lane, 22-kilometre motorway with a tunnel under the Thames near... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Peter Somerville

    The main points that I would like to make are: The Lower Thames Crossing will result in increased travel by road when what is needed now and in the future is a modal shift away from private vehicle... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Robin Beard

    While I am generally in favour of the Lower Thames Crossing, I do have some major reservations about the design that Highways England have submitted to you... because I think that the selected route... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 February 2023

  • Canterbury City Council (Canterbury City Council)

    We received Notice (under section 56 of the Planning Act 2008) that the above DCO application has now been accepted by the Planning Inspectorate This letter contains the representations of Canterbury... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • Graham Pike

    I am very pleased with the consultation materials provided and the clarity on the project itself.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • James Harkins

    This scheme is not the best available in that being road based will create too much NEE It should be rail based with no pollution at the point of use

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • Mrs Fay Plumb

    I am convinced that it will not provide value for money and that Ministers are being mislead as the figures they will be presented with are two years out of date. It is an ill-conceived scheme... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • Stephen Metcalfe

    As Member of Parliament for South Basildon and East Thurrock I wish to make representations in person on a number of issues of great concern to my constituents, including but not limited to: Ability... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 February 2023

  • Fraser Massey

    Concern and opposition to the Lower Thames Crossing for some of the following reasons:- Cost of the project Long running timescale of the project Impact on local health Impact on air quaility Impact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Gary Flowers

    Impact on local roads and lanes with movement of construction vehicles. Also the impact on local housing prices.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Irene Hamilton

    There is no evidence that this link road will have any benefits for this area. I live in South Ockendon and the impact this will have on the environment is criminal! The air pollution, the destruction... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Kent Countryside Access Forum (Kent Countryside Access Forum)

    The Kent Countryside Access Forum is a statutory body which advises Councils and other organisations on matters concerning Public Rights of Way (PRoW) and Green Spaces. The Forum represents the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Simon Barber

    I am opposing the Lower Thames River Crossing on the following grounds and the project would: -Increase traffic growth leading to more CO2 emissions, plus construction emissions -Not solve Dartford... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 February 2023

  • Dave Walker

    I'm opposing the proposed new Thames Crossing. I don't believe it will solve the current problems suffered due to the Dartford Crossing, and will have various negative impacts: There's no provision... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2023

  • James Wiggins

    the provision of also upgrading junction 3 on the M2 that connects to the A229 for access for coast bound traffic onto the M20 for Folkstone & Dover Tunnel & Ferry ports. At Peak times this is already... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2023

  • Keith Tomlins

    I am wishing to represent the interests of cyclists and other users of sustainable low carbon transport. Currently, the plans seem to only allow users of vehicles (cars, lorries etc) to use the lower... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2023

  • Strutt & Parker (Strutt & Parker) on behalf of Seventyholds Ltd (Seventyholds Ltd)

    Our Client, Seventyholds Ltd, is impacted by the LTC proposals, as submitted as part of this DCO application. We have and are still in ongoing discussions with Highways representatives about our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2023

  • William Hamilton

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 February 2023

  • Mandy Martin

    I would like to find out more as thi scheme will affect the lives of many of the local residents for ever. It will not solve the issue of the incomplete M25. I would like to know more about the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 February 2023

  • Michael John Saunders

    Dear Project Team, The concerns I have with Lower Thames Crossing project are as follows: ~ Pollution, especially with regard to the Government's Environment Act and its stated intention of clamping... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 February 2023

  • David Smith

    The proposed new crossing will destroy the air quality for all residents of the area in which it runs, it is well documented that the air pollution in high traffic areas is exceeds safe levels so the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Tony Starns

    The project would: increase traffic growth leading to more carbon emissions, and combined with the construction emissions (see below), the total carbon emissions from the scheme would be at least 6.6... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 February 2023

  • Ali Parsons

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Alison Wingfield

    It really concerns me when any future and further building across the country has and is not taking into any consideration, wildlife and the distraction of habitat in itself. Improving public... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Andrew Cox

    I have serious concerns regarding the Lower Thames Crossing: it will cause yet more damage to already hard pressed wildlife via habitat destruction, noise & pollution. Intended to ease traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Angela Davy

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Angela Lewington

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Belinda Burns

    I believe that this work will break laws of Co2 emissions and be potentially harmful to the environment and in particular wildlife. I am very concerned that we as human beings think we have the right... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Carole Wingrove

    I have great concerns re loss if wildlife. Many species will lose habitat and emissions from use will cause further harm to our environment

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Catherine Waterhouse

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Christine Burden

    I am horrified by the devastation that this proposal will wreak on south Essex. Wildlife will be irreparably damaged as SSSIs are destroyed or severely affected and biodiversity will be diminished.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Colin Horwood

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Colin Lambert

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Dean Bradbrook

    I am looking to register myself as an interested party. I am doing so because I live very close to both the final road and the potential compound and its entrance which is very close to my property on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Derek Kortlandt

    This project will cause immense environmental damage. Despite mitigation measures, there will be loss of habitat, disturbance to insect life, birds, mammals etc. In addition there will be a loss of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Francesca Burke

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Helen Wood

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Hellen Brown

    I have serious concerns about the impact that the new crossing will have on wildlife and habitat. Water voles, pollinators, increased light pollution and its affect on breeding patterns etc. once we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Ian Cotgrove

    We are in a climate and environmental emergency and this proposal is in direct conflict to the direction we need to be taking. Specifically I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Jacqueline Turner

    I should like to bring to the attention of the planning inspector the following . The unsure nature of the lower Thames implementation staff when attempting to discuss details of what and where and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023

  • Jacqui Shannon

    I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 February 2023